Effect of Oats and Wheat Genotype on In Vitro Gas Production Kinetics of Straw.
gas production
genotypes
in vitro
oats
ruminants
straw
wheat
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 May 2021
26 May 2021
Historique:
received:
14
03
2021
revised:
07
05
2021
accepted:
17
05
2021
entrez:
2
6
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
3
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Increases in cereals grain yield in the last decades have increased the accumulation of straw on the soil after harvest. Farmers typically open burn the straw to prepare the soil for the next crop, resulting in pollution, emission of greenhouse gases, erosion, loss of soil organic matter, and wildfires. An alternative is feeding straw to ruminants, but straw nutritive value is limited by its high content of lignocellulose and low content of protein. Cereal breeding programs have focused on improving grain yield and quality and agronomic traits, but little attention has been paid to straw nutritive value. We screened straw from 49 genotypes of oats and 24 genotypes of wheat from three cereal breeding trials conducted in Chile for in vitro gas production kinetics. We found moderate effects of the genotype on gas production at 8, 24, and 40 h of incubation, and on the maximum extent and rate of gas production. Gas production was negatively associated with lignin and cellulose contents and not negatively associated with grain yield and resistance to diseases and lodging. Effects observed in vitro need to be confirmed in animal experiments before gas production kinetics can be adopted to identify cereal genotypes with more digestible straw.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34073369
pii: ani11061552
doi: 10.3390/ani11061552
pmc: PMC8228468
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA
ID : 502779-70
Références
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Nov 14;2013:436517
pubmed: 24348159
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003 Dec;27(5):663-93
pubmed: 14638418
Br J Nutr. 1997 May;77(5):757-68
pubmed: 9175995
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2019 Jul 1;43(4):362-379
pubmed: 31050730
J Dairy Sci. 1996 Aug;79(8):1496-502
pubmed: 8880475
J Sci Food Agric. 2012 Mar 30;92(5):1010-5
pubmed: 21769884
Plant Sci. 2012 Apr;185-186:65-77
pubmed: 22325867
J Nutr. 1997 May;127(5 Suppl):810S-813S
pubmed: 9164242
Br J Nutr. 1970 Dec;24(4):1013-28
pubmed: 5484722
Field Crops Res. 2019 Nov 1;243:107627
pubmed: 31853164
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Nov;24(31):24297-24310
pubmed: 28889344
Animal. 2018 Dec;12(s2):s199-s209
pubmed: 30139396
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3583-97
pubmed: 1660498
Front Microbiol. 2015 Feb 04;6:37
pubmed: 25699029
J Dairy Sci. 1993 Apr;76(4):1063-73
pubmed: 8486838
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(21):25956-25969
pubmed: 32378100