Vaccine Production Process: How Much Does the General Population Know about This Topic? A Web-Based Survey.

hesitancy immunization knowledge online survey pharmaceutical industry quality control safety vaccine manufacturing

Journal

Vaccines
ISSN: 2076-393X
Titre abrégé: Vaccines (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101629355

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 May 2021
Historique:
received: 30 03 2021
revised: 20 05 2021
accepted: 27 05 2021
entrez: 2 6 2021
pubmed: 3 6 2021
medline: 3 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Vaccine hesitancy has been recognized as a major global health threat by the World Health Organization. Many studies have investigated vaccine safety as a determinant for vaccine hesitancy; however, not much attention has been paid to vaccine production and quality control during the vaccine production process or whether knowledge about this topic may influence vaccine confidence. The aim of this study was to characterize the common knowledge about the vaccine production process. A freely accessible online questionnaire was developed on Google Modules and disseminated through social networks. A descriptive analysis of the collected answers was performed, and the chi-square test was used to assess significant differences for the sociodemographic characteristics of the study population (age, gender, work or education and training in the healthcare setting, minor offspring). A binary logistic regression model was performed considering these socio-demographic categories as independent variables. The number of collected questionnaire was 135. Most of the participants (127/135, 94.1%) were aware that quality control measures are carried out during manufacturing, although some knowledge gaps emerged in specific aspects of the vaccine production process, without statistically significant differences between age groups. Working in the healthcare setting or being educated in healthcare may be considered predictors for a better understanding that more than 50% of the production time is spent on quality control (AOR = 3.43; 95% CI: 1.84-8.14, This study allowed for a characterization of common knowledge about the vaccine production process. It highlighted the need to implement specific strategies to spread correct information about the vaccine production process. This study may contribute to increased confidence and trust in vaccines and vaccination among the general population.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Vaccine hesitancy has been recognized as a major global health threat by the World Health Organization. Many studies have investigated vaccine safety as a determinant for vaccine hesitancy; however, not much attention has been paid to vaccine production and quality control during the vaccine production process or whether knowledge about this topic may influence vaccine confidence. The aim of this study was to characterize the common knowledge about the vaccine production process.
METHODS METHODS
A freely accessible online questionnaire was developed on Google Modules and disseminated through social networks. A descriptive analysis of the collected answers was performed, and the chi-square test was used to assess significant differences for the sociodemographic characteristics of the study population (age, gender, work or education and training in the healthcare setting, minor offspring). A binary logistic regression model was performed considering these socio-demographic categories as independent variables.
RESULTS RESULTS
The number of collected questionnaire was 135. Most of the participants (127/135, 94.1%) were aware that quality control measures are carried out during manufacturing, although some knowledge gaps emerged in specific aspects of the vaccine production process, without statistically significant differences between age groups. Working in the healthcare setting or being educated in healthcare may be considered predictors for a better understanding that more than 50% of the production time is spent on quality control (AOR = 3.43; 95% CI: 1.84-8.14,
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study allowed for a characterization of common knowledge about the vaccine production process. It highlighted the need to implement specific strategies to spread correct information about the vaccine production process. This study may contribute to increased confidence and trust in vaccines and vaccination among the general population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34072288
pii: vaccines9060564
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060564
pmc: PMC8229207
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : GSK S.p.A
ID : 3001980298/2019

Références

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(4):918-931
pubmed: 30633626
Vaccine. 2018 Aug 28;36(36):5424-5429
pubmed: 28610824
Perspect Clin Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):148-151
pubmed: 28828311
Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1630-5
pubmed: 1746660
J Infect Public Health. 2021 May;14(5):661-667
pubmed: 33857726
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007 Jun;20(3):237-46
pubmed: 17471032
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Vaccine. 1992;10 Suppl 1:S99-101
pubmed: 1335671
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Mar 24;12:600273
pubmed: 33867977
Vaccine. 2016 Dec 20;34(52):6665-6671
pubmed: 27884478
Am J Transplant. 2010 Jul;10(7):1686-94
pubmed: 20642690
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Aug;9(8):1763-73
pubmed: 23584253
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Feb 1;17(2):443-450
pubmed: 32692948
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 May;23(5):279-280
pubmed: 27851999
Vaccine. 2019 Oct 23;37(45):6793-6802
pubmed: 31562000
EBioMedicine. 2015 Jul 02;2(8):792-3
pubmed: 26425679
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009 Feb;8(2):227-38
pubmed: 19196202
Vaccine. 2016 Sep 22;34(41):5013-5020
pubmed: 27576074
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(21):e6972
pubmed: 28538397
Vaccine. 2020 Nov 3;38(47):7464-7471
pubmed: 33041097
Vaccine. 2016 Dec 20;34(52):6700-6706
pubmed: 27810314
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 16;9(2):
pubmed: 33669441
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 23;9(1):
pubmed: 33374510
Lancet. 2011 Aug 6;378(9790):526-35
pubmed: 21664679
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 16;13:1183
pubmed: 24341406
Hosp Top. 2018 Jan-Mar;96(1):18-27
pubmed: 28915100
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 18;18(6):
pubmed: 33803553
Vaccine. 2010 Aug 9;28(35):5731-7
pubmed: 20558250
Public Health. 2020 Mar;180:38-45
pubmed: 31838344
Front Microbiol. 2020 Mar 17;11:372
pubmed: 32256465
Vaccine. 2021 Feb 12;39(7):1148-1156
pubmed: 33461834
Vaccine. 2010 Oct 18;28(44):7207-14
pubmed: 20804802
Mater Sociomed. 2020 Dec;32(4):307-314
pubmed: 33628135

Auteurs

Angela Bechini (A)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Paolo Bonanni (P)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Beatrice Zanella (B)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Giulia Di Pisa (G)

Medical Specialization School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Andrea Moscadelli (A)

Medical Specialization School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Sonia Paoli (S)

Medical Specialization School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Leonardo Ancillotti (L)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Benedetta Bonito (B)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Sara Boccalini (S)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Classifications MeSH