Shape Analysis as an Additional Tool in Roe Deer (

geometric morphometry mandible roe deer shape analysis trophic resources wildlife management

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 May 2021
Historique:
received: 26 04 2021
revised: 22 05 2021
accepted: 25 05 2021
entrez: 2 6 2021
pubmed: 3 6 2021
medline: 3 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The analysis of body shape variability has always been a central element in biology. More recently, geometric morphometry has developed as a new field in shape analysis, with the aim to study body morphological variations and the identification of their causes. In wildlife management, geometric morphometry could be a useful tool to compare the anatomical structures of an organism and quantify its geometric information in order to relate them to environmental factors, thus identifying the causes and effects of the variation and acting management and/or conservation plans. The aim of our study is to evaluate the relationship between roe deer mandible shape and trophic resources available during autumn and winter. We applied a geometric morphometry approach consisting of a Relative Warp analysis of landmark data in 26 roe deer fawn mandibles. Each sample was assigned to an age category and to an environmental category based on the territory carrying capacity. The mandible shape of samples under 8 months of age is likely influenced by the availability of trophic resources. Our findings suggest that the mandible shape is a reliable instrument to assess resource availability. Geometric morphometry could thus represent an additional tool for roe deer management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34072485
pii: ani11061611
doi: 10.3390/ani11061611
pmc: PMC8228368
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

PLoS One. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0211852
pubmed: 30721258
Evol Anthropol. 2012 Jul-Aug;21(4):151-65
pubmed: 22907868
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2005 May;64(2):97-100
pubmed: 16121327
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 11;10(3):
pubmed: 32168772
Behav Processes. 2017 Jul;140:115-120
pubmed: 28442429
J Anat. 2011 Jan;218(1):3-15
pubmed: 20880075
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 7;269(1492):747-53
pubmed: 11934368
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 11;14(9):e0222150
pubmed: 31509573
Oecologia. 1989 Mar;78(4):443-457
pubmed: 28312172
Evolution. 2010 May;64(5):1489-503
pubmed: 20015238
Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Apr;8(4):129-32
pubmed: 21236128
Syst Biol. 2013 Jul;62(4):591-610
pubmed: 23589497

Auteurs

Cesare Pacioni (C)

Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Francesca Mercati (F)

Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.

Andrea Catorci (A)

School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Andrea Brusaferro (A)

FaunLab, Via Ottaviani 46, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Diederik Strubbe (D)

Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Paola Scocco (P)

School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Classifications MeSH