Measuring partnership synergy and functioning: Multi-stakeholder collaboration in primary health care.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 30 09 2020
accepted: 13 05 2021
entrez: 28 5 2021
pubmed: 29 5 2021
medline: 29 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In primary health care, multi-stakeholder partnerships between clinicians, policy makers, academic representatives and other stakeholders to improve service delivery are becoming more common. Literature on processes and approaches that enhance partnership effectiveness is growing. However, evidence on the performance of the measures of partnership functioning and the achievement of desired outcomes is still limited, due to the field's definitional ambiguity and the challenges inherent in measuring complex and evolving collaborative processes. Reliable measures are needed for external or self-assessment of partnership functioning, as intermediate steps in the achievement of desired outcomes. We adapted the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) and distributed it to multiple stakeholders within five partnerships in Canada and Australia. The instrument contained a number of partnership functioning sub-scales. New sub-scales were developed for the domains of communication and external environment. Partnership synergy was assessed using modified Partnership Synergy Processes and Partnership Synergy Outcomes sub-scales, and a combined Partnership Synergy scale. Ranking by partnership scores was compared with independent ranks based on a qualitative evaluation of the partnerships' development. 55 (90%) questionnaires were returned. Our results indicate that the instrument was capable of discriminating between different levels of dimensions of partnership functioning and partnership synergy even in a limited sample. The sub-scales were sufficiently reliable to have the capacity to discriminate between individuals, and between partnerships. There was negligible difference in the correlations between different partnership functioning dimensions and Partnership Synergy sub-scales. The Communication and External Environment sub-scales did not perform well metrically. The adapted partnership assessment tool is suitable for assessing the achievement of partnership synergy and specific indicators of partnership functioning. Further development of Communication and External Environment sub-scales is warranted. The instrument could be applied to assess internal partnership performance on key indicators across settings, in order to determine if the collaborative process is working well.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34048481
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252299
pii: PONE-D-20-29112
pmc: PMC8162647
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0252299

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
ID : TTF-130729
Pays : Canada

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:e03
pubmed: 16773145
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):163-214
pubmed: 26994713
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Apr;5(2):108-14
pubmed: 15090164
Health Educ Behav. 1998 Jun;25(3):338-53
pubmed: 9615243
Glob Health Promot. 2011 Jun;18(2):36-44
pubmed: 21596938
Global Health. 2016 May 20;12(1):22
pubmed: 27206731
Glob Health Promot. 2011 Sep;18(3):8-14
pubmed: 24803555
Promot Educ. 2000;7(2):16-23, 59, 67
pubmed: 11924343
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Oct;25(5):464-9
pubmed: 11688629
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Jun 30;4:224
pubmed: 21714931
Health Educ Q. 1996 Feb;23(1):65-79
pubmed: 8822402
Health Promot Int. 2011 Dec;26(4):408-20
pubmed: 21330307
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 24;8(1):e11022
pubmed: 30679151
Milbank Q. 2000;78(2):241-89, 151
pubmed: 10934994
Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):179-205, III-IV
pubmed: 11439464
Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:369-402
pubmed: 10884958
Global Health. 2016 May 06;12(1):17
pubmed: 27154550
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 Jul;9(4):215-27
pubmed: 11560737
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e027869
pubmed: 31352414
Health Educ Behav. 2002 Dec;29(6):683-98
pubmed: 12456129
Int J Integr Care. 2008 May 15;8:e08
pubmed: 18493591
Health Care Manage Rev. 1995 Winter;20(1):54-64
pubmed: 7744606
Health Promot Int. 2008 Dec;23(4):365-71
pubmed: 18835888
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Jun;24(3):279-85
pubmed: 22302071

Auteurs

Ekaterina Loban (E)

St. Mary's Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Cathie Scott (C)

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Virginia Lewis (V)

Australian Institute for Primary Care & Ageing, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Jeannie Haggerty (J)

St. Mary's Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH