Modeling transcriptomic age using knowledge-primed artificial neural networks.
Journal
NPJ aging and mechanisms of disease
ISSN: 2056-3973
Titre abrégé: NPJ Aging Mech Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101678947
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2021
01 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
12
08
2020
accepted:
26
04
2021
entrez:
2
6
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
3
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The development of 'age clocks', machine learning models predicting age from biological data, has been a major milestone in the search for reliable markers of biological age and has since become an invaluable tool in aging research. However, beyond their unquestionable utility, current clocks offer little insight into the molecular biological processes driving aging, and their inner workings often remain non-transparent. Here we propose a new type of age clock, one that couples predictivity with interpretability of the underlying biology, achieved through the incorporation of prior knowledge into the model design. The clock, an artificial neural network constructed according to well-described biological pathways, allows the prediction of age from gene expression data of skin tissue with high accuracy, while at the same time capturing and revealing aging states of the pathways driving the prediction. The model recapitulates known associations of aging gene knockdowns in simulation experiments and demonstrates its utility in deciphering the main pathways by which accelerated aging conditions such as Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome, as well as pro-longevity interventions like caloric restriction, exert their effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34075044
doi: 10.1038/s41514-021-00068-5
pii: 10.1038/s41514-021-00068-5
pmc: PMC8169742
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
15Références
Bocklandt, S. et al. Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS ONE 6, e14821 (2011).
pubmed: 21731603
pmcid: 3120753
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014821
Hannum, G. et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol. Cell 49, 359–367 (2013).
pubmed: 23177740
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016
Horvath, S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 14, R115 (2013).
pubmed: 24138928
pmcid: 4015143
doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
Holly, A. C. et al. Towards a gene expression biomarker set for human biological age. Aging Cell 12, 324–326 (2013).
pubmed: 23311345
doi: 10.1111/acel.12044
Peters, M. J. et al. The transcriptional landscape of age in human peripheral blood. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–14 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms9570
Hertel, J. et al. Measuring biological age via metabonomics: the metabolic age score. J. Proteome Res. 15, 400–410 (2016).
pubmed: 26652958
doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00561
Mamoshina, P. et al. Machine learning on human muscle transcriptomic data for biomarker discovery and tissue-specific drug target identification. Front. Genet. 9, 242 (2018).
pubmed: 30050560
pmcid: 6052089
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00242
Fleischer, J. G. et al. Predicting age from the transcriptome of human dermal fibroblasts. Genome Biol. 19, 221 (2018).
pubmed: 30567591
pmcid: 6300908
doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1599-6
Tanaka, T. et al. Plasma proteomic signature of age in healthy humans. Aging Cell 17, 5 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/acel.12799
Ma, J. et al. Using deep learning to model the hierarchical structure and function of a cell. Nat. Methods 15, 290–298 (2018).
pubmed: 29505029
pmcid: 5882547
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4627
Scharffetter-Kochanek, K. et al. Photoaging of the skin from phenotype to mechanisms. Exp. Gerontol. 35, 307–316 (2000).
pubmed: 10832052
doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(00)00098-X
Völzke, H. et al. Cohort profile: the study of health in Pomerania. Int. J. Epidemiol. 40, 294–307 (2011).
pubmed: 20167617
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp394
Liberzon, A. et al. The molecular signatures database hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425 (2015).
pubmed: 26771021
pmcid: 4707969
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004
Hansen, L. K. & Salamon, P. Neural network ensembles. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12, 993–1001 (1990).
doi: 10.1109/34.58871
Bormann, F. et al. Reduced DNA methylation patterning and transcriptional connectivity define human skin aging. Aging Cell 15, 563–71 (2016).
pubmed: 27004597
pmcid: 4854925
doi: 10.1111/acel.12470
Holzscheck, N. et al. Multi-omics network analysis reveals distinct stages in the human aging progression in epidermal tissue. Aging 12, 12393–12409 (2020).
pubmed: 32554863
pmcid: 7343460
doi: 10.18632/aging.103499
Galkin, F. et al. Biohorology and biomarkers of aging: current state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Ageing Res. Rev. 60, 101050 (2020).
pubmed: 32272169
doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101050
Gladyshev, V. N. Aging: progressive decline in fitness due to the rising deleteriome adjusted by genetic, environmental, and stochastic processes. Aging Cell 15, 594–602 (2016).
pubmed: 27060562
pmcid: 4933668
doi: 10.1111/acel.12480
Harman, D. Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J. Gerontol. 11, 298–300 (1956).
pubmed: 13332224
doi: 10.1093/geronj/11.3.298
Williams, G. C. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11, 398–411 (1957).
doi: 10.2307/2406060
Boily, G. et al. SirT1 regulates energy metabolism and response to caloric restriction in mice. PLoS ONE 3, e1759 (2008).
pubmed: 18335035
pmcid: 2258149
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001759
Herranz, D. et al. Sirt1 improves healthy ageing and protects from metabolic syndrome-associated cancer. Nat. Commun. 1, 3 (2010).
pubmed: 20975665
doi: 10.1038/ncomms1001
Satoh, A. et al. Sirt1 extends life span and delays aging in mice through the regulation of Nk2 homeobox 1 in the DMH and LH. Cell Metab. 18, 416–430 (2013).
pubmed: 24011076
pmcid: 3794712
doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.07.013
Kim, D. H., Jung, I. H., Kim, D. H. & Park, S. W. Knockout of longevity gene Sirt1 in zebrafish leads to oxidative injury, chronic inflammation, and reduced life span. PLOS ONE 14, e0220581 (2019).
pubmed: 31386694
pmcid: 6684063
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220581
Huy, H. et al. TXNIP regulates AKT-mediated cellular senescence by direct interaction under glucose-mediated metabolic stress. Aging Cell 17, 6 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/acel.12836
Oberacker, T. et al. Enhanced expression of thioredoxin‐interacting‐protein regulates oxidative DNA damage and aging. FEBS Lett. 592, 2297–2307 (2018).
pubmed: 29897613
pmcid: 6099297
doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13156
Khan, S. S. et al. A null mutation in SERPINE1 protects against biological aging in humans. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao1617 (2017).
pubmed: 29152572
pmcid: 5687852
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao1617
Wong, C.-W. et al. Krüppel-like transcription factor 4 contributes to maintenance of telomerase activity in stem cells. Stem Cells 28, 1510–1517 (2010).
pubmed: 20629177
doi: 10.1002/stem.477
Panatta, E. et al. Kruppel-like factor 4 regulates keratinocyte senescence. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 499, 389–395 (2018).
pubmed: 29580988
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.03.172
Kuehne, A. et al. An integrative metabolomics and transcriptomics study to identify metabolic alterations in aged skin of humans in vivo. BMC Genomics 18, 169 (2017).
pubmed: 28201987
pmcid: 5312537
doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3547-3
Hennekam, R. C. M. Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome: review of the phenotype. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 140, 2603–2624 (2006).
pubmed: 16838330
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31346
Gordon, L. B. et al. Impact of farnesylation inhibitors on survival in Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome. Circulation 130, 27–34 (2014).
pubmed: 24795390
pmcid: 4082404
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008285
Csoka, A. B. et al. Genome-scale expression profiling of Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome reveals widespread transcriptional misregulation leading to mesodermal/mesenchymal defects and accelerated atherosclerosis. Aging Cell 3, 235–243 (2004).
pubmed: 15268757
doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00105.x
Yan, W. et al. Transcriptome analysis of skin photoaging in Chinese females reveals the involvement of skin homeostasis and metabolic changes. PLOS ONE 8, e61946 (2013).
pubmed: 23637934
pmcid: 3634825
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061946
Röwert-Huber, J. et al. Actinic keratosis is an early in situ squamous cell carcinoma: a proposal for reclassification. Br. J. Dermatol. 156, 8–12 (2007).
pubmed: 17488400
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07860.x
Glogau, R. G. The risk of progression to invasive disease. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 42, 23–24 (2000).
pubmed: 10607353
doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.103339
Lambert, S. R. et al. Key differences identified between actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by transcriptome profiling. Br. J. Cancer 110, 520–529 (2014).
pubmed: 24335922
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.760
Armstrong, B. K. & Kricker, A. The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 63, 8–18 (2001).
pubmed: 11684447
doi: 10.1016/S1011-1344(01)00198-1
Hoang, V. L. T. et al. RNA-seq reveals more consistent reference genes for gene expression studies in human non-melanoma skin cancers. PeerJ 5, e3631 (2017).
pubmed: 28852586
pmcid: 5572537
doi: 10.7717/peerj.3631
Aunan, J. R., Cho, W. C. & Søreide, K. The biology of aging and cancer: a brief overview of shared and divergent molecular hallmarks. Aging Dis. 8, 628–642 (2017).
pubmed: 28966806
pmcid: 5614326
doi: 10.14336/AD.2017.0103
National Cancer Institute (NCI). SEER Cancer Statistics Review (CSR) 1975–2014. https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2014/ (2018).
Krtolica, A., Parrinello, S., Lockett, S., Desprez, P. Y. & Campisi, J. Senescent fibroblasts promote epithelial cell growth and tumorigenesis: a link between cancer and aging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12072–12077 (2001).
pubmed: 11593017
doi: 10.1073/pnas.211053698
pmcid: 59769
Demaria, M. et al. An essential role for senescent cells in optimal wound healing through secretion of PDGF-AA. Dev. Cell 31, 722–733 (2014).
pubmed: 25499914
pmcid: 4349629
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.012
Salminen, A., Kaarniranta, K. & Kauppinen, A. Inflammaging: disturbed interplay between autophagy and inflammasomes. Aging 4, 166–175 (2012).
pubmed: 22411934
pmcid: 3348477
doi: 10.18632/aging.100444
Franceschi, C., Garagnani, P., Parini, P., Giuliani, C. & Santoro, A. Inflammaging: a new immune–metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14, 576–590 (2018).
pubmed: 30046148
doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0059-4
Sturm, G. et al. Human aging DNA methylation signatures are conserved but accelerated in cultured fibroblasts. Epigenetics 14, 961–976 (2019).
pubmed: 31156022
pmcid: 6691995
doi: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1626651
Hodges, A. & Smoller, B. R. Immunohistochemical comparison of p16 expression in actinic keratoses and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Mod. Pathol. 15, 1121–1125 (2002).
pubmed: 12429789
doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000032536.48264.D1
Toutfaire, M. et al. Unraveling the interplay between senescent dermal fibroblasts and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma cell lines at different stages of tumorigenesis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 98, 113–126 (2018).
pubmed: 29550586
doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2018.03.005
Weindruch, R. & Walford, R. L. Dietary restriction in mice beginning at 1 year of age: effect on life-span and spontaneous cancer incidence. Science 215, 1415–1418 (1982).
pubmed: 7063854
doi: 10.1126/science.7063854
Lee, C. & Longo, V. Dietary restriction with and without caloric restriction for healthy aging. F1000Res 5, 117 (2016).
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7136.1
Ma, S. et al. Caloric restriction reprograms the single-cell transcriptional landsc. Rattus Norvegicus-. Aging Cell 180, 984–1001.e22 (2020).
Chen, C.-N. J., Lin, S.-Y., Liao, Y.-H., Li, Z.-J. & Wong, A. M.-K. Late-onset caloric restriction alters skeletal muscle metabolism by modulating pyruvate metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 308, E942–949 (2015).
pubmed: 26032513
doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00508.2014
Chen, C.-N., Liao, Y.-H., Tsai, S.-C. & Thompson, L. V. Age-dependent effects of caloric restriction on mTOR and ubiquitin-proteasome pathways in skeletal muscles. GeroScience 41, 871–880 (2019).
pubmed: 31676964
pmcid: 6925080
doi: 10.1007/s11357-019-00109-8
Pifferi, F. et al. Caloric restriction increases lifespan but affects brain integrity in grey mouse lemur primates. Commun. Biol. 1, 1–8 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0024-8
Kalluri, R. & Neilson, E. G. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition and its implications for fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 112, 1776–1784 (2003).
pubmed: 14679171
doi: 10.1172/JCI200320530
pmcid: 297008
Hill, C., Jones, M. G., Davies, D. E. & Wang, Y. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition contributes to pulmonary fibrosis via aberrant epithelial/fibroblastic cross-talk. J. Lung Health Dis. 3, 31–35 (2019).
pubmed: 31032489
pmcid: 6485666
doi: 10.29245/2689-999X/2019/2.1149
Gordon, L. B., Harten, I. A., Patti, M. E. & Lichtenstein, A. H. Reduced adiponectin and HDL cholesterol without elevated C-reactive protein: clues to the biology of premature atherosclerosis in Hutchinson–Gilford Progeria Syndrome. J. Pediatr. 146, 336–341 (2005).
pubmed: 15756215
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.10.064
Olive, M. et al. Cardiovascular pathology in Hutchinson–Gilford progeria: correlation with the vascular pathology of aging. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 30, 2301–2309 (2010).
pubmed: 20798379
pmcid: 2965471
doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.209460
López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153, 1194–1217 (2013).
pubmed: 23746838
pmcid: 3836174
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039
Vidak, S. & Foisner, R. Molecular insights into the premature aging disease progeria. Histochem. Cell Biol. 145, 401–417 (2016).
pubmed: 26847180
pmcid: 4796323
doi: 10.1007/s00418-016-1411-1
Sohal, R. S. & Weindruch, R. Oxidative stress, caloric restriction, and aging. Science 273, 59–63 (1996).
pubmed: 8658196
pmcid: 2987625
doi: 10.1126/science.273.5271.59
Redman, L. M. et al. Metabolic slowing and reduced oxidative damage with sustained caloric restriction support the rate of living and oxidative damage theories of aging. Cell Metab. 27, 805–815.e4 (2018).
pubmed: 29576535
pmcid: 5886711
doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.019
Harrison, D. E. et al. Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Nature 460, 392–395 (2009).
pubmed: 19587680
pmcid: 2786175
doi: 10.1038/nature08221
Taormina, G. & Mirisola, M. G. Calorie restriction in mammals and simple model organisms. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 308690 (2014).
pubmed: 24883306
pmcid: 4026914
doi: 10.1155/2014/308690
Unnikrishnan, A., Kurup, K., Salmon, A. B. & Richardson, A. Is rapamycin a dietary restriction mimetic? J. Gerontol. A 75, 4–13 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz060
Jiang, W., Ananthaswamy, H. N., Muller, H. K. & Kripke, M. L. p53 protects against skin cancer induction by UV-B radiation. Oncogene 18, 4247–4253 (1999).
pubmed: 10435637
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202789
Hursting, S. D., Perkins, S. N. & Phang, J. M. Calorie restriction delays spontaneous tumorigenesis in p53-knockout transgenic mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7036–7040 (1994).
pubmed: 8041741
doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7036
pmcid: 44333
Lv, M., Zhu, X., Wang, H., Wang, F. & Guan, W. Roles of caloric restriction, ketogenic diet and intermittent fasting during initiation, progression and metastasis of cancer in animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 9, e115147 (2014).
pubmed: 25502434
pmcid: 4263749
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115147
Colman, R. J. et al. Caloric restriction delays disease onset and mortality in rhesus monkeys. Science 325, 201–204 (2009).
pubmed: 19590001
pmcid: 2812811
doi: 10.1126/science.1173635
Mattison, J. A. et al. Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys: the NIA study. Nature 489, 318–321 (2012).
pubmed: 22932268
doi: 10.1038/nature11432
Scharffetter-Kochanek, K. et al. UV-induced reactive oxygen species in photocarcinogenesis and photoaging. Biol. Chem. 378, 1247–1257 (1997).
pubmed: 9426184
Wondrak, G. T., Jacobson, M. K. & Jacobson, E. L. Endogenous UVA-photosensitizers: mediators of skin photodamage and novel targets for skin photoprotection. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 5, 215–237 (2006).
pubmed: 16465308
doi: 10.1039/b504573h
Rinnerthaler, M., Bischof, J., Streubel, M. K., Trost, A. & Richter, K. Oxidative stress in aging human skin. Biomolecules 5, 545–589 (2015).
pubmed: 25906193
pmcid: 4496685
doi: 10.3390/biom5020545
Michalczyk, T. et al. UVB exposure of a humanized skin model reveals unexpected dynamic of keratinocyte proliferation and Wnt inhibitor balancing. J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. 12, 505–515 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/term.2519
Rittié, L. & Fisher, G. J. Natural and sun-induced aging of human skin. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 5, a015370 (2015).
pubmed: 25561721
pmcid: 4292080
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015370
Azazmeh, N. et al. Chronic expression of p16 INK4a in the epidermis induces Wnt-mediated hyperplasia and promotes tumor initiation. Nat. Commun. 11, 2711 (2020).
pubmed: 32483135
pmcid: 7264228
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16475-3
Clark, R. A. et al. Human squamous cell carcinomas evade the immune response by down-regulation of vascular E-selectin and recruitment of regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 205, 2221–2234 (2008).
pubmed: 18794336
pmcid: 2556796
doi: 10.1084/jem.20071190
Thomas, S. J., Snowden, J. A., Zeidler, M. P. & Danson, S. J. The role of JAK/STAT signalling in the pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment of solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 113, 365–371 (2015).
pubmed: 26151455
pmcid: 4522639
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.233
Sriuranpong, V. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor-independent constitutive activation of STAT3 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is mediated by the autocrine/paracrine stimulation of the interleukin 6/gp130 cytokine system. Cancer Res. 63, 2948–2956 (2003).
pubmed: 12782602
Grandis, J. R. et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling abrogates apoptosis in squamous cell carcinogenesis in vivo. PNAS 97, 4227–4232 (2000).
pubmed: 10760290
doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.8.4227
pmcid: 18206
Südel, K. M. et al. Tight control of matrix metalloproteinase-1 activity in human skin. Photochem. Photobiol. 78, 355–60 (2003).
pubmed: 14626663
doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078<0355:TCOMMA>2.0.CO;2
Andrews, S. s-andrews/FastQC. GitHub https://github.com/s-andrews/FastQC .
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
pubmed: 24695404
pmcid: 4103590
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).
pubmed: 28263959
pmcid: 5600148
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197
Chollet, F. keras-team/keras. GitHub https://github.com/keras-team/keras .
Abadi, M. et al. TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16) 265–283 (The Advanced Computing Systems Association, 2016).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. The R Foundation (2018).
Clevert, D. -A., Unterthiner, T. & Hochreiter, S. Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs). Preprint at arXiv:1511.07289 [cs] (2015).
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification. Preprint at arXiv:1502.01852 [cs] (2015).
Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. Preprint at arXiv:1412.6980 [cs] (2017).
Maaten, L. vander & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
Krijthe, J. jkrijthe/Rtsne. GitHub https://github.com/jkrijthe/Rtsne .
Durinck, S. & Huber, W. biomaRt: Interface to BioMart databases (i.e. Ensembl). Bioconductor (2019).
Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979).
Dowle, M. & Srinivasan, A. data.table: Extension of ‘data.frame‘. (CRAN, 2018).
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. & Müller, K. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. (CRAN, 2019).
Wickham, H. et al. ggplot2: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics. (CRAN, 2018).
Kassambara, A. ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ Based Publication Ready Plots. (CRAN, 2018).
Casella, G. et al. Transcriptome signature of cellular senescence. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 7294–7305 (2019).
pubmed: 31251810
pmcid: 6698740
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz555