Association between lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and spinal pathologies based on T2 whole-spine sagittal magnetic resonance imaging.
Lumbar disc herniation
Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae
Spinal stenosis
Whole-spine sagittal MRI
Journal
Skeletal radiology
ISSN: 1432-2161
Titre abrégé: Skeletal Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7701953
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
28
12
2020
accepted:
02
05
2021
revised:
24
04
2021
pubmed:
31
5
2021
medline:
27
10
2021
entrez:
30
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the association between 4, 5, or 6 lumbar spine vertebrae and the presence of lumbar spinal pathologies. We reviewed all MRI reports and images performed between August 1st, 2018 and July 31st, 2019. Lumbar spine pathologies such as disc herniation, lytic spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis were recorded. The reviewer studied the T2 sagittal screening of the entire spine and counted down manually from C2 to T12 on the assumption that there are seven cervical and twelve dorsal vertebrae. We then recorded whether there were four, five, or six lumbar vertebrae. Our work incorporated a total of 1985 patients for whom T2-weighted entire spine sagittal MR images were obtainable. The study cohort's average age was 52.2 ± 15.9 years, comprising 944 males and 1041 females. One hundred and thirty-three patients (6.7%) had 4 lumbar-type vertebrae; 1799 (90.6%) had 5 lumbar-type vertebrae; and 53 (2.7%) had 6 lumbar-type vertebrae. There was a statistically significant difference between the rates of 6 lumbar-type vertebrae in males versus females (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference with more spinal stenosis patients in the 6 lumbar-type vertebrae compared to the 4 or 5 lumbar-type vertebrae groups (p < 0.001). Our study shows that spinal stenosis is significantly more common in patients with 6 lumbar-type vertebrae.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34052868
doi: 10.1007/s00256-021-03809-5
pii: 10.1007/s00256-021-03809-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2503-2508Informations de copyright
© 2021. Crown.
Références
Luoma K, et al. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra: relation to disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(2):200–5.
doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000107223.02346.A8
Aihara T, et al. Intervertebral disc degeneration associated with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: a clinical and anatomical study. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2005;87(5):687–91.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15727
Smorgick Y, Mirovsky Y, Fischgrund JS, Baker KC, Gelfer Y, Anekstein Y. Radiographic predisposing factors for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Orthopedics. 2014;37(3):e260–4.
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140225-58
Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984;9(5):493–5.
doi: 10.1097/00007632-198407000-00014
Wigh RE. Anthony HF Jr Transitional lumbosacral discs: probability of herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981;6(2):168–71.
doi: 10.1097/00007632-198103000-00011
Tang M, Yang X-F, Yang S-W, Han P, Ma Y-M, Hui Yu, Zhu B. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in a population-based study of 5860 individuals: prevalence and relationship to low back pain. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(9):1679–82.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.036
Nardo L, Alizai H, Virayavanich W, Liu F, Hernandez A, Lynch JA, Nevitt MC, McCulloch CE, Lane NE, Link TM. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: association with low back pain. Radiology. 2012;265(2):497–503.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112747
Vergauwen S, Parizel PM, van Breusegem L, Van Goethem JW, Nackaerts Y, Van den Hauwe L, De Schepper AM. Distribution and incidence of degenerative spine changes in patients with a lumbo-sacral transitional vertebra. Eur Spine J. 1997;6(3):168–72.
doi: 10.1007/BF01301431
Hanhivaara J, Määttä JH, Niinimäki J, Nevalainen MT. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae are associated with lumbar degeneration: retrospective evaluation of 3855 consecutive abdominal CT scans. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(6):3409–16.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06691-2
Tini PG, Wieser C, Zinn WM. The transitional vertebra of the lumbosacral spine: its radiological classification, incidence, prevalence, and clinical significance. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1977;16:180–5.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/16.3.180
Otani K, Konno S, Kikuchi S. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and nerve-root symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(8):1137–40.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B8.0831137
Apazidis A, Ricart PA, Diefenbach CM, Spivak JM. The prevalence of transitional vertebrae in the lumbar spine. Spine J. 2011;11(9):858–62.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.005
Paik NC, Lim CS, Jang HS. Numeric and morphological verification of lumbosacral segments in 8280 consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(10):E573-8.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828b7195
Schmitz A, Jaeger UE, Koenig R, Kandyba J, Wagner UA, Giesecke J, et al. A new MRI technique for imaging scoliosis in the sagittal plane. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:114–7.
doi: 10.1007/s005860100250
Lian J, Levine N, Cho W. A review of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and associated vertebral numeration. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:995–1004.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5554-8
Weisz GM, Lee P. Spinal canal stenosis. Concept of spinal reserve capacity: radiologic measurements and clinical applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;179:134–40.
doi: 10.1097/00003086-198310000-00019
Andreisek G, Deyo RA, Jarvik JG, Porchet F, Winklhofer SF, Steurer J, LSOS working group. Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis-an initiative for structured reporting. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:3224–32.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3346-z
Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J. 2014;14:2525–45.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.022
Benditz A, Boluki D, Weber M, et al. Comparison of lumbar lordosis in lateral radiographs in standing position with supine MR imaging in consideration of the sacral slope. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2017;189:233–9.
Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, Bresnahan BW, Chen LE, Deyo RA, Halabi S, Turner JA, Avins AL, James K, Wald JT, Kallmes DF, Jarvik JG. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:811–6. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4173 .
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4173
pubmed: 25430861
pmcid: 4464797
Brinjikji W, Diehn FE, Jarvik JG, Carr CM, Kallmes DF, Murad MH, Luetmer PH. MRI findings of disc degeneration are more prevalent in adults with low back pain than in asymptomatic controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:2394–9. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4498 .
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4498
pubmed: 26359154
pmcid: 7964277
Abbas J, Peled N, Hershkovitz I, Hamoud K. Is lumbosacral transitional vertebra associated with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis? Biomed Res Int. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3871819 .
doi: 10.1155/2019/3871819
pubmed: 31281838
pmcid: 6590608
Vergauwen S, et al. Distribution and incidence of degenerative spine changes in patients with a lumbo-sacral transitional vertebra. Eur Spine J. 1997;6(3):168–72.
doi: 10.1007/BF01301431
Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(3):346–53.
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65
Hanson EH, Mishra RK, Chang DS, Perkins TG, Bonifield DR, Tandy RD, Cartwright PE, Peoples RR, Orrison WW Jr. Sagittal whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging in 750 consecutive outpatients: accurate determination of the number of lumbar vertebral bodies. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12:47–55. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.7.SPINE09326
doi: 10.3171/2009.7.SPINE09326
pubmed: 20043764