Outcomes of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention in Tanzania's Lake Zone: a prospective, longitudinal study.
data quality
outcomes
sepsis
surgical quality
surgical safety checklist
surgical site infections
Journal
International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
ISSN: 1464-3677
Titre abrégé: Int J Qual Health Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9434628
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jun 2021
29 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
30
10
2020
revised:
12
04
2021
accepted:
30
05
2021
pubmed:
1
6
2021
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
31
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evidence-based strategies for improving surgical quality and patient outcomes in low-resource settings are a priority. To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention (Safe Surgery 2020) on (1) adherence to safety practices, teamwork and communication, and documentation in patient files, and (2) incidence of maternal sepsis, postoperative sepsis, and surgical site infection. We conducted a prospective, longitudinal study in 10 intervention and 10 control facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone, across a 3-month pre-intervention period in 2018 and 3-month post-intervention period in 2019. SS2020 is a multicomponent intervention to support four surgical quality areas: (i) leadership and teamwork, (ii) evidence-based surgery, anesthesia and equipment sterilization practices, (iii) data completeness and (iv) infrastructure. Surgical team members received training and mentorship, and each facility received up to a $10 000 infrastructure grant. Inpatients undergoing major surgery and postpartum women were followed during their stay up to 30 days. We assessed adherence to 14 safety and teamwork and communication measures through direct observation in the operating room. We identified maternal sepsis (vaginal or cesarean delivery), postoperative sepsis and SSIs prospectively through daily surveillance and assessed medical record completeness retrospectively through chart review. We compared changes in surgical quality outcomes between intervention and control facilities using difference-in-differences analyses to determine areas of impact. Safety practices improved significantly by an additional 20.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.2-33.7%; P = 0.003) and teamwork and communication conversations by 33.3% (95% CI, 5.7-60.8%; P = 0.02) in intervention facilities compared to control facilities. Maternal sepsis rates reduced significantly by 1% (95% CI, 0.1-1.9%; P = 0.02). Documentation completeness improved by 41.8% (95% CI, 27.4-56.1%; P < 0.001) for sepsis and 22.3% (95% CI, 4.7-39.8%; P = 0.01) for SSIs. Our findings demonstrate the benefit of the SS2020 approach. Improvement was observed in adherence to safety practices, teamwork and communication, and data quality, and there was a reduction in maternal sepsis rates. Our results support the emerging evidence that improving surgical quality in a low-resource setting requires a focus on the surgical system and culture. Investigation in diverse contexts is necessary to confirm and generalize our results and to understand how to adapt the intervention for different settings. Further work is also necessary to assess the long-term effect and sustainability of such interventions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Evidence-based strategies for improving surgical quality and patient outcomes in low-resource settings are a priority.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention (Safe Surgery 2020) on (1) adherence to safety practices, teamwork and communication, and documentation in patient files, and (2) incidence of maternal sepsis, postoperative sepsis, and surgical site infection.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a prospective, longitudinal study in 10 intervention and 10 control facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone, across a 3-month pre-intervention period in 2018 and 3-month post-intervention period in 2019. SS2020 is a multicomponent intervention to support four surgical quality areas: (i) leadership and teamwork, (ii) evidence-based surgery, anesthesia and equipment sterilization practices, (iii) data completeness and (iv) infrastructure. Surgical team members received training and mentorship, and each facility received up to a $10 000 infrastructure grant. Inpatients undergoing major surgery and postpartum women were followed during their stay up to 30 days. We assessed adherence to 14 safety and teamwork and communication measures through direct observation in the operating room. We identified maternal sepsis (vaginal or cesarean delivery), postoperative sepsis and SSIs prospectively through daily surveillance and assessed medical record completeness retrospectively through chart review. We compared changes in surgical quality outcomes between intervention and control facilities using difference-in-differences analyses to determine areas of impact.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Safety practices improved significantly by an additional 20.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.2-33.7%; P = 0.003) and teamwork and communication conversations by 33.3% (95% CI, 5.7-60.8%; P = 0.02) in intervention facilities compared to control facilities. Maternal sepsis rates reduced significantly by 1% (95% CI, 0.1-1.9%; P = 0.02). Documentation completeness improved by 41.8% (95% CI, 27.4-56.1%; P < 0.001) for sepsis and 22.3% (95% CI, 4.7-39.8%; P = 0.01) for SSIs.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings demonstrate the benefit of the SS2020 approach. Improvement was observed in adherence to safety practices, teamwork and communication, and data quality, and there was a reduction in maternal sepsis rates. Our results support the emerging evidence that improving surgical quality in a low-resource setting requires a focus on the surgical system and culture. Investigation in diverse contexts is necessary to confirm and generalize our results and to understand how to adapt the intervention for different settings. Further work is also necessary to assess the long-term effect and sustainability of such interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34057187
pii: 6289905
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab087
pmc: PMC8240014
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : GE Foundation
ID : 28045607
Organisme : ELMA Philanthropies
ID : 17-F0012
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care.
Références
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Oct;223(4):568-580.e2
pubmed: 27469627
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Apr 1;31(3):166-172
pubmed: 30020489
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Apr 16;4(2):e001282
pubmed: 31139445
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33
pubmed: 25103301
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1765526
pubmed: 32476620
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 11;16(1):60
pubmed: 27515450
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 06;2:CD012653
pubmed: 29406579
J Perioper Pract. 2018 Dec;28(12):334-338
pubmed: 29737922
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e031800
pubmed: 31594896
Med Care. 2018 Jan;56(1):97-105
pubmed: 29112050
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1973-1982
pubmed: 30929893
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Aug;23(8):639-50
pubmed: 24497526
Br J Surg. 2021 Jun 22;108(6):727-734
pubmed: 34157086
Int J Womens Health. 2019 May 09;11:309-318
pubmed: 31191039
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017 Jan 10;6:6
pubmed: 28078082
Lancet. 2018 Apr 21;391(10130):1589-1598
pubmed: 29306587
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2014 Aug 11;3:25
pubmed: 25126415
World J Surg. 2015 Feb;39(2):350-5
pubmed: 25358418
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Feb;53(2):143-51
pubmed: 19032571
Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr;41(2):307-34
pubmed: 16584451
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jun;38(6):254-60
pubmed: 22737776
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 10;16(12):e1002984
pubmed: 31821329
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252
pubmed: 30196093
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 May;18(5):507-515
pubmed: 29519766
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96
pubmed: 10196487