Hemoconcentration and predictors in Shiga toxin-producing E. coli-hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS).


Journal

Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)
ISSN: 1432-198X
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Nephrol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8708728

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 12 01 2021
accepted: 28 04 2021
revised: 18 04 2021
pubmed: 29 5 2021
medline: 26 3 2022
entrez: 28 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Hemoconcentration has been identified as a risk factor for a complicated course in Shiga toxin-producing E. coli-hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS). This single-center study assesses hemoconcentration and predictors at presentation in STEC-HUS treated from 2009-2017. Data of 107 pediatric patients with STEC-HUS were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with mild HUS (mHUS, definition: max. serum creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL and no major neurological symptoms) were compared to patients with severe HUS (sHUS, definition: max. serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL ± major neurological symptoms). Additionally, predictors of complicated HUS (dialysis ± major neurological symptoms) were analyzed. Sixteen of one hundred seven (15%) patients had mHUS. Admission of patients with sHUS occurred median 2 days earlier after the onset of symptoms than in patients with mHUS. On admission, patients with subsequent sHUS had significantly higher median hemoglobin (9.5 g/dL (3.6-15.7) vs. 8.5 g/dL (4.2-11.5), p = 0.016) than patients with mHUS. The product of hemoglobin (g/dL) and LDH (U/L) (cutoff value 13,302, sensitivity 78.0%, specificity of 87.5%) was a predictor of severe vs. mild HUS. Creatinine (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.93) and the previously published score hemoglobin (g/dL) + 2 × creatinine (mg/dL) showed a good prediction for development of complicated HUS (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.93). At presentation, patients with subsequent severe STEC-HUS had a higher degree of hemoconcentration. This underlines that fluid loss or reduced fluid intake/administration may be a risk factor for severe HUS. The good predictive value of the score hemoglobin (g/dL) + 2 × creatinine (mg/dL) for complicated HUS could be validated in our cohort. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary Information.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Hemoconcentration has been identified as a risk factor for a complicated course in Shiga toxin-producing E. coli-hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS). This single-center study assesses hemoconcentration and predictors at presentation in STEC-HUS treated from 2009-2017.
METHODS
Data of 107 pediatric patients with STEC-HUS were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with mild HUS (mHUS, definition: max. serum creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL and no major neurological symptoms) were compared to patients with severe HUS (sHUS, definition: max. serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL ± major neurological symptoms). Additionally, predictors of complicated HUS (dialysis ± major neurological symptoms) were analyzed.
RESULTS
Sixteen of one hundred seven (15%) patients had mHUS. Admission of patients with sHUS occurred median 2 days earlier after the onset of symptoms than in patients with mHUS. On admission, patients with subsequent sHUS had significantly higher median hemoglobin (9.5 g/dL (3.6-15.7) vs. 8.5 g/dL (4.2-11.5), p = 0.016) than patients with mHUS. The product of hemoglobin (g/dL) and LDH (U/L) (cutoff value 13,302, sensitivity 78.0%, specificity of 87.5%) was a predictor of severe vs. mild HUS. Creatinine (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.93) and the previously published score hemoglobin (g/dL) + 2 × creatinine (mg/dL) showed a good prediction for development of complicated HUS (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.93).
CONCLUSIONS
At presentation, patients with subsequent severe STEC-HUS had a higher degree of hemoconcentration. This underlines that fluid loss or reduced fluid intake/administration may be a risk factor for severe HUS. The good predictive value of the score hemoglobin (g/dL) + 2 × creatinine (mg/dL) for complicated HUS could be validated in our cohort. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary Information.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34046736
doi: 10.1007/s00467-021-05108-6
pii: 10.1007/s00467-021-05108-6
pmc: PMC8497454
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3777-3783

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Pediatr Int. 1999 Apr;41(2):223-7
pubmed: 10221034
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55(6):753-9
pubmed: 22670043
Pediatr Nephrol. 2020 Feb;35(2):331-339
pubmed: 31475299
Presse Med. 2012 Mar;41(3 Pt 2):e115-35
pubmed: 22284541
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1656-62
pubmed: 16651320
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 15;64(12):1637-1643
pubmed: 28329394
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1):
pubmed: 26644486
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Oct;165(10):884-9
pubmed: 21784993
Pediatr Nephrol. 2015 Feb;30(2):345-52
pubmed: 25149851
Lancet. 2005 Mar 19-25;365(9464):1073-86
pubmed: 15781103
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 3;346(1):23-32
pubmed: 11777999
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Jan 1;171(1):68-76
pubmed: 27893870
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Nov;177(11):1667-1674
pubmed: 30094644
Pediatr Nephrol. 2021 Jan;36(1):103-109
pubmed: 32681274
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Jul;19(7):642-7
pubmed: 10917223
Pediatr Int. 2009 Apr;51(2):216-9
pubmed: 19405919
Pediatr Nephrol. 2018 Oct;33(10):1791-1798
pubmed: 29961127
J Intern Med. 2017 Feb;281(2):123-148
pubmed: 27723152
Pediatr Nephrol. 2018 Nov;33(11):2057-2071
pubmed: 29372302
J Pediatr. 2015 Apr;166(4):1022-9
pubmed: 25661408
Eur J Intern Med. 2014 Feb;25(2):e29
pubmed: 24360866
Pediatr Nephrol. 2012 Aug;27(8):1407-10
pubmed: 22476204
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 10;70(8):1643-1651
pubmed: 31125419
Pediatr Nephrol. 2015 Dec;30(12):2115-9
pubmed: 26141929
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e673-80
pubmed: 15930195
J Pediatr. 2021 May;232:200-206.e4
pubmed: 33417918
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;55(1):33-41
pubmed: 22431799
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 May;54(10):1413-21
pubmed: 22412065

Auteurs

Sebastian Loos (S)

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Children's Hospital, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. s.loos@uke.de.

Jun Oh (J)

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Children's Hospital, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
University Children's Research@Kinder-UKE, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Laura van de Loo (L)

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Children's Hospital, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Markus J Kemper (MJ)

Department of Pediatrics, Asklepios Klink Nord, Hamburg, Germany.

Martin Blohm (M)

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Children's Hospital, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Raphael Schild (R)

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Children's Hospital, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH