Outcome of Peripartum Anesthesia in Women with Valvular Disease.
anesthesia
obstetric
pregnancy
valvular heart disease
Journal
Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care
ISSN: 2392-7518
Titre abrégé: Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care
Pays: Romania
ID NLM: 101681752
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
31
5
2021
pubmed:
1
6
2021
medline:
1
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Maternal heart disease is one of the major causes for mortality among parturients. In our study, we surveyed 220 patients with different valvular disorders who gave birth in our medical center in the years 2012-2018. The aim of this study was to characterize various valvular pathologies and compare the results of different anesthetic approaches. In this retrospective study, the computerized system and file archive were searched for maternal valvular pathologies according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9). The women included in the study were defined as American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA)-II or more, who suffer from valvular heart disease. The most common pathology was mitral valve regurgitation (57.73% of all cardiac patients). Most women were defined as having mild insufficiency, and 82.68% had normal vaginal delivery. In 17.3% of patients who had cesarean section, the main type of anesthesia was neuraxial anesthesia (95.45%). The second most common pathology was tricuspid valve regurgitation (22.73%). Most patients (78%) had normal vaginal delivery, and epidural analgesia was used in 64.1%. A minority of cardiac patients in our study were patients with stenotic heart diseases, such as aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis and pulmonic stenosis (8.18%, 4.55%, and 1.36%, respectively). No complications were observed in the peripartum period. The use of regional anesthesia is recommended for all valvular pathologies without exception, as we observed no cases in which the severity of cardiac condition had not allowed the use of various types of regional anesthesia, for surgery or vaginal delivery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34056118
doi: 10.2478/rjaic-2020-0001
pii: rjaic-2020-0001
pmc: PMC8158311
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
11-14Informations de copyright
© 2020 Daniel Shatalin et al., published by Sciendo.
Références
J Perinat Med. 2018 Apr 25;46(3):287-291
pubmed: 28599396
Lancet. 2006 Jun 3;367(9525):1819-29
pubmed: 16753484
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Sep;95(9):861-7
pubmed: 3191059
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 15;83(6):897-902
pubmed: 10190406
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;21(2):98-113
pubmed: 17302638
Acta Cardiol. 2016 Feb;71(1):55-60
pubmed: 26853254
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 May;28(4):593-605
pubmed: 24786801
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 1;37(3):893-9
pubmed: 11693767
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2006 Jan-Mar;29(1):32-52
pubmed: 16456361
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Jan;54(1):46-54
pubmed: 19764910
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Dec;75(1):43-50
pubmed: 9447346
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 May;38:83-92
pubmed: 30509678
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jun 19;49(24):2303-11
pubmed: 17572244
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Jun;62(3):301-6
pubmed: 23730034
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Oct;18(4):379-86
pubmed: 19733057
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Oct-Dec;20(4):295-302
pubmed: 17310670
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Spring;1(2):77-81
pubmed: 18769668
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2005 Sep;30(9):470-522
pubmed: 16129122
Cardiol Ther. 2017 Dec;6(2):157-173
pubmed: 28681178