Fluoroscopy of the Elbow: A Cadaveric Study Defining New Standard Projections to Visualize Important Anatomical Landmarks.


Journal

JB & JS open access
ISSN: 2472-7245
Titre abrégé: JB JS Open Access
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101726219

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 31 5 2021
pubmed: 1 6 2021
medline: 1 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite new 3-dimensional imaging modalities, 2-dimensional fluoroscopy remains the standard intraoperative imaging modality. The elbow has complex anatomy, and defined standard fluoroscopic projections are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to define standard projections of the elbow for intraoperative fluoroscopy. This study consisted of 2 parts. In part I, dissected cadaveric elbows were examined under fluoroscopy, and their radiographic anatomical features were assessed, with focus on projections showing defined anatomical landmarks. In part II, projections from part I were verified on entire cadavers to simulate intraoperative imaging. Standard projections for anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views as well as oblique and axial views were recorded. Eight standardized projections could be defined and included 3 AP, 1 lateral, 2 oblique, and 2 axial views. By applying these specific projections, we could visualize the epicondyles, the trochlea with its medial and lateral borders, the capitellum, the olecranon, the greater sigmoid notch, the coronoid process including its anteromedial facet, the proximal radioulnar joint with the radial tuberosity, and the anterior and posterior joint lines of the distal part of the humerus. These standard projections were reliably obtained using a specific sequence. Knowledge about radiographic anatomy and standard projections is essential for visualizing important landmarks. With the presented standard projections of the elbow, important anatomical landmarks can be clearly examined. Thus, fluoroscopic visualization of anatomical fracture reduction and correct implant placement should be facilitated. This basic science cadaveric study defines fluoroscopic standard projections of the elbow essential for visualization of anatomical landmarks during surgery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite new 3-dimensional imaging modalities, 2-dimensional fluoroscopy remains the standard intraoperative imaging modality. The elbow has complex anatomy, and defined standard fluoroscopic projections are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to define standard projections of the elbow for intraoperative fluoroscopy.
METHODS METHODS
This study consisted of 2 parts. In part I, dissected cadaveric elbows were examined under fluoroscopy, and their radiographic anatomical features were assessed, with focus on projections showing defined anatomical landmarks. In part II, projections from part I were verified on entire cadavers to simulate intraoperative imaging. Standard projections for anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views as well as oblique and axial views were recorded.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eight standardized projections could be defined and included 3 AP, 1 lateral, 2 oblique, and 2 axial views. By applying these specific projections, we could visualize the epicondyles, the trochlea with its medial and lateral borders, the capitellum, the olecranon, the greater sigmoid notch, the coronoid process including its anteromedial facet, the proximal radioulnar joint with the radial tuberosity, and the anterior and posterior joint lines of the distal part of the humerus. These standard projections were reliably obtained using a specific sequence.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Knowledge about radiographic anatomy and standard projections is essential for visualizing important landmarks. With the presented standard projections of the elbow, important anatomical landmarks can be clearly examined. Thus, fluoroscopic visualization of anatomical fracture reduction and correct implant placement should be facilitated.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE CONCLUSIONS
This basic science cadaveric study defines fluoroscopic standard projections of the elbow essential for visualization of anatomical landmarks during surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34056508
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00160
pii: JBJSOA-D-20-00160
pmc: PMC8154458
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure: The authors indicated that no external funding was received for any aspect of this work. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A277).

Références

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):4019-28
pubmed: 22975150
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Nov;139(11):1543-1549
pubmed: 30989412
Hand (N Y). 2014 Dec;9(4):516-21
pubmed: 25414615
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Sep;207(3):484-94
pubmed: 27276101
Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Apr 03;6(2):e407-e411
pubmed: 28580260
Hand (N Y). 2017 Nov;12(6):551-556
pubmed: 29091485
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2017 Nov;12(3):133-139
pubmed: 28593358
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 20;93(14):1339-46
pubmed: 21792501
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec 1;92(17):2785-91
pubmed: 21123608
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Nov;25(11):1874-1881
pubmed: 27364146
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(1):26-30
pubmed: 19788958
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Dec;128(12):1419-24
pubmed: 18791727
Ann Anat. 1992 Jun;174(3):185-95
pubmed: 1503236
J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Jan;33(1):26-31
pubmed: 23232375
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013 Sep;38(7):751-7
pubmed: 23390154
Unfallchirurg. 2007 Jan;110(1):41-8
pubmed: 17177044
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Dec;39(12):2534-41
pubmed: 25459959
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(5):449-54
pubmed: 25171678
Hand (N Y). 2014 Dec;9(4):511-5
pubmed: 25414614
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jun;35(6):900-4
pubmed: 20478664
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Jun;37(5):407-11
pubmed: 22064731
Clin Anat. 2013 Jul;26(5):564-71
pubmed: 23408386
Injury. 2007 Oct;38(10):1163-9
pubmed: 17884047
Unfallchirurg. 2013 Feb;116(2):185-90
pubmed: 23404358
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Jun;138(6):1186-8
pubmed: 6979227
J Trauma. 2009 Jan;66(1):232-8
pubmed: 19131832
BMC Med Imaging. 2016 Mar 18;16:24
pubmed: 26987661
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 May;37(5):963-7
pubmed: 22480500
Radiology. 1986 Jul;160(1):167-73
pubmed: 3715029
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Dec;43(12):1135.e1-1135.e8
pubmed: 29891268

Auteurs

Sebastian A Müller (SA)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery (S.A.M., C.B., A.M.M., and D.R.) and Institute of Anatomy (M.M.-G.), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Lars Adolfsson (L)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Cornelia Baum (C)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery (S.A.M., C.B., A.M.M., and D.R.) and Institute of Anatomy (M.M.-G.), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Magdalena Müller-Gerbl (M)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery (S.A.M., C.B., A.M.M., and D.R.) and Institute of Anatomy (M.M.-G.), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Andreas M Müller (AM)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery (S.A.M., C.B., A.M.M., and D.R.) and Institute of Anatomy (M.M.-G.), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Daniel Rikli (D)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery (S.A.M., C.B., A.M.M., and D.R.) and Institute of Anatomy (M.M.-G.), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH