'I Was Smoking a Lot More during Lockdown Because I Can': A Qualitative Study of How UK Smokers Responded to the Covid-19 Lockdown.


Journal

International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 05 2021
Historique:
received: 19 04 2021
revised: 13 05 2021
accepted: 25 05 2021
entrez: 2 6 2021
pubmed: 3 6 2021
medline: 8 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study explored how Covid-19 lockdown restrictions affected people's daily smoking routines and behaviours, including adherence and modifications to pre-established smoking restrictions in the home. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with smokers and non-smokers from smoking households 19 to 27 weeks after the first full UK lockdown ended in May 2020. A non-probability purposive sample representing 25 adults aged 21 or over living in households with at least 1 smoker were recruited to the study. A quota sampling strategy was used, according to age, gender, smoking status, family status, household composition, householder access to outdoor space, and change to work-life status. Most participants found lockdown increased the amount of time spent at home, where stresses associated with confinement, curtailment of social routines, removal of barriers and distractions to smoking due to home working, and feelings of boredom all contributed to increased smoking. Fewer factors were identified as reducing smoking during lockdown. Prominent examples included disruption to habitual smoking patterns and distraction from smoking associated with spending more time doing outdoor activities. Pressures placed on physical space and lack of privacy due to the confinement at home were responsible for displacement of smoking within the home, leading to breaking of smoke-free rules and family tensions, and in some cases to greater awareness amongst parents that their children smoked. Changes in daily routines associated with lockdown affected and displaced smoking behaviour both positively and negatively. Health improvement interventions could seek to harness positive changes in smoking associated with any future lockdown approaches. New home-working norms highlight the need for employers to support staff to reduce their smoking and to remain smoke-free.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34071475
pii: ijerph18115816
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115816
pmc: PMC8198893
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Tobacco Smoke Pollution 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : National Institute for Health Research Policy Research Programme
ID : PH-PRU Project 08 (PHSEZQ47-22-C)

Références

BMJ. 2020 Nov 2;371:m4074
pubmed: 33139247
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Sep;5(9):e493-e500
pubmed: 32888442
Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 Oct 23;6:59
pubmed: 33163705
Health Psychol Res. 2020 May 27;8(1):9124
pubmed: 32529094
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 May 4;23(5):866-871
pubmed: 33515223
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Apr 1;221:108590
pubmed: 33631546
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jun;16(3):207-14
pubmed: 18540780
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Mar 3;:
pubmed: 33657644
Tob Induc Dis. 2020 Jul 27;18:63
pubmed: 32733178
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Aug;11(8):924-32
pubmed: 19541947
J Health Psychol. 2020 Aug;25(9):1155-1163
pubmed: 32551944
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Sep 1;111(1-2):58-63
pubmed: 20510552
Tob Control. 2021 Mar 29;:
pubmed: 33782199
Tob Induc Dis. 2020 Jul 03;18:58
pubmed: 32641924
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 08;15:869
pubmed: 26350614
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(9):1662-1663
pubmed: 32343816
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 30;9:CD013183
pubmed: 31565800
Psychol Health. 2020 Dec 18;:1-17
pubmed: 33336583
Adv Life Course Res. 2019 Dec;42:
pubmed: 31903090
Health Commun. 2018 Sep;33(9):1068-1077
pubmed: 28622007
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 17;18(4):
pubmed: 33671203
Health Educ Res. 2018 Jun 1;33(3):256-259
pubmed: 29788227
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 17;6(3):e010260
pubmed: 26988351
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(4):437-441
pubmed: 33435783
Addiction. 2021 May;116(5):1233-1244
pubmed: 33089562
Tob Induc Dis. 2020 Mar 20;18:20
pubmed: 32206052

Auteurs

Rachel O'Donnell (R)

Institute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.

Douglas Eadie (D)

Institute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.

Martine Stead (M)

Institute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.

Ruaraidh Dobson (R)

Institute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.

Sean Semple (S)

Institute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH