Machine Learning to Classify Relative Seizure Frequency From Chronic Electrocorticography.
Journal
Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society
ISSN: 1537-1603
Titre abrégé: J Clin Neurophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506708
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Feb 2023
01 Feb 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
02
2024
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
8
2
2023
entrez:
28
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Brain responsive neurostimulation (NeuroPace) treats patients with refractory focal epilepsy and provides chronic electrocorticography (ECoG). We explored how machine learning algorithms applied to interictal ECoG could assess clinical response to changes in neurostimulation parameters. We identified five responsive neurostimulation patients each with ≥200 continuous days of stable medication and detection settings (median, 358 days per patient). For each patient, interictal ECoG segments for each month were labeled as "high" or "low" to represent relatively high or low long-episode (i.e., seizure) count compared with the median monthly long-episode count. Power from six conventional frequency bands from four responsive neurostimulation channels were extracted as features. For each patient, five machine learning algorithms were trained on 80% of ECoG, then tested on the remaining 20%. Classifiers were scored by the area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve. We explored how individual circadian cycles of seizure activity could inform classifier building. Support vector machine or gradient boosting models achieved the best performance, ranging from 0.705 (fair) to 0.892 (excellent) across patients. High gamma power was the most important feature, tending to decrease during low-seizure-frequency epochs. For two subjects, training on ECoG recorded during the circadian ictal peak resulted in comparable model performance, despite less data used. Machine learning analysis on retrospective background ECoG can classify relative seizure frequency for an individual patient. High gamma power was the most informative, whereas individual circadian patterns of seizure activity can guide model building. Machine learning classifiers built on interictal ECoG may guide stimulation programming.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34049367
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000858
pii: 00004691-202302000-00010
pmc: PMC8617083
mid: NIHMS1686439
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
151-159Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : K23 NS104252
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
P. Dugan and A. Liu have received speaking honoraria from Neuropace. A. Liu has consulted for the ECRI Institute. D. Friedman receives salary support for consulting and clinical trial–related activities performed on behalf of The Epilepsy Study Consortium, a nonprofit organization. Within the past two years, The Epilepsy Study Consortium received payments for research services performed by D. Friedman from Axcella, Biogen, Cerevel, Crossject, Engage Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Pfizer, SK Life Science, Xenon, and Zynerba; he has also served as a paid consultant for Eisai and Neurelis Pharmaceuticals; he has received travel support from Medtronics, Eisai, and the Epilepsy Foundation; he has received research support from the CDC, NINDS, Epilepsy Foundation, Empatica, Epitel, UCB, Inc, and Neuropace; he serves on the scientific advisory board for Receptor Life Sciences; and he holds equity interests in Neuroview Technology and Receptor Life Sciences. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Références
Bergey GK, Morrell MJ, Mizrahi EM, et al. Long-term treatment with responsive brain stimulation in adults with refractory partial seizures. Neurology 2015;84:810–817.
Morrell MJ, Halpern C. Responsive direct brain stimulation for epilepsy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2016;27:111–121.
King-Stephens D, Mirro E, Weber PB, et al. Lateralization of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with chronic ambulatory electrocorticography. Epilepsia 2015;56:959–967.
Duckrow RB, Tcheng TK. Daily variation in an intracranial EEG feature in humans detected by a responsive neurostimulator system. Epilepsia 2007;48:1614–1620.
Anderson CT, Tcheng TK, Sun FT, Morrell MJ. Day-night patterns of epileptiform activity in 65 patients with long-term ambulatory electrocorticography. J Clin Neurophysiol 2015;32:406–412.
Baud MO, Kleen JK, Mirro EA, et al. Multi-day rhythms modulate seizure risk in epilepsy. Nat Commun 2018;9:88.
Karoly PJ, Goldenholz DM, Freestone DR, et al. Circadian and circaseptan rhythms in human epilepsy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:977–985.
Spencer DC, Sun FT, Brown SN, et al. Circadian and ultradian patterns of epileptiform discharges differ by seizure-onset location during long-term ambulatory intracranial monitoring. Epilepsia 2016;57:1495–1502.
Cook MJ, O'Brien TJ, Berkovic SF, et al. Prediction of seizure likelihood with a long-term, implanted seizure advisory system in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a first-in-man study. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:563–571.
Kuhlmann L, Karoly P, Freestone DR, et al. Epilepsyecosystem.org: crowd-sourcing reproducible seizure prediction with long-term human intracranial EEG. Brain 2018;141:2619–2630.
Karoly PJ, Cook MJ, Maturana M, et al. Forecasting cycles of seizure likelihood. Epilepsia 2020;61:776–786.
Freestone DR, Karoly PJ, Cook MJ. A forward-looking review of seizure prediction. Curr Opin Neurol 2017;30:167–173.
Baud MO, Rao VR. Gauging seizure risk. Neurology 2018;91:967–973.
Sun FT, Arcot Desai S, Tcheng TK, Morrell MJ. Changes in the electrocorticogram after implantation of intracranial electrodes in humans: the implant effect. Clin Neurophysiol 2018;129:676–686.
Ung H, Baldassano SN, Bink H, et al. Intracranial EEG fluctuates over months after implanting electrodes in human brain. J Neural Eng 2017;14:056011.
Skarpaas TL, Tcheng TK, Morrell MJ. Clinical and electrocorticographic response to antiepileptic drugs in patients treated with responsive stimulation. Epilepsy Behav 2018;83:192–200.
Karoly PJ, Freestone DR, Boston R, et al. Interictal spikes and epileptic seizures: their relationship and underlying rhythmicity. Brain 2016;139(pt 4):1066–1078.
Liu Q, Chen C, Zhang Y, Hu Z. Feature selection for support vector machines with RBF kernel. Artif Intell Rev 2011;36:99–115.
Hoppe C, Poepel A, Elger CE. Epilepsy: accuracy of patient seizure counts. Arch Neurol 2007;64:1595–1599.
Hoppe C, Elger CE, Helmstaedter C. Long-term memory impairment in patients with focal epilepsy. Epilepsia 2007;48(suppl 9):26–29.
Blumenfeld H. Impaired consciousness in epilepsy. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:814–826.
Arcot Desai S, Tcheng TK, Morrell MJ. Quantitative electrocorticographic biomarkers of clinical outcomes in mesial temporal lobe epileptic patients treated with the RNS system. Clin Neurophysiol 2019;130:1364–1374.
Skarpaas TL, Jarosiewicz B, Morrell MJ. Brain-responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy (RNS System). Epilepsy Res 2019;153:68–70.
Quraishi IH, Mercier MR, Skarpaas TL, Hirsch LJ. Early detection rate changes from a brain-responsive neurostimulation system predict efficacy of newly added antiseizure drugs. Epilepsia 2020;61:138–148.