Why a New Research Agenda on Green Spaces and Health Is Needed in Latin America: Results of a Systematic Review.
Latin-America
epidemiology
green spaces
health
systematic review
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 05 2021
29 05 2021
Historique:
received:
13
05
2021
revised:
26
05
2021
accepted:
26
05
2021
entrez:
2
6
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
2
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Background: Increasing and improving green spaces have been suggested to enhance health and well-being through different mechanisms. Latin America is experiencing fast population and urbanization growth; with rising demand for interventions to improve public health and mitigate climate change. (2) Aim: This study aimed to review the epidemiological evidence on green spaces and health outcomes in Latin America. (3) Methods: A systematic literature review of green spaces and health outcomes was carried out for studies published in Latin America before 28 September 2020. A search strategy was designed to identify studies published in Medline via PubMed and LILACS. The search strategy included terms related to green spaces combined with keywords related to health and geographical location. No time limit for the publication was chosen. The search was limited to English, Spanish, Portuguese, and French published articles and humans' studies. (4) Findings: This systematic review found 19 epidemiological studies in Latin America related to green spaces and health outcomes. Nine studies were conducted in Brazil, six in Mexico, three in Colombia, and one in Chile. In terms of study design, 14 were cross-sectional studies, 3 ecological, and 2 cohort studies. The population included among the studies ranged from 120 persons to 103 million. The green space definition used among studies was green density or proximity (eight studies), green presence (five studies), green spaces index (four studies), and green space visit (two studies). The health outcomes included were mental health (six studies), overweight and obesity (three studies), quality of life (three studies), mortality (two studies), cardiorespiratory disease (one study), disability (one study), falls (one study), and life expectancy (one study). Eleven studies found a positive association between green spaces and health, and eight studies found no association. (5) Conclusion: This systematic review identified 19 epidemiological studies associating green spaces and health outcomes in Latin America. Most of the evidence suggests a positive association between green spaces and health in the region. However, most of the evidence was supported by cross-sectional studies. Prioritizing longitudinal studies with harmonized exposure and outcome definitions and including vulnerable and susceptible populations is needed in the region.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34072319
pii: ijerph18115839
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115839
pmc: PMC8198896
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jan 21;48(2):1247-55
pubmed: 24320055
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):139-45
pubmed: 23332329
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;64(7):637-646
pubmed: 30112960
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Jan - Feb;68:119-125
pubmed: 27788377
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 21;13:988
pubmed: 24143958
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 22;12(4):4354-79
pubmed: 25913182
Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Oct;29(10):1988-96
pubmed: 24127093
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219540
pubmed: 31291353
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018 Mar;5(1):77-87
pubmed: 29392643
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 19;14(10):
pubmed: 29048373
J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jul;7 Suppl 2:S181-95
pubmed: 20702906
Environ Int. 2017 Jun;103:61-72
pubmed: 28389127
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 30;115:87-97
pubmed: 23246769
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 03;15(3):
pubmed: 29510520
Environ Int. 2016 Jan;86:60-7
pubmed: 26540085
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1151-1210
pubmed: 28919116
Biomedica. 2015 Aug;35 Spec:46-57
pubmed: 26535741
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016 Sep;40(3):150-159
pubmed: 27991972
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 May;190:394-401
pubmed: 17470953
Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Jun;27(6):1175-84
pubmed: 21710014
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Nov;3(11):e469-e477
pubmed: 31777338
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015 Jun;2(2):131-142
pubmed: 26185745
Lancet. 2019 Nov 16;394(10211):1836-1878
pubmed: 31733928
Environ Health. 2016 Mar 08;15 Suppl 1:38
pubmed: 26960529
Health Place. 2013 Jan;19:167-73
pubmed: 23262454
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(7):1070-6
pubmed: 20138418
Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 27;5:30082
pubmed: 26615823
Salud Publica Mex. 2012 Jul-Aug;54(4):367-74
pubmed: 22832828
Sao Paulo Med J. 2018 May-Jun;136(3):228-236
pubmed: 29924287
Environ Res. 2016 Nov;151:203-215
pubmed: 27497083
Cad Saude Publica. 2018 May 10;34(5):e00060217
pubmed: 29768581
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Jan;3(1):e17-e25
pubmed: 30654864
Rev Saude Publica. 2019 Sep 23;53:75
pubmed: 31553378
Prev Med. 2018 Oct;115:119-125
pubmed: 30149036