Survival of Single-Unit Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal (PFM) and Metal Crowns Placed by Students at an Australian University Dental Clinic over a Five-Year Period.
complications
crown
failures
student
survival
Journal
Dentistry journal
ISSN: 2304-6767
Titre abrégé: Dent J (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101716125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 May 2021
28 May 2021
Historique:
received:
06
04
2021
revised:
14
05
2021
accepted:
21
05
2021
entrez:
2
6
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
3
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the survival rate of single-unit porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) and metal crowns placed by dental students at an Australian university undergraduate dental clinic over a five-year period. Complications and the incidences of crown failures were recorded. Clinical records pertaining to single-unit PFM and metal crowns inserted over a five-year period were reviewed, including patient-related, tooth-related, and procedural factors for each crown. Crowns were evaluated as surviving, surviving with complications, or failed. Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis was used to estimate survival rate., This study is based on a sample of 232 (78.4%) PFM crowns and 64 (21.6%) metal crowns inserted between 2014 and 2018. Cumulatively, 224 (75.7%) were surviving, 48 (16.2%) were surviving but previously had complications, and 24 (8.1%) failed. The 5-year cumulative survival rate of all PFM and metal crowns was 83.9% (0.839 ± 0.038, Kaplan-Meier). The average survival time for all crowns was 4.432 ± 0.089 years. Comparatively, PFM crowns had a higher survival rate at 1 year (0.972 ± 0.010) and 2 years (0.919 ± 0.017), compared to metal crowns at 1 year (0.964 ± 0.011) and 2 years (0.894± 0.018). The survival rate of metal crowns remained constant from 2 years to 4 years and thereafter, whereas there was a continued decline in the survival rate of PFM crowns to 83.2% (0.832 ± 0.038) at 4 years and thereafter. Crowns placed on premolars had the highest cumulative survival rate whereas those placed on molars exhibited the lowest survival rate for the duration of the study period. Despite single-unit PFM crowns having a higher 1- and 2-year survival rate compared to metal crowns, metal crowns had a higher survival rate at 4 years and thereafter. Survival rates are comparable to previous studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34071165
pii: dj9060060
doi: 10.3390/dj9060060
pmc: PMC8227166
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):102-11
pubmed: 22192254
Int J Prosthodont. 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):153-60
pubmed: 24596914
Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2016 Feb 1;2(1):43-48
pubmed: 28642911
Int J Prosthodont. 2008 Jul-Aug;21(4):307-11
pubmed: 18717088
J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Mar;40(3):228-37
pubmed: 23211063
J Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;23(6):421-33
pubmed: 24947268
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Apr;113(4):289-94
pubmed: 25702968
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Apr;79(4):459-64
pubmed: 9576323
J Dent. 2020 Oct;101:103459
pubmed: 32866553
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jun;119(6):935-941
pubmed: 28969914
J Dent Educ. 2007 Nov;71(11):1414-9
pubmed: 17971570
J Dent. 2009 Jan;37(1):12-24
pubmed: 18487003
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:199-214
pubmed: 30328190
Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):493-502
pubmed: 21209982
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(12):2063-70
pubmed: 22189731
J Dent Educ. 2017 Jun;81(6):732-743
pubmed: 28572420
J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Feb;30(2):165-70
pubmed: 12535143