Residual Birch Wood Lignocellulose after 2-Furaldehyde Production as a Potential Feedstock for Obtaining Fiber.

2-furaldehyde birch wood lignocellulose monosaccharides pre-treatment

Journal

Polymers
ISSN: 2073-4360
Titre abrégé: Polymers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 May 2021
Historique:
received: 21 04 2021
revised: 25 05 2021
accepted: 25 05 2021
entrez: 2 6 2021
pubmed: 3 6 2021
medline: 3 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

From birch wood, it is possible to obtain both acetic acid and 2-furaldehyde as valuable value-added products. The main objective of this study was to develop a new wasteless technology for obtaining 2-furaldehyde, acetic acid, and lignocellulose (LC) residue usable as feedstock in further processing such as thermomechanical (TMP), alkaline peroxide mechanical (APMP), and sulfate pulping processes. To achieve this objective several screening tests were performed, and a further experimental plan was developed using DesignExpert11. Process yields were analyzed both in terms of total yield and at individual time increments. In addition, the obtained LC residue was also characterized. A unique bench-scale reactor system was used to obtain an LC material without pentoses and with maximum preservation of cellulose fiber for further research. Studies on the deacetylation and dehydration of birch wood hemicelluloses of pentose monosaccharides to 2-furaldehyde and acetic acid using orthophosphoric acid as a catalyst were carried out. Results showed that, depending on the used pre-treatment conditions, the 2-furaldehyde yield was from 0.04% to 10.84% oven dry mass (o.d.m.), the acetic acid yield was from 0.51% to 6.50% o.d.m., and the LC residue yield was from 68.13% to 98.07% o.d.m. with minimal content of admixtures. Process optimization using DesignExpert11 revealed that the main pre-treatment process parameters that influenced the yield of 2-furaldehyde in the pre-treatment process were process temperature (53.3%) and process duration (29.8%).

Identifiants

pubmed: 34072843
pii: polym13111816
doi: 10.3390/polym13111816
pmc: PMC8199151
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : European Regional Development Fund
ID : 1.1.1.2/VIAA/2/19/392

Références

ISRN Biotechnol. 2014 May 04;2014:463074
pubmed: 25937989
Carbohydr Res. 2012 Aug 1;357:53-61
pubmed: 22703600
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:298153
pubmed: 25614881
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2013 Dec 02;372(2006):20130179
pubmed: 24298085
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009 Jun;20(3):372-80
pubmed: 19502048
Carbohydr Res. 2006 Dec 29;341(18):2946-53
pubmed: 17081510
New Phytol. 2008;178(3):473-85
pubmed: 18373653

Auteurs

Maris Puke (M)

Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, Dzerbenes 27, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.

Daniela Godina (D)

Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, Dzerbenes 27, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.
Department of Chemistry, University of Latvia, Jelgavas 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.

Mikelis Kirpluks (M)

Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, Dzerbenes 27, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.

Janis Rizikovs (J)

Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, Dzerbenes 27, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.

Prans Brazdausks (P)

Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, Dzerbenes 27, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.

Classifications MeSH