Compassion-Focused Technologies: Reflections and Future Directions.

compassion digital technology extended reality human society perspective social media

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 07 09 2020
accepted: 19 04 2021
entrez: 31 5 2021
pubmed: 1 6 2021
medline: 1 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Compassion is a prosocial motivation that is critical to the development and survival of the human species. Cultivating compassion involves developing deep wisdom, insight, and understanding into the nature and causes of human suffering; and wisdom and commitment to take positive action to alleviate suffering. This perspective piece discusses how compassion relates to the context of modern technology, which has developed at a rapid pace in recent decades. While advances in digital technology build on humankind's vast capacity to develop practical tools that promise to enrich our lives and improve our social connections, in reality the effects are often far from benign. The motives underlying the development of many contemporary digital platforms seem rooted in competitiveness and capitalism; while modern social media and online platforms are having a profound and pervasive impact on the mental health and wellbeing of humans around the globe. Nonetheless, digital technology holds considerable potential to promote compassionate insight, wisdom, and prosocial behavior. We reflect on the current state of technology within human society and examine the notion of

Identifiants

pubmed: 34054636
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603618
pmc: PMC8155300
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

603618

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Day, Finkelstein, Field, Matthews, Kirby and Doty.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Oct;16(10):717-20
pubmed: 23745615
Psychol Psychother. 2019 Jun;92(2):164-189
pubmed: 30932302
Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):351-74
pubmed: 20438142
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 May;102(5):1045-62
pubmed: 22390226
Front Robot AI. 2018 Mar 22;5:26
pubmed: 33500913
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 May;15(2):180-98
pubmed: 20688954
Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Mar;53(1):6-41
pubmed: 24588760
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e69841
pubmed: 23967061
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Nov;31(7):1126-32
pubmed: 21840289
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):480-8
pubmed: 25706656
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Aug 19;10(1):1654782
pubmed: 31489138

Auteurs

Jamin Day (J)

College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, Family Action Center, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

Joel C Finkelstein (JC)

School of Medicine, The Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education (CCARE), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Brent A Field (BA)

Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.

Benjamin Matthews (B)

School of Creative Industries, College of Human and Social Futures, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

James N Kirby (JN)

School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

James R Doty (JR)

School of Medicine, The Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education (CCARE), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Classifications MeSH