Proof of Concept of a Binary Blood Assay for Predicting Radiosensitivity.
biological marker
cancer
normal tissue complication probability
pATM
radiation-induced toxicity prediction
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 May 2021
19 May 2021
Historique:
received:
29
03
2021
revised:
12
05
2021
accepted:
13
05
2021
entrez:
2
6
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
3
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Radiation therapy (RT), either alone or in combination with surgery and/or chemotherapy is a keystone of cancers treatment. Early toxicity is common, sometimes leading to discontinuation of treatment. Recent studies stressed the role of the phosphorylated ATM (pATM) protein in RT-toxicity genesis and its ability in predicting individual radiosensitivity (IRS) in fibroblasts. Here we assessed the reliability of the pATM quantification in lymphocytes to predict IRS. A first retrospective study was performed on 150 blood lymphocytes of patients with several cancer types. Patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the grade of experienced toxicity. The global quantity of pATM molecules was assessed by ELISA on lymphocytes to determine the best threshold value. Then, the binary assay was assessed on a validation cohort of 36 patients with head and neck cancers. The quantity of pATM molecules in each sample of the training cohort was found in agreement with the observed Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades with an AUC = 0.71 alone and of 0.77 combined to chemotherapy information. In the validation cohort, the same test was conducted with the following performances: sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.54, AUC = 0.70 and 0.72 combined to chemotherapy. This study provides the basis of an easy to perform assay for clinical use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34069662
pii: cancers13102477
doi: 10.3390/cancers13102477
pmc: PMC8160794
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Mol Neurobiol. 2018 Jun;55(6):4973-4983
pubmed: 28786016
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Feb 1;100(2):353-360
pubmed: 29353653
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 1;96(3):629-36
pubmed: 27681759
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 19;7(16):21416-27
pubmed: 26982083
Acta Oncol. 2001;40(6):702-11
pubmed: 11765064
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):450-60
pubmed: 26867874
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Mar 1;103(3):709-718
pubmed: 30342967
Int J Radiat Biol. 2016;92(3):117-31
pubmed: 26907628
Semin Oncol. 2003 Aug;30(4 Suppl 9):3-10
pubmed: 12908132
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jul 1;101(3):690-693
pubmed: 29893278
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jun 28;11(7):
pubmed: 31261657
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Dec 1;36(5):1065-75
pubmed: 8985028
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15;89(4):709-13
pubmed: 24969789
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1997;9(5):308-12
pubmed: 9368726
Mol Neurobiol. 2014 Jun;49(3):1200-11
pubmed: 24277524
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Sep;31(9):753-66
pubmed: 23963867
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):65-77
pubmed: 22169268
EBioMedicine. 2015 Oct 25;2(12):1965-73
pubmed: 26844275
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017 Oct;27(4):310-315
pubmed: 28865513
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2532-2542
pubmed: 28655021
Int J Radiat Biol. 2008 Feb;84(2):107-25
pubmed: 18246480
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Oct 15;11(20):7426-33
pubmed: 16243816
Int J Radiat Biol. 2020 Mar;96(3):297-323
pubmed: 31852363
DNA Repair (Amst). 2019 Aug;80:1-7
pubmed: 31176958
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Oct 1;14(19):6284-8
pubmed: 18829510
Radiother Oncol. 2003 Mar;66(3):253-62
pubmed: 12742264