Evaluation of Seropositivity Following BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Cancer.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Viral
/ immunology
BNT162 Vaccine
COVID-19
/ immunology
COVID-19 Vaccines
/ immunology
Case-Control Studies
Female
Humans
Immunogenicity, Vaccine
/ immunology
Immunoglobulin G
/ immunology
Israel
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
/ immunology
Prospective Studies
RNA, Messenger
/ immunology
SARS-CoV-2
/ immunology
Vaccination
/ methods
Vaccines, Synthetic
/ immunology
mRNA Vaccines
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2021
01 08 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
entrez:
28
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with cancer undergoing treatment are at high risk of COVID-19 following SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, their ability to produce an adequate antibody response to messenger RNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is unclear. To evaluate rates of antispike (anti-S) antibody response to a BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with cancer who are undergoing systemic treatment vs healthy controls. This prospective cohort study included 102 adult patients with solid tumors undergoing active intravenous anticancer treatment and 78 controls who received the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine at least 12 days before enrollment. The controls were taken from a convenience sample of the patients' family/caregivers who accompanied them to treatment. The study was conducted between February 22, 2021, and March 15, 2021 at Davidoff Cancer Center at Beilinson Hospital (Petah Tikva, Israel). Blood samples were drawn from the study participants. Serum samples were analyzed and the titers of the IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain were determined using a commercially available immunoassay. Seropositivity was defined as 50 or greater AU/mL. The primary outcome was the rate of seropositivity. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of IgG titers and identifying factors that were associated with seropositivity using univariate/multivariable analyses. The analysis included 180 participants, which comprised 102 patients with cancer (median [interquartile range (IQR)] age, 66 [56-72] years; 58 men [57%]) and 78 healthy controls (median [IQR] age, 62 [49-70] years; 25 men [32%]). The most common tumor type was gastrointestinal (29 [28%]). In the patient group, 92 (90%) were seropositive for SARS-CoV 2 antispike IgG antibodies after the second vaccine dose, whereas in the control group, all were seropositive. The median IgG titer in the patients with cancer was significantly lower than that in the controls (1931 [IQR, 509-4386] AU/mL vs 7160 [IQR, 3129-11 241] AU/mL; P < .001). In a multivariable analysis, the only variable that was significantly associated with lower IgG titers was treatment with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (β, -3.5; 95% CI, -5.6 to -1.5). In this cohort study of patients with cancer who were receiving active systemic therapy, 90% of patients exhibited adequate antibody response to the BNT162b2 vaccine, although their antibody titers were significantly lower than those of healthy controls. Further research into the clinical relevance of lower titers and their durability is required. Nonetheless, the data support vaccinating patients with cancer as a high priority, even during therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34047765
pii: 2780584
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2155
pmc: PMC8164144
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
RNA, Messenger
0
Vaccines, Synthetic
0
BNT162 Vaccine
N38TVC63NU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1133-1140Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):594-599
pubmed: 32998157
Support Care Cancer. 2001 Jan;9(1):65-8
pubmed: 11147146
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;58(3):e44-100
pubmed: 24311479
Lancet. 2021 Mar 20;397(10279):1057-1058
pubmed: 33640038
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Nov;139:43-50
pubmed: 32971510
Med Oncol. 2002;19(2):71-8
pubmed: 12180483
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Sep;6:1428-1438
pubmed: 32986516
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1412-1423
pubmed: 33626250
Lancet. 2020 Jun 20;395(10241):1907-1918
pubmed: 32473681
Br J Cancer. 1999 Apr;80(1-2):219-20
pubmed: 10389999
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2014 May 01;8:57-64
pubmed: 24855405
Cancer. 2021 May 1;127(9):1459-1468
pubmed: 33378122
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104539
pubmed: 32679298
Ann Oncol. 2008 Sep;19(9):1658
pubmed: 18662953
Cancer Discov. 2021 Feb;11(2):233-236
pubmed: 33355178
Ann Oncol. 2011 Sep;22(9):2031-2035
pubmed: 21303799
N Engl J Med. 1978 Aug 31;299(9):442-8
pubmed: 28483
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1218-1223
pubmed: 32581323
Med Sci Monit. 2006 Aug;12(8):CR332-6
pubmed: 16865064
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2368-2371
pubmed: 32302076
Vaccine. 2021 Jul 22;39(32):4423-4428
pubmed: 34210573
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):748-750
pubmed: 32359404
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5):
pubmed: 33574119
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 1;181(5):672-679
pubmed: 33625463
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):535-544
pubmed: 32645347
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 Feb 2;6(1):48
pubmed: 33531462