Long-term real-world experience with ipilimumab and non-ipilimumab therapies in advanced melanoma: the IMAGE study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Chemoradiotherapy
/ methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Ipilimumab
/ administration & dosage
Male
Melanoma
/ immunology
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Radiosurgery
/ statistics & numerical data
Skin Neoplasms
/ immunology
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Advanced melanoma
Ipilimumab
Overall survival
Quality of life
Real-world
Subsequent therapy
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 May 2021
29 May 2021
Historique:
received:
20
11
2020
accepted:
15
03
2021
entrez:
30
5
2021
pubmed:
31
5
2021
medline:
16
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ipilimumab has shown long-term overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma in clinical trials, but robust real-world evidence is lacking. We present long-term outcomes from the IMAGE study (NCT01511913) in patients receiving ipilimumab and/or non-ipilimumab (any approved treatment other than ipilimumab) systemic therapies. IMAGE was a multinational, prospective, observational study assessing adult patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab or non-ipilimumab systemic therapies between June 2012 and March 2015 with ≥3 years of follow-up. Adjusted OS curves based on multivariate Cox regression models included covariate effects. Safety and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Among 1356 patients, 1094 (81%) received ipilimumab and 262 (19%) received non-ipilimumab index therapy (systemic therapy [chemotherapy, anti-programmed death 1 antibodies, or BRAF ± MEK inhibitors], radiotherapy, and radiosurgery). In the overall population, median age was 64 years, 60% were male, 78% were from Europe, and 78% had received previous treatment for advanced melanoma. In the ipilimumab-treated cohort, 780 (71%) patients did not receive subsequent therapy (IPI-noOther) and 314 (29%) received subsequent non-ipilimumab therapy (IPI-Other) on study. In the non-ipilimumab-treated cohort, 205 (78%) patients remained on or received other subsequent non-ipilimumab therapy (Other-Other) and 57 (22%) received subsequent ipilimumab therapy (Other-IPI) on study. Among 1151 patients who received ipilimumab at any time during the study (IPI-noOther, IPI-Other, and Other-IPI), 296 (26%) reported CTCAE grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events, most occurring in year 1. Ipilimumab-treated and non-ipilimumab-treated patients who switched therapy (IPI-Other and Other-IPI) had longer OS than those who did not switch (IPI-noOther and Other-Other). Patients with prior therapy who did not switch therapy (IPI-noOther and Other-Other) showed similar OS. In treatment-naive patients, those in the IPI-noOther group tended to have longer OS than those in the Other-Other group. Patient-reported outcomes were similar between treatment cohorts. With long-term follow-up (≥ 3 years), safety and OS in this real-world population of patients treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg were consistent with those reported in clinical trials. Patient-reported quality of life was maintained over the study period. OS analysis across both pretreated and treatment-naive patients suggested a beneficial role of ipilimumab early in treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01511913. Registered January 19, 2012 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01511913.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Ipilimumab has shown long-term overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma in clinical trials, but robust real-world evidence is lacking. We present long-term outcomes from the IMAGE study (NCT01511913) in patients receiving ipilimumab and/or non-ipilimumab (any approved treatment other than ipilimumab) systemic therapies.
METHODS
METHODS
IMAGE was a multinational, prospective, observational study assessing adult patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab or non-ipilimumab systemic therapies between June 2012 and March 2015 with ≥3 years of follow-up. Adjusted OS curves based on multivariate Cox regression models included covariate effects. Safety and patient-reported outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 1356 patients, 1094 (81%) received ipilimumab and 262 (19%) received non-ipilimumab index therapy (systemic therapy [chemotherapy, anti-programmed death 1 antibodies, or BRAF ± MEK inhibitors], radiotherapy, and radiosurgery). In the overall population, median age was 64 years, 60% were male, 78% were from Europe, and 78% had received previous treatment for advanced melanoma. In the ipilimumab-treated cohort, 780 (71%) patients did not receive subsequent therapy (IPI-noOther) and 314 (29%) received subsequent non-ipilimumab therapy (IPI-Other) on study. In the non-ipilimumab-treated cohort, 205 (78%) patients remained on or received other subsequent non-ipilimumab therapy (Other-Other) and 57 (22%) received subsequent ipilimumab therapy (Other-IPI) on study. Among 1151 patients who received ipilimumab at any time during the study (IPI-noOther, IPI-Other, and Other-IPI), 296 (26%) reported CTCAE grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events, most occurring in year 1. Ipilimumab-treated and non-ipilimumab-treated patients who switched therapy (IPI-Other and Other-IPI) had longer OS than those who did not switch (IPI-noOther and Other-Other). Patients with prior therapy who did not switch therapy (IPI-noOther and Other-Other) showed similar OS. In treatment-naive patients, those in the IPI-noOther group tended to have longer OS than those in the Other-Other group. Patient-reported outcomes were similar between treatment cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
With long-term follow-up (≥ 3 years), safety and OS in this real-world population of patients treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg were consistent with those reported in clinical trials. Patient-reported quality of life was maintained over the study period. OS analysis across both pretreated and treatment-naive patients suggested a beneficial role of ipilimumab early in treatment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01511913. Registered January 19, 2012 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01511913.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34051732
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08032-y
pii: 10.1186/s12885-021-08032-y
pmc: PMC8164785
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Ipilimumab
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01511913']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase IV
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
642Références
Cancer Med. 2016 Jul;5(7):1436-43
pubmed: 27118102
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44
pubmed: 9440735
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23
pubmed: 20525992
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34
pubmed: 30620402
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Jun 13;10:66
pubmed: 22694829
Curr Oncol Rep. 2018 Mar 23;20(3):29
pubmed: 29569208
Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):611-622
pubmed: 28359784
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Mar;74:89-95
pubmed: 28335891
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 09;13(2):
pubmed: 33435389
Curr Oncol Rep. 2019 Jul 29;21(9):76
pubmed: 31359162
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 20;38(33):3937-3946
pubmed: 32997575
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):187-194
pubmed: 30422243
Adv Med Sci. 2020 Sep;65(2):316-323
pubmed: 32554313
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;33(17):1889-94
pubmed: 25667295
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862
pubmed: 28822576
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Jul 3;7(1):165
pubmed: 31269983
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):383-390
pubmed: 28671856
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1535-1546
pubmed: 31562797
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1191-6
pubmed: 25713437
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2517-26
pubmed: 21639810
Ann Oncol. 2013 Aug;24(8):2174-80
pubmed: 23666915
Melanoma Res. 2015 Oct;25(5):432-42
pubmed: 26225580
Oncotarget. 2019 Jul 16;10(44):4513-4515
pubmed: 31360300
J Transl Med. 2014 May 07;12:116
pubmed: 24885479