Molecular Dynamics of Cobalt Protoporphyrin Antagonism of the Cancer Suppressor REV-ERBβ.
Binding Sites
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical
/ methods
Cobalt
/ chemistry
Heme
/ chemistry
Humans
Iron
/ chemistry
Kinetics
Ligands
Metals
Molecular Conformation
Molecular Docking Simulation
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Peptides
/ chemistry
Photosensitizing Agents
/ chemistry
Porphyrins
/ chemistry
Protein Binding
Protoporphyrins
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Repressor Proteins
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Signal Transduction
REV-ERBβ
breast cancer
molecular dynamics (MD) simulation
nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR)
porphyrin
Journal
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1420-3049
Titre abrégé: Molecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100964009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 May 2021
28 May 2021
Historique:
received:
06
04
2021
revised:
15
05
2021
accepted:
26
05
2021
entrez:
2
6
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
23
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nuclear receptor REV-ERBβ is an overexpressed oncoprotein that has been used as a target for cancer treatment. The metal-complex nature of its ligand, iron protoporphyrin IX (Heme), enables the REV-ERBβ to be used for multiple therapeutic modalities as a photonuclease, a photosensitizer, or a fluorescence imaging agent. The replacement of iron with cobalt as the metal center of protoporphyrin IX changes the ligand from an agonist to an antagonist of REV-ERBβ. The mechanism behind that phenomenon is still unclear, despite the availability of crystal structures of REV-ERBβ in complex with Heme and cobalt protoporphyrin IX (CoPP). This study used molecular dynamic simulations to compare the effects of REV-ERBβ binding to Heme and CoPP, respectively. The initial poses of Heme and CoPP in complex with agonist and antagonist forms of REV-ERBβ were predicted using molecular docking. The binding energies of each ligand were calculated using the MM/PBSA method. The computed binding affinity of Heme to REV-ERBβ was stronger than that of CoPP, in agreement with experimental results. CoPP altered the conformation of the ligand-binding site of REV-ERBβ, disrupting the binding site for nuclear receptor corepressor, which is required for REV-ERBβ to regulate the transcription of downstream target genes. Those results suggest that a subtle change in the metal center of porphyrin can change the behavior of porphyrin in cancer cell signaling. Therefore, modification of porphyrin-based agents for cancer therapy should be conducted carefully to avoid triggering unfavorable effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34071361
pii: molecules26113251
doi: 10.3390/molecules26113251
pmc: PMC8198987
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ligands
0
Metals
0
NR1D2 protein, human
0
Peptides
0
Photosensitizing Agents
0
Porphyrins
0
Protoporphyrins
0
Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear
0
Repressor Proteins
0
Cobalt
3G0H8C9362
Heme
42VZT0U6YR
cobaltiprotoporphyrin
63AAN3JDZE
Iron
E1UOL152H7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Bandung Institute of Technology
ID : P3MI-ITB/2019
Organisme : Bandung Institute of Technology
ID : 7526/I1.B04/PL/2018
Références
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jan 05;4(1):e001138
pubmed: 25559010
Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 1;29(7):845-54
pubmed: 23407358
Biochemistry. 2017 Mar 7;56(9):1311-1323
pubmed: 28060481
J Comput Chem. 2014 Nov 5;35(29):2132-9
pubmed: 25220475
Biochem Pharmacol. 2015 Aug 15;96(4):315-22
pubmed: 26074263
Biophys Rev. 2017 Apr;9(2):149-168
pubmed: 28510089
Chem Soc Rev. 2019 Dec 9;48(24):5624-5657
pubmed: 31748766
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 May 22;10(5):e1003638
pubmed: 24854339
J Comput Chem. 2017 May 15;38(13):941-948
pubmed: 28211071
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Dec 27;13(12):e1005905
pubmed: 29281622
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jan 28;19(2):
pubmed: 29382080
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jan 26;17(2):
pubmed: 26821017
FEBS Lett. 2000 Apr 28;472(2-3):221-4
pubmed: 10788615
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Jul 06;13:158
pubmed: 22768846
J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1701-18
pubmed: 16211538
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 11;8(46):81591-81603
pubmed: 29113417
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010 Jul;17(7):808-14
pubmed: 20581824
Pharmaceutics. 2019 Feb 15;11(2):
pubmed: 30769938
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Sep 12;13(9):4584-4592
pubmed: 28800393
Biosensors (Basel). 2018 Oct 19;8(4):
pubmed: 30347683
Theranostics. 2011;1:363-70
pubmed: 21938264
Molecules. 2016 Mar 31;21(4):439
pubmed: 27043519
Hypertension. 2009 Mar;53(3):508-15
pubmed: 19171794
J Chem Inf Model. 2020 Mar 23;60(3):1528-1539
pubmed: 31910338
Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Oct;7(10):3187-94
pubmed: 18852122
J Comput Chem. 2009 Dec;30(16):2785-91
pubmed: 19399780
J Biol Chem. 2013 May 10;288(19):13718-27
pubmed: 23530045
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014 Mar;13(3):197-216
pubmed: 24577401
Molecules. 2019 Jul 23;24(14):
pubmed: 31340553
J Biol Chem. 2014 Jul 18;289(29):20054-66
pubmed: 24872411
PLoS Biol. 2009 Feb 24;7(2):e43
pubmed: 19243223
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jul 23;5:367
pubmed: 22824207
ACS Chem Biol. 2011 Feb 18;6(2):131-4
pubmed: 21043485
Mol Endocrinol. 2008 Jul;22(7):1509-20
pubmed: 18218725
J Chem Theory Comput. 2016 Nov 8;12(11):5596-5608
pubmed: 27760290
Biochem Pharmacol. 2016 Mar 15;104:42-51
pubmed: 26807479
J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Oct 24;56(10):2035-2041
pubmed: 27681090
Curr Drug Metab. 2002 Dec;3(6):561-97
pubmed: 12369887
Protein Sci. 2006 Apr;15(4):722-30
pubmed: 16600964
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2014 Oct 02;2(3):169-87
pubmed: 25374920
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 14;9(1):4585
pubmed: 30872796
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Jul 28;54(7):1951-62
pubmed: 24850022
J Res Med Sci. 2014 Feb;19(2):164-74
pubmed: 24778671
J Mol Model. 2017 Dec 6;24(1):5
pubmed: 29214361
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 May 24;53(5):1229-34
pubmed: 23611462
J Chem Phys. 2013 Jul 21;139(3):034104
pubmed: 23883007
Protein Sci. 2015 Jul;24(7):1129-46
pubmed: 25969949
Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2008 Sep 19;1:17-32
pubmed: 24198458
Drug Metab Rev. 2011 Feb;43(1):1-26
pubmed: 20860521
Environ Health Perspect. 1992 Nov;98:81-5
pubmed: 1486867
Hepatology. 2014 Jun;59(6):2383-96
pubmed: 24497272