Comparing Predictions of a PBPK Model for Cyclosporine With Drug Levels From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
PBPK
cyclosporine
modeling and simulation
pharmacokinetics
therapeutic drug monitoring
Journal
Frontiers in pharmacology
ISSN: 1663-9812
Titre abrégé: Front Pharmacol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548923
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
19
11
2020
accepted:
27
04
2021
entrez:
31
5
2021
pubmed:
1
6
2021
medline:
1
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study compared simulations of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model implemented for cyclosporine with drug levels from therapeutic drug monitoring to evaluate the predictive performance of a PBPK model in a clinical population. Based on a literature search model parameters were determined. After calibrating the model using the pharmacokinetic profiles of healthy volunteers, 356 cyclosporine trough levels of 32 renal transplant outpatients were predicted based on their biometric parameters. Model performance was assessed by calculating absolute and relative deviations of predicted and observed trough levels. The median absolute deviation was 6 ng/ml (interquartile range: 30 to 31 ng/ml, minimum = -379 ng/ml, maximum = 139 ng/ml). 86% of predicted cyclosporine trough levels deviated less than twofold from observed values. The high intra-individual variability of observed cyclosporine levels was not fully covered by the PBPK model. Perspectively, consideration of clinical and additional patient-related factors may improve the model's performance. In summary, the current study has shown that PBPK modeling may offer valuable contributions for pharmacokinetic research in clinical drug therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34054518
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.630904
pii: 630904
pmc: PMC8161189
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
630904Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Zapke, Willmann, Grebe, Menke, Thürmann and Schmiedl.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SW was employed by the company Bayer AG, Research and Development, Clinical Pharmacometrics, Wuppertal, Germany. KM was employed by the company Bayer AG, Research and Development, Systems Pharmacology and Medicine I, Leverkusen, Germany. For this study, the software PK-Sim® (Open Systems Pharmacology Suite/Leverkusen, Germany) was used. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1986 Mar-Apr;11(2):107-32
pubmed: 3514043
Drug Metab Dispos. 2011 Sep;39(9):1633-42
pubmed: 21632965
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Sep;62(3):248-60
pubmed: 9333100
Clin Drug Investig. 2013 Jan;33(1):25-34
pubmed: 23179472
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000 Nov;68(5):478-86
pubmed: 11103750
Ann Transplant. 2008;13(3):11-8
pubmed: 18806728
Biochem Pharmacol. 1993 Jul 6;46(1):1-12
pubmed: 8394072
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(10):1013-34
pubmed: 16984214
Ther Drug Monit. 2006 Jun;28(3):312-20
pubmed: 16778713
J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 Mar;27(3):243-8
pubmed: 3680581
J Pharm Pharmacol. 1986 Aug;38(8):583-8
pubmed: 2876074
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Nov;58(5):492-7
pubmed: 7586942
J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;52(1 Suppl):91S-108S
pubmed: 22232759
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Mar 3;938(3):447-55
pubmed: 3280030
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Jul;56(7):759-779
pubmed: 28039606
Drug Metab Dispos. 2006 Feb;34(2):288-95
pubmed: 16303871
Br J Pharmacol. 1996 Aug;118(7):1841-7
pubmed: 8842452
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1999 Dec;27(6):597-623
pubmed: 11153448
Biochem Pharmacol. 1999 Mar 1;57(5):465-80
pubmed: 9952310
Mol Pharm. 2010 Oct 4;7(5):1596-607
pubmed: 20604570
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1981 Aug;9(4):503-12
pubmed: 7310648
Pharm Res. 2010 Dec;27(12):2602-13
pubmed: 20811933
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992 Nov;52(5):453-7
pubmed: 1424418
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(9):615-37
pubmed: 12126456
AAPS J. 2014 Mar;16(2):226-39
pubmed: 24399240
Pharm Res. 1995 Mar;12(3):413-20
pubmed: 7617530
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Dec;283(3):1552-62
pubmed: 9400033
N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 11;349(24):2326-33
pubmed: 14668458
Helv Chim Acta. 1976;59(4):1075-92
pubmed: 950308
Pharm Res. 2013 Mar;30(3):761-80
pubmed: 23179780
Transplantation. 1983 Jan;35(1):96-9
pubmed: 6337438
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;84(3):462-476
pubmed: 29194718
Drug Metab Dispos. 2000 May;28(5):582-9
pubmed: 10772639
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988 Jun;43(6):630-5
pubmed: 3378384
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2013 Jun 12;2:e47
pubmed: 23903405
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;4(2):261-74
pubmed: 22115405
J Pharm Pharmacol. 1991 Apr;43(4):287-9
pubmed: 1676746
J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 25;268(9):6077-80
pubmed: 7681059
Pharm Res. 1990 Jan;7(1):46-8
pubmed: 2300535
J Pharm Pharmacol. 1982 Nov;34(11):715-8
pubmed: 6129301
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jul;42(7):1037-47
pubmed: 18594053
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Jul;58(1):15-9
pubmed: 7628178
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jul;92(1):17-20
pubmed: 22713733
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 May;57(5):485-91
pubmed: 7768070
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000 Jun;11(6):1122-1131
pubmed: 10820177
Pharm Res. 2005 Dec;22(12):2141-51
pubmed: 16247711
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2005 Jun;1(1):159-68
pubmed: 16922658
Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9 Suppl 3:S1-155
pubmed: 19845597
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Nov;287(2):457-68
pubmed: 9808668
J Clin Invest. 1995 Oct;96(4):1698-705
pubmed: 7560060
J Pharm Sci. 2013 Sep;102(9):3205-19
pubmed: 23696038
Transplant Proc. 1985 Feb;17(1):286-289
pubmed: 21151751
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;5(10):516-531
pubmed: 27653238