Apical Pressure Generated Using Conventional Syringe Irrigation in Immature Teeth-An In Vitro Study.
NaOCl accident
dental trauma
endodontics
open apex
root canal treatment
sodium hypochlorite
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 May 2021
15 May 2021
Historique:
received:
20
04
2021
revised:
07
05
2021
accepted:
10
05
2021
entrez:
2
6
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
3
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This in vitro study aimed to evaluate apical pressure during irrigant delivery with syringe irrigation in immature teeth with an open apical foramen. Conventional syringe irrigation was performed in a 3D-printed immature incisor. A 5 mL syringe combined with 25 G and 30 G cannulas was used. Open-ended and side-vented needle tip designs were assessed. Cannulas were placed at tooth length (TL), TL -1 mm, TL -2 mm, and TL -4 mm. The syringe plunger was moved with a force of 10 N, 20 N, 40 N, and 80 N to simulate clinical conditions. A pressure sensor measured periapical pressures during irrigation. Each experiment was repeated 10 times. Data were analyzed descriptively (maximum, mean, standard deviation, 95% CI) with the critical threshold indicative of extrusion set at 7.64 mbar. 30 G cannulas with both needle tip designs never exceeded the threshold at any TL with a plunger force of 10-40 N. At 80 N, 30 G open-ended cannulas exceeded the threshold in 10%, 30 G side-vented in 20-60% of the measurements. At any TL, 25 G open-ended cannulas and 25 G side-vented cannulas never crossed the threshold with forces of 10-20 N and 10 N, respectively. Consequently, 30 G cannulas with both designs can be recommended for irrigant delivery in immature teeth. 25 G cannulas ought to be used with caution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34063549
pii: ma14102580
doi: 10.3390/ma14102580
pmc: PMC8156040
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Endod. 1992 Dec;18(12):605-12
pubmed: 1298800
J Endod. 2010 May;36(5):884-9
pubmed: 20416439
J Endod. 2016 Jan;42(1):135-9
pubmed: 26547720
J Dent. 2013 Jul;41(7):636-41
pubmed: 23603086
Int Endod J. 2000 May;33(3):186-93
pubmed: 11307434
J Endod. 2013 Apr;39(4):529-33
pubmed: 23522551
J Endod. 2012 Jan;38(1):37-40
pubmed: 22152617
J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):935-48
pubmed: 23994710
J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):618-24
pubmed: 24767553
J Endod. 2013 Apr;39(4):521-4
pubmed: 23522549
Int Endod J. 2020 May;53(5):671-679
pubmed: 31814134
Resuscitation. 2005 Feb;64(2):193-9
pubmed: 15680529
J Endod. 2013 Apr;39(4):511-5
pubmed: 23522547
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971 Jun;31(6):810-8
pubmed: 5280463
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Mar;101(3):402-4
pubmed: 16504876
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974 Oct;38(4):633-8
pubmed: 4547330
J Endod. 2008 Nov;34(11):1346-1350
pubmed: 18928844
Int Endod J. 2007 Jul;40(7):504-13
pubmed: 17326784
Int J Dent. 2018 Oct 16;2018:2514243
pubmed: 30410540
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Sep;106(3):e80-3
pubmed: 18602848
Swiss Dent J. 2019 Dec 23;130(1):18-29
pubmed: 31867941
J Clin Exp Dent. 2012 Jul 01;4(3):e194-8
pubmed: 24558554
J Endod. 1989 Oct;15(10):490-2
pubmed: 2639943
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 02;13(1):
pubmed: 31906551