Agricultural Holdings and Slaughterhouses' Impact on Patterns of Pathological Findings Observed during Post-Mortem Meat Inspection.
pathological findings
permutation ANOVA
pig production
post-mortem meat inspection
slaughter
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 May 2021
18 May 2021
Historique:
received:
22
03
2021
revised:
07
05
2021
accepted:
09
05
2021
entrez:
2
6
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
3
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Meat inspection data can provide valuable information about herd health to producers, veterinarians and veterinary authorities and can be used as a feedback system for farmers to improve their herd management. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of agricultural holdings, slaughterhouses and time periods (quarters) on the occurrence and composition of the prevalence of post-mortem findings of 4 million pigs slaughtered in Austria in 2016, by applying a permutation multivariate analysis of variance. Pneumonia (21.9%) and milk spots (19.9%) were the most frequently recorded conditions. Our analysis indicated a statistically significant influence of all three considered factors (agricultural holdings, slaughterhouses and periods) on the prevalence of post-mortem findings. The observed prevalence could not only be explained by the differences between the farms of origin and slaughterhouses but also by the variability within the slaughterhouses. Much of the explained variance of the prevalence was due to differences between producers (mean R
Identifiants
pubmed: 34069903
pii: ani11051442
doi: 10.3390/ani11051442
pmc: PMC8157594
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
ID : VetAustria
Organisme : Austrian Federal Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs, Health and Consumer Protection
ID : VetAustria
Références
Can J Vet Res. 1990 Apr;54(2):274-7
pubmed: 2357665
BMC Vet Res. 2011 Dec 30;7:82
pubmed: 22208847
Vet J. 2010 Jun;184(3):326-33
pubmed: 19527939
Vet J. 2015 Oct;206(1):30-8
pubmed: 26206322
Meat Sci. 2015 Oct;108:106-8
pubmed: 26072730
Vet J. 2011 Mar;187(3):388-92
pubmed: 20122861
Prev Vet Med. 2001 Apr 13;49(1-2):41-54
pubmed: 11267687
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jun 05;5:92
pubmed: 29922682
Vet J. 2013 Nov;198(2):508-12
pubmed: 24268483
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2010 Nov-Dec;123(11-12):468-76
pubmed: 21141276
Vet Microbiol. 2010 May 19;142(3-4):217-24
pubmed: 19913367
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Sep 1;111(3-4):278-85
pubmed: 23809773
Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 1988;84:366-8
pubmed: 3232641
Prev Vet Med. 2002 Sep 30;55(2):121-35
pubmed: 12350316
Vet J. 2017 May;223:21-26
pubmed: 28671066
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Sep;182:105091
pubmed: 32683190
Front Vet Sci. 2016 Mar 14;3:24
pubmed: 27014706
Vet J. 2012 Jul;193(1):234-9
pubmed: 22182431
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Jan 5;14(1):6
pubmed: 29304804
Prev Vet Med. 2003 Mar 20;57(3):117-25
pubmed: 12581595
Prev Vet Med. 2010 May 1;94(3-4):165-9
pubmed: 20132995
Vet Parasitol. 2010 Oct 29;173(3-4):271-9
pubmed: 20667659
Prev Vet Med. 2018 May 1;153:64-70
pubmed: 29653736
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Oct 1;146:1-9
pubmed: 28992912
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Apr 27;10:98
pubmed: 24766795
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 18;10(10):
pubmed: 33080947
Meat Sci. 2012 Jan;90(1):269-71
pubmed: 21733635
Acta Vet Scand. 2015 Mar 29;57:18
pubmed: 25887329
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Sep 1;144:20-28
pubmed: 28716200
Porcine Health Manag. 2015 Apr 16;1:4
pubmed: 28405413
Vet Parasitol. 2012 Feb 28;184(1):83-7
pubmed: 21889266
Ital J Food Saf. 2018 Mar 31;7(1):6899
pubmed: 29732323