Postprocedural Endophthalmitis or Postprocedural Intraocular Inflammation: A Diagnostic Conundrum.
AC paracentesis
Culture-negative
Endophthalmitis
Intra-vitreal injection
Intraocular inflammation
Journal
Case reports in ophthalmology
ISSN: 1663-2699
Titre abrégé: Case Rep Ophthalmol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101532006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
31
08
2020
accepted:
02
10
2020
entrez:
31
5
2021
pubmed:
1
6
2021
medline:
1
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We experienced an atypical endophthalmitis occurring post consecutively performed in-office procedures; an intravitreal injection (IVI) of ranibizumab followed by an anterior chamber (AC) paracentesis performed twice in an eye with neovascular glaucoma (NVG). A 52-year-old diabetic male who was asymptomatic developed signs of endophthalmitis and decreased vision without pain in his left eye a few days post-IVI and AC paracentesis. The condition worsened after an initial vitreous tap and injection of antibiotics. Cultures of vitreous and aqueous samples were negative. Complete resolution occurred after a pars plana vitrectomy with IVI of antibiotics and steroid with removal of a dense "yellowish-brown" fibrinous plaque. The absence of pain, presence of a peculiar colored fibrin, mild-to-moderate vitritis without retinitis, negative cultures, and complete recovery despite the fulminant presentation; favor a diagnosis of inflammation over infection. We hypothesize that a micro-leak from a 26-gauge AC tap tract might have served as an entry port for 5% povidone-iodine from the ocular surface thus inciting inflammation. However, an exuberant inflammatory response that can be typically seen in NVG eyes after intraocular procedures cannot be excluded. Various causes of inflammation post-procedures, both toxic and nontoxic should be considered in atypical culture-negative fulminant endophthalmitis cases with good outcome posttreatment. Any minor ocular procedure may carry a risk of such complication. Patient counseling and care must be exercised in performing these procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34054495
doi: 10.1159/000511970
pii: cop-0012-0418
pmc: PMC8136315
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
418-424Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep 09;8:1793-9
pubmed: 25228797
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;95(5):e373-e378
pubmed: 28271619
Retina. 2011 Apr;31(4):662-8
pubmed: 21836400
Ophthalmology. 2012 Aug;119(8):1609-14
pubmed: 22480743
Cornea. 2000 Jul;19(4):546-50
pubmed: 10928775
Retina. 2010 Oct;30(9):1432-40
pubmed: 20559156
Retina. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(10):1395-9
pubmed: 18827737
Br J Ophthalmol. 1972 Aug;56(8):632-5
pubmed: 5079413
Ophthalmology. 2011 Oct;118(10):2028-34
pubmed: 21705087
Retina. 2004 Oct;24(5):699-705
pubmed: 15492622
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):844
pubmed: 30696908
Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Sep;79(9):866
pubmed: 7488613
Am J Ophthalmol. 1987 Oct 15;104(4):430-1
pubmed: 3661656
Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;152(2):266-72
pubmed: 21664593