Therapeutic relationships in speech-language pathology: a scoping review protocol.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
1
6
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
31
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of empirical research regarding the therapeutic relationship between speech-language pathologists and their clients of all ages and clinical areas. The influence of a positive relationship between professionals and clients on the process and outcome of interventions is well documented for many health professions. However, research in speech-language pathology predominantly focuses on the outcome of specific treatment methods and techniques. The number of empirical research studies on the therapeutic relationship within this research area is increasing. At present, existing research has not been summarized and compared. The review will include all empirical research that addresses the therapeutic relationship between speech-language pathologists and their clients of all ages and clinical areas. Since speech-language pathologists often collaborate intensively with caregivers of their clients, such as parents or partners, these groups will also be included. Systematic searches will be conducted across seven research databases (ASHAWire, CINAHL, ERIC, Fachportal Pädagogik, LIVIVO, MEDLINE [PubMed], and PsycINFO) and four unpublished/gray literature databases (evidenssst, ndldt, OpenGrey, and SSOAR). Data will be extracted by two independent reviewers for author(s), year of publication, country of origin, research questions, participants, terminology and theoretical foundations, research design, and focus. Central findings concerning the therapeutic relationship on the input-, process-, outcome, and output-level of speech-language interventions will be analyzed. Results will be presented as a narrative summary.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34054031
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00331
pii: 02174543-900000000-99643
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2870-2876Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 JBI.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Norcross JC, Lambert MJ. Psychotherapy relationships that work III. Psychotherapy 2018;55 (4):303–315.
Babatunde F, MacDermid J, MacIntyre N. Characteristics of therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17 (19):1–23.
Hall AM, Ferreira PH, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira ML. The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2010;90 (8):1099–1110.
Fourie R, editor. Therapeutic processes for communication disorders. A guide for clinicians and students. Hove, New York: Psychology Press; 2011. 274p.
Clarkson P. The therapeutic relationship. 2nd ed.2003; London, Philadelphia: Whurr, 428 p.
Auhagen AE. [Key social concepts of the therapeutic relationship.] In: Hermer M, Röhrle B, editors. [Therapeutic relationship manual]. Band 1. Allgemeiner Teil. Tübingen: dgvt-Verlag; 2008. p. 169-204. [German].
Sumsion T. A revised definition of client centred-practice. Br J OccupTher 2000;63 (7):304–310.
Taylor RR, Lee SW, Kielhofner G, Ketkar M. Therapeutic use of self: a nationwide survey of practitioners’ attitudes and experiences. Am J Occup Ther 2009;63 (2):198–207.
Morrison TL, Smith JD. Working alliance development in occupational therapy: a cross-case analysis. Aust Occup Ther J 2013;60 (5):326–333.
Palmadottir G. Client-therapist relationships. Experiences of occupational therapy clients in rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther 2006;69 (9):394–401.
Miciak M, Mayan M, Brown C, Joyce AS, Gross DP. A framework for establishing connections in physiotherapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract 2019;35 (1):40–56.
Göldner J, Hansen H, Wanetschka V. [The therapeutic relationship in speech therapy. Structured summary of the current state of research]. Forum Logopädie 2017;31 (5):12–19. [German].
Health and Care Professions Council. Standards of proficiency – speech and language therapists [internet]. London: Health and Care Professions Council; 2014 [cited 2020 Aug 03]. Available from: https://www.rcslt.org/-/media/Project/RCSLT/standards-of-proficiency-slts.pdf.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [internet]. Rockville: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 03]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/policy/SP2016-00343/.
Watts Pappas N, McLeod S, editors. Working with families in speech-language pathology. San Diego, Oxford, Brisbane: Plural Publishing; 2008.
Troia GA, Wallace SE. Expanding the envelope of care: redefining the patient as the patient-family caregiver unit. Top Lang Disord 2019;39 (1):1–2.
Luterman DM. Counseling persons with communication disorders and their families. 5th ed.2008; Austin: Pro-Ed, 215 p.
Bernstein Ratner N. Evidence-based practice: an examination of its ramifications for the practice of speech-language pathology. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2006;37 (4):257–267.
Ebert KD, Kohnert K. Common factors in speech-language treatment: an exploratory study of effective clinicians. J Commun Disord 2010;43 (2):133–147.
Beier J. Haring R, Siegmüller J. [On the relationship between findings and well-being in evidence-based speech therapy - a plea for considering general impact factors]. [Evidence-based practice in health professions: opportunities and challenges for research and application]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2018. 197–214. [German].
Walsh IP, Felson Duchan J. Fourie R. Product and process depictions of rapport between clients and their speech-language pathologists during clinical interaction. Therapeutic processes for communication disorders. A guide for clinicians and students. Hove, New York: Psychology Press; 2011. 53–65.
Sønsterud H, Kirmess M, Howells K, Ward D, Feragen KB, Halvorsen MS. The working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2019;54 (4):606–619.
van Leer E, Connor NP. Predicting and influencing voice therapy adherence using social-cognitive factors and mobile video. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2015;24 (2):164–176.
Ebert KD. Measuring clinician-client relationships in speech-language treatment for school-age children. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2017;26 (1):146–152.
Lawton M, Conroy P, Sage K, Haddock G. Aphasia and stroke therapeutic alliance measure (A-STAM): development and preliminary psychometric evaluation. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2019;21 (5):459–469.
Orlinsky DE. The “generic model of psychotherapy” after 25 years: evolution of a research-based metatheory. J Psychother Integr 2009;19 (4):319–339.
Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 03]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169 (7):467–473.
JBI. Critical appraisal tools. Adelaide, JBI; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 20]. Available from: https://joannabriggs.org/critical-appraisal-tools.
JBI. JBI levels of evidence. Adelaide, JBI; 2014 [cited 2020 Dec 20]. Available from: https://joannabriggs.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI-Levels-of-evidence_2014_0.pdf.