Placebo effects in low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.
Journal
European journal of pain (London, England)
ISSN: 1532-2149
Titre abrégé: Eur J Pain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
30
5
2021
medline:
28
10
2021
entrez:
29
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The current treatments of primary musculoskeletal low back pain (LBP) have a low to moderate efficacy, which might be improved by looking at the contribution of placebo effects. However, the size of true placebo effects in LBP is unknown. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were executed of randomized controlled trials investigating placebo effects in LBP. The study protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews Prospero (CRD42019148745). A literature search (in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO) up to 2021 February 16th yielded 2,423 studies. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility and risk of bias. Eighteen studies were eligible for the systematic review and 5 for the meta-analysis. Fourteen of the 18 studies were clinical treatment studies, and 4 were experimental studies specifically assessing placebo effects. The clinical treatment studies provided varying evidence for placebo effects in chronic LBP but insufficient evidence for acute and subacute LBP. Most experimental studies investigating chronic LBP revealed significant placebo effects. The meta-analysis of 5 treatment studies investigating chronic LBP depicted a significant moderate effect size of placebo for pain intensity (SMD = 0.57) and disability (SMD = 0.52). This review shows a significant contribution of placebo effects to chronic LBP symptom relief in clinical and experimental conditions. The meta-analysis revealed that placebo effects can influence chronic LBP intensity and disability. However, additional studies are required for more supporting evidence and evidence for placebo effects in acute or subacute LBP. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence of true placebo effects in low back pain (LBP). It shows a significant contribution of placebo effects to chronic LBP symptom relief. The results highlight the importance of patient- and context-related factors in fostering treatment effects in this patient group. New studies could provide insight into the potential value of actively making use of placebo effects in clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
The current treatments of primary musculoskeletal low back pain (LBP) have a low to moderate efficacy, which might be improved by looking at the contribution of placebo effects. However, the size of true placebo effects in LBP is unknown. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were executed of randomized controlled trials investigating placebo effects in LBP.
DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT
The study protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews Prospero (CRD42019148745). A literature search (in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO) up to 2021 February 16th yielded 2,423 studies. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility and risk of bias.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies were eligible for the systematic review and 5 for the meta-analysis. Fourteen of the 18 studies were clinical treatment studies, and 4 were experimental studies specifically assessing placebo effects. The clinical treatment studies provided varying evidence for placebo effects in chronic LBP but insufficient evidence for acute and subacute LBP. Most experimental studies investigating chronic LBP revealed significant placebo effects. The meta-analysis of 5 treatment studies investigating chronic LBP depicted a significant moderate effect size of placebo for pain intensity (SMD = 0.57) and disability (SMD = 0.52).
CONCLUSIONS
This review shows a significant contribution of placebo effects to chronic LBP symptom relief in clinical and experimental conditions. The meta-analysis revealed that placebo effects can influence chronic LBP intensity and disability. However, additional studies are required for more supporting evidence and evidence for placebo effects in acute or subacute LBP.
SIGNIFICANCE
This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence of true placebo effects in low back pain (LBP). It shows a significant contribution of placebo effects to chronic LBP symptom relief. The results highlight the importance of patient- and context-related factors in fostering treatment effects in this patient group. New studies could provide insight into the potential value of actively making use of placebo effects in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34051018
doi: 10.1002/ejp.1811
pmc: PMC8518410
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1876-1897Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC ®.
Références
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26166
pubmed: 22087222
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Sep;13(7):391-5
pubmed: 2145384
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Sep 1;18(11):1388-95
pubmed: 8235809
Clin J Pain. 2006 Feb;22(2):204-11
pubmed: 16428957
Pain. 2017 Oct;158(10):1893-1902
pubmed: 28614188
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):E690-E701
pubmed: 28632555
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):145-50
pubmed: 6222487
Pain Res Manag. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):45-52
pubmed: 21369541
Physiol Rev. 2013 Jul;93(3):1207-46
pubmed: 23899563
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):139-45
pubmed: 26343745
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 02;(9):CD000963
pubmed: 25180773
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):105-14
pubmed: 16807131
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 15;217:116899
pubmed: 32380138
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017 Mar 12;37(3):321-324
pubmed: 29231443
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;139:107-128
pubmed: 30146044
Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:65-74
pubmed: 27133031
J Pain. 2015 Feb;16(2):99-115
pubmed: 25478803
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 25;10:449
pubmed: 31293460
Pain. 2016 Dec;157(12):2766-2772
pubmed: 27755279
Pain. 2012 Sep;153(9):1883-1889
pubmed: 22770838
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:932407
pubmed: 19525330
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Feb 1;20(3):341-52
pubmed: 7732471
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014 Aug;48(4):669-75
pubmed: 25338248
J Pain. 2014 Feb;15(2):136-48
pubmed: 24361109
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(4):204-210
pubmed: 29895014
Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):19-27
pubmed: 30586067
Forsch Komplementmed. 2013;20(3):180-8
pubmed: 23860019
Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56
pubmed: 6226917
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;139:211-231
pubmed: 30146048
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2017 Mar;61(1):6-17
pubmed: 28413219
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Dec 28;2020:6636979
pubmed: 33425079
Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Nov-Dec;24(6):539-549
pubmed: 31866161
Pain. 2020 Jan;161(1):11-23
pubmed: 31453980
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 May;55(5):430-5
pubmed: 12007544
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2391-9
pubmed: 25963754
J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 6;32(23):8053-64
pubmed: 22674280
J Pain. 2015 Apr;16(4):299-305
pubmed: 25637296
Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3
pubmed: 6450426
Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 11;169(9):858-66
pubmed: 19433697
Rheumatol Rehabil. 1977 Feb;16(1):34-6
pubmed: 139668
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38
pubmed: 8080219
Health Psychol. 1985;4(4):307-21
pubmed: 2932330
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD003974
pubmed: 20091554
Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2791-2803
pubmed: 29971708
BMJ Clin Evid. 2010 Oct 08;2010:
pubmed: 21418678
Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2:S169-91
pubmed: 16550447
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 27;166(4):450-7
pubmed: 16505266
Eur J Pain. 2021 Oct;25(9):1876-1897
pubmed: 34051018
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):14
pubmed: 29482537
Pain. 2002 Mar;96(1-2):189-96
pubmed: 11932074
BMJ. 2020 Jul 20;370:m1668
pubmed: 32690477
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Feb;21(1):77-91
pubmed: 17350545
Psychosom Med. 2017 May;79(4):388-394
pubmed: 27922566
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 May;48(5):520-7
pubmed: 19109315
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2003 Oct;16(5):515-9
pubmed: 17021505