Higher rate of en bloc resection with underwater than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis.


Journal

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN: 1878-3562
Titre abrégé: Dig Liver Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100958385

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 07 04 2021
revised: 01 05 2021
accepted: 03 05 2021
pubmed: 2 6 2021
medline: 3 2 2022
entrez: 1 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Previous meta-analysis including nonrandomized studies showed marginal benefit of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(U-EMR) compared to conventional EMR(C-EMR) in terms of polypectomy outcomes. We evaluated U-EMR compared to C-EMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps with respect to effectiveness and safety by analyzing only randomized controlled trials(RCTs). PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for RCTs published until 11/2020, evaluating U-EMR vs. C-EMR regarding en bloc resection, post-endoscopic resection adenoma recurrence, complete resection, adverse events rates and difference in resection time. Abstracts from Digestive Disease Week, United European Gastroenterology Week and ESGE Days meetings were also searched. Effect size on outcomes is presented as risk ratio(RR; 95% confidence interval[CI]) or mean difference(MD; 95%CI). The I Six RCTs analyzing outcomes from 1157 colorectal polypectomies(U-EMR589;C-EMR,568) were included. U-EMR associated with significant higher rate of en bloc resection compared to C-EMR [RR(95%CI):1.26(1.01-1.58); Chi² for heterogeneity=30.43, P<0.0001; I²=84%, GRADE: Very low]. This effect was more prominent regarding resection of polyps sized ≥20 mm compared to polyps <20 mm [RR(95%CI):1.64(1.22-2.20) vs. 1.10(0.98-1.23)]. Post-resection recurrence [RR(95%CI):0.52(0.28-0.94);GRADE:Low] was lower significantly in U-EMR group. In contrast, no significant difference was detected between U-EMR and C-EMR regarding complete resection [RR(95%CI): 1.06(0.91-1.24) GRADE:Very low] and adverse events occurrence[RR(95%CI):1.00 (0.72-1.39); GRADE:Low]. Meta-analysis of RCTs supports that U-EMR resection achieves higher rate of en bloc resection compared to conventional EMR. This effect is driven when resecting large(≥20 mm) polyps.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34059445
pii: S1590-8658(21)00244-9
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.05.001
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Water 059QF0KO0R

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

958-964

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Georgios Tziatzios (G)

Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ''Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Paraskevas Gkolfakis (P)

Department of Gastroenterology Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Konstantinos Triantafyllou (K)

Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ''Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece. Electronic address: ktriant@med.uoa.gr.

Lorenzo Fuccio (L)

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

Antonio Facciorusso (A)

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Viale L Pinto 1, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Ioannis S Papanikolaou (IS)

Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ''Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Giulio Antonelli (G)

Gastroenterology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Sandra Nagl (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Alanna Ebigbo (A)

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Andreas Probst (A)

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Cesare Hassan (C)

Gastroenterology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Helmut Messmann (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH