Modeling transcriptomic age using knowledge-primed artificial neural networks.


Journal

NPJ aging and mechanisms of disease
ISSN: 2056-3973
Titre abrégé: NPJ Aging Mech Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101678947

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 12 08 2020
accepted: 26 04 2021
entrez: 2 6 2021
pubmed: 3 6 2021
medline: 3 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The development of 'age clocks', machine learning models predicting age from biological data, has been a major milestone in the search for reliable markers of biological age and has since become an invaluable tool in aging research. However, beyond their unquestionable utility, current clocks offer little insight into the molecular biological processes driving aging, and their inner workings often remain non-transparent. Here we propose a new type of age clock, one that couples predictivity with interpretability of the underlying biology, achieved through the incorporation of prior knowledge into the model design. The clock, an artificial neural network constructed according to well-described biological pathways, allows the prediction of age from gene expression data of skin tissue with high accuracy, while at the same time capturing and revealing aging states of the pathways driving the prediction. The model recapitulates known associations of aging gene knockdowns in simulation experiments and demonstrates its utility in deciphering the main pathways by which accelerated aging conditions such as Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome, as well as pro-longevity interventions like caloric restriction, exert their effects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34075044
doi: 10.1038/s41514-021-00068-5
pii: 10.1038/s41514-021-00068-5
pmc: PMC8169742
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

15

Références

Bocklandt, S. et al. Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS ONE 6, e14821 (2011).
pubmed: 21731603 pmcid: 3120753 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014821
Hannum, G. et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol. Cell 49, 359–367 (2013).
pubmed: 23177740 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016
Horvath, S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 14, R115 (2013).
pubmed: 24138928 pmcid: 4015143 doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
Holly, A. C. et al. Towards a gene expression biomarker set for human biological age. Aging Cell 12, 324–326 (2013).
pubmed: 23311345 doi: 10.1111/acel.12044
Peters, M. J. et al. The transcriptional landscape of age in human peripheral blood. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–14 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms9570
Hertel, J. et al. Measuring biological age via metabonomics: the metabolic age score. J. Proteome Res. 15, 400–410 (2016).
pubmed: 26652958 doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00561
Mamoshina, P. et al. Machine learning on human muscle transcriptomic data for biomarker discovery and tissue-specific drug target identification. Front. Genet. 9, 242 (2018).
pubmed: 30050560 pmcid: 6052089 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00242
Fleischer, J. G. et al. Predicting age from the transcriptome of human dermal fibroblasts. Genome Biol. 19, 221 (2018).
pubmed: 30567591 pmcid: 6300908 doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1599-6
Tanaka, T. et al. Plasma proteomic signature of age in healthy humans. Aging Cell 17, 5 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/acel.12799
Ma, J. et al. Using deep learning to model the hierarchical structure and function of a cell. Nat. Methods 15, 290–298 (2018).
pubmed: 29505029 pmcid: 5882547 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4627
Scharffetter-Kochanek, K. et al. Photoaging of the skin from phenotype to mechanisms. Exp. Gerontol. 35, 307–316 (2000).
pubmed: 10832052 doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(00)00098-X
Völzke, H. et al. Cohort profile: the study of health in Pomerania. Int. J. Epidemiol. 40, 294–307 (2011).
pubmed: 20167617 doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp394
Liberzon, A. et al. The molecular signatures database hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425 (2015).
pubmed: 26771021 pmcid: 4707969 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004
Hansen, L. K. & Salamon, P. Neural network ensembles. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12, 993–1001 (1990).
doi: 10.1109/34.58871
Bormann, F. et al. Reduced DNA methylation patterning and transcriptional connectivity define human skin aging. Aging Cell 15, 563–71 (2016).
pubmed: 27004597 pmcid: 4854925 doi: 10.1111/acel.12470
Holzscheck, N. et al. Multi-omics network analysis reveals distinct stages in the human aging progression in epidermal tissue. Aging 12, 12393–12409 (2020).
pubmed: 32554863 pmcid: 7343460 doi: 10.18632/aging.103499
Galkin, F. et al. Biohorology and biomarkers of aging: current state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Ageing Res. Rev. 60, 101050 (2020).
pubmed: 32272169 doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101050
Gladyshev, V. N. Aging: progressive decline in fitness due to the rising deleteriome adjusted by genetic, environmental, and stochastic processes. Aging Cell 15, 594–602 (2016).
pubmed: 27060562 pmcid: 4933668 doi: 10.1111/acel.12480
Harman, D. Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J. Gerontol. 11, 298–300 (1956).
pubmed: 13332224 doi: 10.1093/geronj/11.3.298
Williams, G. C. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11, 398–411 (1957).
doi: 10.2307/2406060
Boily, G. et al. SirT1 regulates energy metabolism and response to caloric restriction in mice. PLoS ONE 3, e1759 (2008).
pubmed: 18335035 pmcid: 2258149 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001759
Herranz, D. et al. Sirt1 improves healthy ageing and protects from metabolic syndrome-associated cancer. Nat. Commun. 1, 3 (2010).
pubmed: 20975665 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1001
Satoh, A. et al. Sirt1 extends life span and delays aging in mice through the regulation of Nk2 homeobox 1 in the DMH and LH. Cell Metab. 18, 416–430 (2013).
pubmed: 24011076 pmcid: 3794712 doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.07.013
Kim, D. H., Jung, I. H., Kim, D. H. & Park, S. W. Knockout of longevity gene Sirt1 in zebrafish leads to oxidative injury, chronic inflammation, and reduced life span. PLOS ONE 14, e0220581 (2019).
pubmed: 31386694 pmcid: 6684063 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220581
Huy, H. et al. TXNIP regulates AKT-mediated cellular senescence by direct interaction under glucose-mediated metabolic stress. Aging Cell 17, 6 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/acel.12836
Oberacker, T. et al. Enhanced expression of thioredoxin‐interacting‐protein regulates oxidative DNA damage and aging. FEBS Lett. 592, 2297–2307 (2018).
pubmed: 29897613 pmcid: 6099297 doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13156
Khan, S. S. et al. A null mutation in SERPINE1 protects against biological aging in humans. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao1617 (2017).
pubmed: 29152572 pmcid: 5687852 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao1617
Wong, C.-W. et al. Krüppel-like transcription factor 4 contributes to maintenance of telomerase activity in stem cells. Stem Cells 28, 1510–1517 (2010).
pubmed: 20629177 doi: 10.1002/stem.477
Panatta, E. et al. Kruppel-like factor 4 regulates keratinocyte senescence. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 499, 389–395 (2018).
pubmed: 29580988 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.03.172
Kuehne, A. et al. An integrative metabolomics and transcriptomics study to identify metabolic alterations in aged skin of humans in vivo. BMC Genomics 18, 169 (2017).
pubmed: 28201987 pmcid: 5312537 doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3547-3
Hennekam, R. C. M. Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome: review of the phenotype. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 140, 2603–2624 (2006).
pubmed: 16838330 doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31346
Gordon, L. B. et al. Impact of farnesylation inhibitors on survival in Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome. Circulation 130, 27–34 (2014).
pubmed: 24795390 pmcid: 4082404 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008285
Csoka, A. B. et al. Genome-scale expression profiling of Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome reveals widespread transcriptional misregulation leading to mesodermal/mesenchymal defects and accelerated atherosclerosis. Aging Cell 3, 235–243 (2004).
pubmed: 15268757 doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00105.x
Yan, W. et al. Transcriptome analysis of skin photoaging in Chinese females reveals the involvement of skin homeostasis and metabolic changes. PLOS ONE 8, e61946 (2013).
pubmed: 23637934 pmcid: 3634825 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061946
Röwert-Huber, J. et al. Actinic keratosis is an early in situ squamous cell carcinoma: a proposal for reclassification. Br. J. Dermatol. 156, 8–12 (2007).
pubmed: 17488400 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07860.x
Glogau, R. G. The risk of progression to invasive disease. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 42, 23–24 (2000).
pubmed: 10607353 doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.103339
Lambert, S. R. et al. Key differences identified between actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by transcriptome profiling. Br. J. Cancer 110, 520–529 (2014).
pubmed: 24335922 doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.760
Armstrong, B. K. & Kricker, A. The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 63, 8–18 (2001).
pubmed: 11684447 doi: 10.1016/S1011-1344(01)00198-1
Hoang, V. L. T. et al. RNA-seq reveals more consistent reference genes for gene expression studies in human non-melanoma skin cancers. PeerJ 5, e3631 (2017).
pubmed: 28852586 pmcid: 5572537 doi: 10.7717/peerj.3631
Aunan, J. R., Cho, W. C. & Søreide, K. The biology of aging and cancer: a brief overview of shared and divergent molecular hallmarks. Aging Dis. 8, 628–642 (2017).
pubmed: 28966806 pmcid: 5614326 doi: 10.14336/AD.2017.0103
National Cancer Institute (NCI). SEER Cancer Statistics Review (CSR) 1975–2014. https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2014/ (2018).
Krtolica, A., Parrinello, S., Lockett, S., Desprez, P. Y. & Campisi, J. Senescent fibroblasts promote epithelial cell growth and tumorigenesis: a link between cancer and aging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12072–12077 (2001).
pubmed: 11593017 doi: 10.1073/pnas.211053698 pmcid: 59769
Demaria, M. et al. An essential role for senescent cells in optimal wound healing through secretion of PDGF-AA. Dev. Cell 31, 722–733 (2014).
pubmed: 25499914 pmcid: 4349629 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.012
Salminen, A., Kaarniranta, K. & Kauppinen, A. Inflammaging: disturbed interplay between autophagy and inflammasomes. Aging 4, 166–175 (2012).
pubmed: 22411934 pmcid: 3348477 doi: 10.18632/aging.100444
Franceschi, C., Garagnani, P., Parini, P., Giuliani, C. & Santoro, A. Inflammaging: a new immune–metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14, 576–590 (2018).
pubmed: 30046148 doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0059-4
Sturm, G. et al. Human aging DNA methylation signatures are conserved but accelerated in cultured fibroblasts. Epigenetics 14, 961–976 (2019).
pubmed: 31156022 pmcid: 6691995 doi: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1626651
Hodges, A. & Smoller, B. R. Immunohistochemical comparison of p16 expression in actinic keratoses and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Mod. Pathol. 15, 1121–1125 (2002).
pubmed: 12429789 doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000032536.48264.D1
Toutfaire, M. et al. Unraveling the interplay between senescent dermal fibroblasts and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma cell lines at different stages of tumorigenesis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 98, 113–126 (2018).
pubmed: 29550586 doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2018.03.005
Weindruch, R. & Walford, R. L. Dietary restriction in mice beginning at 1 year of age: effect on life-span and spontaneous cancer incidence. Science 215, 1415–1418 (1982).
pubmed: 7063854 doi: 10.1126/science.7063854
Lee, C. & Longo, V. Dietary restriction with and without caloric restriction for healthy aging. F1000Res 5, 117 (2016).
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7136.1
Ma, S. et al. Caloric restriction reprograms the single-cell transcriptional landsc. Rattus Norvegicus-. Aging Cell 180, 984–1001.e22 (2020).
Chen, C.-N. J., Lin, S.-Y., Liao, Y.-H., Li, Z.-J. & Wong, A. M.-K. Late-onset caloric restriction alters skeletal muscle metabolism by modulating pyruvate metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 308, E942–949 (2015).
pubmed: 26032513 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00508.2014
Chen, C.-N., Liao, Y.-H., Tsai, S.-C. & Thompson, L. V. Age-dependent effects of caloric restriction on mTOR and ubiquitin-proteasome pathways in skeletal muscles. GeroScience 41, 871–880 (2019).
pubmed: 31676964 pmcid: 6925080 doi: 10.1007/s11357-019-00109-8
Pifferi, F. et al. Caloric restriction increases lifespan but affects brain integrity in grey mouse lemur primates. Commun. Biol. 1, 1–8 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0024-8
Kalluri, R. & Neilson, E. G. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition and its implications for fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 112, 1776–1784 (2003).
pubmed: 14679171 doi: 10.1172/JCI200320530 pmcid: 297008
Hill, C., Jones, M. G., Davies, D. E. & Wang, Y. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition contributes to pulmonary fibrosis via aberrant epithelial/fibroblastic cross-talk. J. Lung Health Dis. 3, 31–35 (2019).
pubmed: 31032489 pmcid: 6485666 doi: 10.29245/2689-999X/2019/2.1149
Gordon, L. B., Harten, I. A., Patti, M. E. & Lichtenstein, A. H. Reduced adiponectin and HDL cholesterol without elevated C-reactive protein: clues to the biology of premature atherosclerosis in Hutchinson–Gilford Progeria Syndrome. J. Pediatr. 146, 336–341 (2005).
pubmed: 15756215 doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.10.064
Olive, M. et al. Cardiovascular pathology in Hutchinson–Gilford progeria: correlation with the vascular pathology of aging. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 30, 2301–2309 (2010).
pubmed: 20798379 pmcid: 2965471 doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.209460
López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153, 1194–1217 (2013).
pubmed: 23746838 pmcid: 3836174 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039
Vidak, S. & Foisner, R. Molecular insights into the premature aging disease progeria. Histochem. Cell Biol. 145, 401–417 (2016).
pubmed: 26847180 pmcid: 4796323 doi: 10.1007/s00418-016-1411-1
Sohal, R. S. & Weindruch, R. Oxidative stress, caloric restriction, and aging. Science 273, 59–63 (1996).
pubmed: 8658196 pmcid: 2987625 doi: 10.1126/science.273.5271.59
Redman, L. M. et al. Metabolic slowing and reduced oxidative damage with sustained caloric restriction support the rate of living and oxidative damage theories of aging. Cell Metab. 27, 805–815.e4 (2018).
pubmed: 29576535 pmcid: 5886711 doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.019
Harrison, D. E. et al. Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Nature 460, 392–395 (2009).
pubmed: 19587680 pmcid: 2786175 doi: 10.1038/nature08221
Taormina, G. & Mirisola, M. G. Calorie restriction in mammals and simple model organisms. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 308690 (2014).
pubmed: 24883306 pmcid: 4026914 doi: 10.1155/2014/308690
Unnikrishnan, A., Kurup, K., Salmon, A. B. & Richardson, A. Is rapamycin a dietary restriction mimetic? J. Gerontol. A 75, 4–13 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz060
Jiang, W., Ananthaswamy, H. N., Muller, H. K. & Kripke, M. L. p53 protects against skin cancer induction by UV-B radiation. Oncogene 18, 4247–4253 (1999).
pubmed: 10435637 doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202789
Hursting, S. D., Perkins, S. N. & Phang, J. M. Calorie restriction delays spontaneous tumorigenesis in p53-knockout transgenic mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7036–7040 (1994).
pubmed: 8041741 doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7036 pmcid: 44333
Lv, M., Zhu, X., Wang, H., Wang, F. & Guan, W. Roles of caloric restriction, ketogenic diet and intermittent fasting during initiation, progression and metastasis of cancer in animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 9, e115147 (2014).
pubmed: 25502434 pmcid: 4263749 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115147
Colman, R. J. et al. Caloric restriction delays disease onset and mortality in rhesus monkeys. Science 325, 201–204 (2009).
pubmed: 19590001 pmcid: 2812811 doi: 10.1126/science.1173635
Mattison, J. A. et al. Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys: the NIA study. Nature 489, 318–321 (2012).
pubmed: 22932268 doi: 10.1038/nature11432
Scharffetter-Kochanek, K. et al. UV-induced reactive oxygen species in photocarcinogenesis and photoaging. Biol. Chem. 378, 1247–1257 (1997).
pubmed: 9426184
Wondrak, G. T., Jacobson, M. K. & Jacobson, E. L. Endogenous UVA-photosensitizers: mediators of skin photodamage and novel targets for skin photoprotection. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 5, 215–237 (2006).
pubmed: 16465308 doi: 10.1039/b504573h
Rinnerthaler, M., Bischof, J., Streubel, M. K., Trost, A. & Richter, K. Oxidative stress in aging human skin. Biomolecules 5, 545–589 (2015).
pubmed: 25906193 pmcid: 4496685 doi: 10.3390/biom5020545
Michalczyk, T. et al. UVB exposure of a humanized skin model reveals unexpected dynamic of keratinocyte proliferation and Wnt inhibitor balancing. J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. 12, 505–515 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/term.2519
Rittié, L. & Fisher, G. J. Natural and sun-induced aging of human skin. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 5, a015370 (2015).
pubmed: 25561721 pmcid: 4292080 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015370
Azazmeh, N. et al. Chronic expression of p16 INK4a in the epidermis induces Wnt-mediated hyperplasia and promotes tumor initiation. Nat. Commun. 11, 2711 (2020).
pubmed: 32483135 pmcid: 7264228 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16475-3
Clark, R. A. et al. Human squamous cell carcinomas evade the immune response by down-regulation of vascular E-selectin and recruitment of regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 205, 2221–2234 (2008).
pubmed: 18794336 pmcid: 2556796 doi: 10.1084/jem.20071190
Thomas, S. J., Snowden, J. A., Zeidler, M. P. & Danson, S. J. The role of JAK/STAT signalling in the pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment of solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 113, 365–371 (2015).
pubmed: 26151455 pmcid: 4522639 doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.233
Sriuranpong, V. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor-independent constitutive activation of STAT3 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is mediated by the autocrine/paracrine stimulation of the interleukin 6/gp130 cytokine system. Cancer Res. 63, 2948–2956 (2003).
pubmed: 12782602
Grandis, J. R. et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling abrogates apoptosis in squamous cell carcinogenesis in vivo. PNAS 97, 4227–4232 (2000).
pubmed: 10760290 doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.8.4227 pmcid: 18206
Südel, K. M. et al. Tight control of matrix metalloproteinase-1 activity in human skin. Photochem. Photobiol. 78, 355–60 (2003).
pubmed: 14626663 doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078<0355:TCOMMA>2.0.CO;2
Andrews, S. s-andrews/FastQC. GitHub https://github.com/s-andrews/FastQC .
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
pubmed: 24695404 pmcid: 4103590 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).
pubmed: 28263959 pmcid: 5600148 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197
Chollet, F. keras-team/keras. GitHub https://github.com/keras-team/keras .
Abadi, M. et al. TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16) 265–283 (The Advanced Computing Systems Association, 2016).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. The R Foundation (2018).
Clevert, D. -A., Unterthiner, T. & Hochreiter, S. Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs). Preprint at arXiv:1511.07289 [cs] (2015).
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification. Preprint at arXiv:1502.01852 [cs] (2015).
Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. Preprint at arXiv:1412.6980 [cs] (2017).
Maaten, L. vander & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
Krijthe, J. jkrijthe/Rtsne. GitHub https://github.com/jkrijthe/Rtsne .
Durinck, S. & Huber, W. biomaRt: Interface to BioMart databases (i.e. Ensembl). Bioconductor (2019).
Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979).
Dowle, M. & Srinivasan, A. data.table: Extension of ‘data.frame‘. (CRAN, 2018).
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. & Müller, K. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. (CRAN, 2019).
Wickham, H. et al. ggplot2: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics. (CRAN, 2018).
Kassambara, A. ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ Based Publication Ready Plots. (CRAN, 2018).
Casella, G. et al. Transcriptome signature of cellular senescence. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 7294–7305 (2019).
pubmed: 31251810 pmcid: 6698740 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz555

Auteurs

Nicholas Holzscheck (N)

Front End Innovation, Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany. nicholas.holzscheck@beiersdorf.com.
Institute for Bioinformatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. nicholas.holzscheck@beiersdorf.com.

Cassandra Falckenhayn (C)

Front End Innovation, Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.

Jörn Söhle (J)

Front End Innovation, Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.

Boris Kristof (B)

Front End Innovation, Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.

Ralf Siegner (R)

Front End Innovation, Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.

André Werner (A)

Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Janka Schössow (J)

Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Clemens Jürgens (C)

Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Henry Völzke (H)

Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Horst Wenck (H)

Front End Innovation, Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.

Marc Winnefeld (M)

Front End Innovation, Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.

Elke Grönniger (E)

Front End Innovation, Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.

Lars Kaderali (L)

Institute for Bioinformatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. lars.kaderali@uni-greifswald.de.

Classifications MeSH