SARS-Cov-2 viral and serological screening of staff in 31 European fertility units.
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
antibody tests
fertility clinics
seroprevalence
Journal
Human reproduction open
ISSN: 2399-3529
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101722764
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
31
07
2020
revised:
28
09
2020
entrez:
31
5
2021
pubmed:
1
6
2021
medline:
1
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
What is the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral presence and seroconversion in staff members in European fertility units prior to recommencement of clinical activity? A large proportion of fertility clinic staff remain susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 with no evidence of seroconversion, indicating that continued comprehensive risk mitigation strategies are essential. In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, routine fertility treatment was temporarily stopped in several European countries. The SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and seroconversion in fertility clinic staff, who are at potentially lower risk than routine healthcare workers, are unknown. This cross-sectional study included 554 staff in 16 European IVF clinics, 13 ultrasound clinics, one diagnostic laboratory and one head office in four European countries (Austria, Denmark, Germany and the UK) between 15 April and 30 June 2020. There were 554 staff members returning for resumption of clinical activity. Paired nucleic acid amplification tests of oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 and serological testing for SARS-CoV-2 IgG were performed. Of the 554 staff members tested, 0.19% (95% CI 0.03, 1.10%) had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 as detected by RT-PCR. In contrast, 23 staff members, i.e. 4.15% (95% CI 2.78, 6.15%), had antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, with a wide range of antibody titres. There was no evidence of differences in seroconversion between countries with estimates ranging from 2.78% (95% CI 0.77, 9.58) in Austria to 6.75% (95% CI 4.46, 10.1) for the UK. There was no strong evidence of clustering within the clinics, with 21 of the 30 facilities having no staff members affected (prevalence estimates ranging from 0% to 35%), and one clinic having seven staff members affected (35% (95% CI 18.1%, 56.7%)). The single staff member who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus was in the pre-symptomatic phase and was isolated, with no contacts having evidence of infection on repeat testing. This was a cross-sectional study prior to resumption of clinical activity, with repeat testing not undertaken. The low prevalence of seroconversion of fertility clinic staff highlights the need for continued comprehensive risk mitigation strategies and engagement with national endeavours to identify and isolate new cases and their contacts as we embark on the resumption of fertility services. The Fertility Partnership funded the study. S.M.N. reports personal fees from Access Fertility, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Ferring, grants and personal fees from Roche Diagnostics, personal fees from The Fertility Partnership and personal fees from Modern Fertility, outside the submitted work. T.C. reports personal fees from Merck and personal fees from Ferring, outside the submitted work. G.T. reports personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Ferring and personal fees from Roche Diagnostics, outside the submitted work. S.E. and P.S.G. report no conflicts of interest. N/A.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34056138
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa056
pii: hoaa056
pmc: PMC7799119
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
hoaa056Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6:CD013652
pubmed: 32584464
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Sep;41(3):483-499
pubmed: 32651106
Lancet. 2020 Aug 1;396(10247):313-319
pubmed: 32534626
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):
pubmed: 32381641
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Jun 11;5:139
pubmed: 33748431
JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1406-1407
pubmed: 32083643
Science. 2020 Jul 10;369(6500):208-211
pubmed: 32404476
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 19;382(12):1177-1179
pubmed: 32074444
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 28;382(22):2081-2090
pubmed: 32329971
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):565-574
pubmed: 32213337
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104437
pubmed: 32434708
JAMA. 2020 Jul 14;324(2):195-197
pubmed: 32539107
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2027-2034
pubmed: 32221519
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242
pubmed: 32091533
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2302-2315
pubmed: 32289214
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jan;6(1):e30-e38
pubmed: 33308423
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 8;11(1):3500
pubmed: 32641730
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2425-2427
pubmed: 32421144
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Thorax. 2020 Dec;75(12):1089-1094
pubmed: 32917840
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 22;17(9):e1003346
pubmed: 32960881
Blood Transfus. 2021 May;19(3):181-189
pubmed: 33539289
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):
pubmed: 32350047
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 28;382(22):2158-2160
pubmed: 32329972
Lancet Microbe. 2020 Nov;1(7):e283-e289
pubmed: 33015652
Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):535-544
pubmed: 32645347
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):425-429
pubmed: 32604404