Consumer Perspectives on Processing Technologies for Organic Food.

consumer behaviour consumer preference focus groups food preservation organic food organic processing processing technologies shelf life

Journal

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 May 2021
Historique:
received: 14 04 2021
revised: 20 05 2021
accepted: 21 05 2021
entrez: 2 6 2021
pubmed: 3 6 2021
medline: 3 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Over the last years, consumer demand for natural and healthy convenient food has increased, and with it the demand for organic convenience food. With convenience food, the processing level increases, which consumers are sceptical of. This holds especially for organic consumers who prefer natural, healthy, and sustainable food products. In the literature, consumer preferences are investigated for processed conventional food, but rarely for organic products. Therefore, this study investigates consumers' knowledge, expectations, and attitudes towards selected processing technologies for organic food. Nine focus groups with 84 organic consumers were conducted, discussing preservation technologies of organic milk and orange juice. Results showed that participants had little knowledge about processing technologies but were interested in their benefits. Organic processing technologies should include fewer processing steps, low environmental impact, while keeping the product as natural as possible. Since consumers want to know benefits but not details of processing, asking consumers for their specific preferences when developing new processing technologies remains challenging. This paper shows how consumers' benefit and risk perception including their want for naturalness, and scepticism for new technologies shape their evaluation of (organic) food processing technologies. Two consumer groups with different attitudes towards processing could be identified: 'organic traditionalists' and 'organic pragmatics'.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34072073
pii: foods10061212
doi: 10.3390/foods10061212
pmc: PMC8229621
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung
ID : 2817OE015

Références

Appetite. 2014 Feb;73:140-6
pubmed: 24231427
Foods. 2020 Nov 25;9(12):
pubmed: 33255640
Appetite. 2016 Mar 1;98:1-11
pubmed: 26678163
Appetite. 2009 Feb;52(1):115-26
pubmed: 18845196
Front Nutr. 2019 Jun 25;6:85
pubmed: 31294027
Foods. 2020 Feb 29;9(3):
pubmed: 32121318
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2018 Jan;17(1):2-62
pubmed: 33350062
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Oct;94(13):2582-94
pubmed: 24375441
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016 Sep;15(5):844-867
pubmed: 33401803
J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:280-283
pubmed: 32536735
Appetite. 2012 Oct;59(2):448-55
pubmed: 22698976
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 16;12:595636
pubmed: 33679515
Food Res Int. 2019 Jun;120:763-775
pubmed: 31000296
Food Res Int. 2019 Nov;125:108555
pubmed: 31554093
Meat Sci. 2016 Oct;120:2-9
pubmed: 27162095
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61(1):97-115
pubmed: 32003225

Auteurs

Ronja Hüppe (R)

Section of Agricultural and Food Marketing, University of Kassel, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany.

Katrin Zander (K)

Section of Agricultural and Food Marketing, University of Kassel, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH