An open-label randomized controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
COVID-19
Hydroxychloroquine
Interferon β-1a
Lopinavir/ritonavir
Randomized controlled trial
SARS-CoV-2
Journal
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
17
03
2021
revised:
06
05
2021
accepted:
09
05
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
entrez:
28
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We evaluated the clinical, virological and safety outcomes of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir-interferon (IFN)-β-1a, hydroxychloroquine or remdesivir in comparison to standard of care (control) in coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) inpatients requiring oxygen and/or ventilatory support. We conducted a phase III multicentre, open-label, randomized 1:1:1:1:1, adaptive, controlled trial (DisCoVeRy), an add-on to the Solidarity trial (NCT04315948, EudraCT2020-000936-23). The primary outcome was the clinical status at day 15, measured by the WHO seven-point ordinal scale. Secondary outcomes included quantification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in respiratory specimens and pharmacokinetic and safety analyses. We report the results for the lopinavir/ritonavir-containing arms and for the hydroxychloroquine arm, trials of which were stopped prematurely. The intention-to-treat population included 583 participants-lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 145), lopinavir/ritonavir-IFN-β-1a (n = 145), hydroxychloroquine (n = 145), control (n = 148)-among whom 418 (71.7%) were male, the median age was 63 years (IQR 54-71), and 211 (36.2%) had a severe disease. The day-15 clinical status was not improved with the investigational treatments: lopinavir/ritonavir versus control, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.83, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.26, p 0.39), lopinavir/ritonavir-IFN-β-1a versus control, aOR 0.69 (95%CI 0.45-1.04, p 0.08), and hydroxychloroquine versus control, aOR 0.93 (95%CI 0.62-1.41, p 0.75). No significant effect of investigational treatment was observed on SARS-CoV-2 clearance. Trough plasma concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir were higher than those expected, while those of hydroxychloroquine were those expected with the dosing regimen. The occurrence of serious adverse events was significantly higher in participants allocated to the lopinavir/ritonavir-containing arms. In adults hospitalized for COVID-19, lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir-IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine improved neither the clinical status at day 15 nor SARS-CoV-2 clearance in respiratory tract specimens.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34048876
pii: S1198-743X(21)00259-7
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.020
pmc: PMC8149166
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
Drug Combinations
0
lopinavir-ritonavir drug combination
0
Lopinavir
2494G1JF75
Hydroxychloroquine
4QWG6N8QKH
Ritonavir
O3J8G9O825
Interferon beta-1a
XRO4566Q4R
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1826-1837Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Aug 20;64(9):
pubmed: 32641296
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
J Virol. 2020 Nov 9;94(23):
pubmed: 32938761
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Trials. 2018 Jan 30;19(1):81
pubmed: 29382391
Drugs. 2010 Oct 1;70(14):1885-915
pubmed: 20836579
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 21;10(9):e041437
pubmed: 32958495
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 19;383(21):2030-2040
pubmed: 33031652
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2018 Jan 1;1072:320-327
pubmed: 29207305
Lancet. 2020 Oct 24;396(10259):1345-1352
pubmed: 33031764
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Sep 1;75(9):2376-2380
pubmed: 32473020
Biomed Chromatogr. 2007 Oct;21(10):1095-104
pubmed: 17582235
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 16;9(6):
pubmed: 32560044
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Dec;108(6):1176-1184
pubmed: 32767755
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 11;384(6):497-511
pubmed: 33264556
Antiviral Res. 2020 Jun;178:104786
pubmed: 32251767
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 7;382(19):1787-1799
pubmed: 32187464
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):732-739
pubmed: 32150618
J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Nov;51(11):1539-48
pubmed: 21209245
Thorax. 2004 Mar;59(3):252-6
pubmed: 14985565
Cell Discov. 2020 Mar 18;6:16
pubmed: 32194981
Nature. 2016 Mar 17;531(7594):381-5
pubmed: 26934220
J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 4;222(5):722-725
pubmed: 32559285
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Aug;58(8):4875-84
pubmed: 24841269
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7826):584-587
pubmed: 32698191
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 19;383(21):2041-2052
pubmed: 32706953
Antiviral Res. 2020 Jun;178:104791
pubmed: 32275914