Enhanced Recovery after Renal Transplantation Decreases Recipients' Urological Complications and Hospital Stay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

enhanced recovery after surgery kidney transplantation length of hospital stay postoperative complications readmissions solid organ transplantation urological complications

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 May 2021
Historique:
received: 17 03 2021
revised: 10 05 2021
accepted: 20 05 2021
entrez: 2 6 2021
pubmed: 3 6 2021
medline: 3 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The objective of this study was to compare enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) against traditional perioperative care for renal transplant recipients. Outcome measures included complications, length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, graft and patient survival up to one-year post-transplant. We initially screened Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases. We identified 3029 records. From these, 114 full texts were scrutinized for inclusion. Finally, 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis corresponding to 2037 renal transplant recipients. ERAS resulted in lower incidence of urological complications (95CI: 0.276, 0.855) (I

Identifiants

pubmed: 34070325
pii: jcm10112286
doi: 10.3390/jcm10112286
pmc: PMC8197515
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Imperial College London
ID : not yet granted.

Références

Am J Transplant. 2011 Oct;11(10):2093-109
pubmed: 21883901
Exp Clin Transplant. 2016 Aug;14(4):385-8
pubmed: 27506257
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Jan;395(1):11-7
pubmed: 19763604
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Nov;59(10):1212-31
pubmed: 26346577
Curr Urol Rep. 2020 Jan 18;21(1):3
pubmed: 31960193
Exp Clin Transplant. 2018 Apr;16(2):127-132
pubmed: 28836932
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
J Clin Med. 2019 May 16;8(5):
pubmed: 31100847
Transplant Proc. 2017 Mar;49(2):297-302
pubmed: 28219588
Springerplus. 2016 Feb 29;5:207
pubmed: 27026903
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 23;10(1):
pubmed: 33374793
Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:175-181
pubmed: 31600570
Transplantation. 2005 Oct 15;80(7):877-82
pubmed: 16249733
Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):57-65
pubmed: 28437313
Clin Transplant. 2018 Feb;32(2):
pubmed: 29220082
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5
pubmed: 10740540
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Oct;89(10):1319-1323
pubmed: 31576647
Am J Transplant. 2004 Nov;4(11):1889-96
pubmed: 15476491
World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1531-41
pubmed: 24368573
Health Policy. 1998 Jun;44(3):215-32
pubmed: 10182294
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jul;26(3):450-3
pubmed: 21116375
Urol Int. 2016;96(2):152-6
pubmed: 26535578
Urol Int. 2012;89(1):89-92
pubmed: 22738941

Auteurs

Apostolos Prionas (A)

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Department of General Surgery, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London RM7 0AG, UK.

Charles Craddock (C)

Department of General Surgery, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London RM7 0AG, UK.

Vassilios Papalois (V)

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Classifications MeSH