Association Between Receipt of Cancer Screening and All-Cause Mortality in Older Adults.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2021
01 06 2021
Historique:
entrez:
1
6
2021
pubmed:
2
6
2021
medline:
30
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Guidelines recommend against routine breast and prostate cancer screenings in older adults with less than 10 years' life expectancy. One study using a claims-based prognostic index showed that receipt of cancer screening itself was associated with lower mortality, suggesting that the index may misclassify individuals when used to inform cancer screening, but this finding was attributed to residual confounding because the index did not account for functional status. To examine whether cancer screening remains significantly associated with all-cause mortality in older adults after accounting for both comorbidities and functional status. This cohort study included individuals older than 65 years who were eligible for breast or prostate cancer screening and who participated in the 2004 Health and Retirement Study. Data were linked to Medicare claims from 2001 to 2015. Data analysis was conducted from January to November 2020. A Cox model was used to estimate the association between all-cause mortality over 10 years and receipt of screening mammogram or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, adjusting for variables in a prognostic index that included age, sex, comorbidities, and functional status. Potential confounders (ie, education, income, marital status, geographic region, cognition, self-reported health, self-care, and self-perceived mortality risk) of the association between cancer screening and mortality were also tested. The breast cancer screening cohort included 3257 women (mean [SD] age, 77.8 [7.5] years); the prostate cancer screening cohort included 2085 men (mean [SD] age, 76.1 [6.8] years). Receipt of screening mammogram was associated with lower hazard of all-cause mortality after accounting for all index variables (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74). A weaker, but still statistically significant, association was found for screening PSA (aHR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99). None of the potential confounders attenuated the association between screening and mortality except for cognition, which attenuated the aHR for mammogram from 0.67 (95% CI, 0.60-0.74) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64-0.82) and the aHR for PSA from 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78-0.99) to 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80-1.05), making PSA screening no longer statistically significant. In this study, cognition attenuated the observed association between cancer screening and mortality among older adults. These findings suggest that existing mortality prediction algorithms may be missing important variables that are associated with receipt of cancer screening and long-term mortality. Relying solely on algorithms to determine cancer screening may misclassify individuals as having limited life expectancy and stop screening prematurely. Screening decisions need to be individualized and not solely dependent on life expectancy prediction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34061202
pii: 2780538
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12062
pmc: PMC8170538
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2112062Références
Med Care. 2014 Jun;52(6):490-5
pubmed: 24828844
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Nov 19;159(10):667-76
pubmed: 24247672
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 May 1;176(5):671-8
pubmed: 27064895
Ann Intern Med. 2013 May 21;158(10):761-769
pubmed: 23567643
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Jun;68(9):1-77
pubmed: 32501199
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Apr;58(4):674-80
pubmed: 20345867
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Mar;61(3):388-95
pubmed: 23414437
JAMA. 2012 Jan 11;307(2):182-92
pubmed: 22235089
Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):718-25
pubmed: 25984847
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96
pubmed: 26757170
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 15;161(2):104-12
pubmed: 25023249
JAMA. 2001 Jun 6;285(21):2750-6
pubmed: 11386931
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):196-203
pubmed: 30592477
Am J Public Health. 2010 Oct;100(10):1917-23
pubmed: 20075325
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Jun;51(3):327-336
pubmed: 27822612
Med Care. 2014 Aug;52(8):688-94
pubmed: 25023914
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Nov;31(11):1354
pubmed: 27488971
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1016-1030
pubmed: 28555630
Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):712-7
pubmed: 25984846
Med Care. 2014 Jul;52(7):e44-51
pubmed: 22922433
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Feb;28(2):292-8
pubmed: 23054920
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):419-26
pubmed: 23659877
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1121-1128
pubmed: 28604917
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Nov;31(11):1308-1314
pubmed: 27364834
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Mar 10;168(5):514-20
pubmed: 18332298
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):307-9
pubmed: 25506678
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 19;11(7):e0159273
pubmed: 27434271
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):576-85
pubmed: 24671021
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Mar 1;72(3):410-416
pubmed: 27522061
BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e8441
pubmed: 23299842
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913
pubmed: 29801017
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575
pubmed: 27304597
Cancer Causes Control. 2008 May;19(4):339-59
pubmed: 18085415
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jun;65(6):1310-1315
pubmed: 28221669
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Sep 15;178(6):974-83
pubmed: 23851579
Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;50(Pt A):68-75
pubmed: 28822325
JAMA. 2006 Feb 15;295(7):801-8
pubmed: 16478903
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599-614
pubmed: 26501536
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):378-86
pubmed: 22393133
JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2336-42
pubmed: 17105796