Experiences with scans and scanxiety in people with advanced cancer: a qualitative study.
Anxiety
Cancer
Imaging
Qualitative study
Scans
Scanxiety
Journal
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
ISSN: 1433-7339
Titre abrégé: Support Care Cancer
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9302957
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
18
02
2021
accepted:
27
05
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
entrez:
2
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Scan-associated anxiety ('scanxiety') in people with advanced cancer is a common clinical problem. This study aims to explore the experiences of scans and scanxiety in people with advanced cancer, including their strategies to reduce scanxiety. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with people with advanced cancers who had a computed tomography scan for monitoring of their cancer. Data was analysed with an interpretivist approach using framework analysis. Interviews with 16 participants identified three key themes: the scan experience, the scanxiety experience and coping with scans. Scans were viewed as a routine and normal part of cancer care. Scanxiety was experienced differently by each person. Scanxiety often related to the scan result rather than the scan and led to psycho-cognitive manifestations. Adaptive coping strategies were often self-derived. People with advanced cancer experience scanxiety, but often accept scanxiety as a normal part of the cancer process. The findings fit within a transactional model of stress and coping, which influences the level of scanxiety for each individual. Quantitative research to determine the scope of scanxiety will be useful to develop formal approaches to reduce scanxiety.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34076779
doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06319-1
pii: 10.1007/s00520-021-06319-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7441-7449Informations de copyright
© 2021. Crown.
Références
Feiler B (2011) Scanxiety. Time 177. http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2075133_2075127_2075107,00.html
Mathers SA, McKenzie GA, Robertson EM (2011) A necessary evil: the experiences of men with prostate cancer undergoing imaging procedures. Radiography 17(4):284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2011.06.005
doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2011.06.005
Truesdale-Kennedy M, Taggart L, McIlfatrick S (2011) Breast cancer knowledge among women with intellectual disabilities and their experiences of receiving breast mammography. J Adv Nurs 67(6):1294–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05595.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05595.x
pubmed: 21366669
Strand T, Törnqvist E, Rask M, Roxberg Å (2014) The experience of patients with neoplasm metastasis in the spine during a magnetic resonance imaging examination. J Radiol Nurs 33(4):191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jradnu.2014.09.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2014.09.001
Brandzel S, Rosenberg DE, Johnson D, Bush M, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Henderson L, Nekhlyudov L, DeMartini W, Wernli KJ (2017) Women’s experiences and preferences regarding breast imaging after completing breast cancer treatment. Patient Prefer Adherence 11:199–204. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S122244
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S122244
pubmed: 28203064
pmcid: 5295805
Evans R, Taylor S, Janes S, Halligan S, Morton A, Navani N, Oliver A, Rockall A, Teague J, Miles A, Streamline trials i (2017) Patient experience and perceived acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal and lung cancer compared with current staging scans: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 7(9):e016391. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016391
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016391
pubmed: 28882915
pmcid: 5588966
Bui KT, Liang R, Kiely BE, Brown C, Dhillon HM, Blinman P (2021) Scanxiety: a scoping review about scan-associated anxiety. BMJ Open 11(5):e043215. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043215
Thorne S (2016) Interpretive description: qualitative research for applied practice. Developing Qualitative Inquiry, Second edition edn. Routledge, New York
doi: 10.4324/9781315426259
Ritchie J, Lewis J (2003) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications, London
Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
pubmed: 24047204
pmcid: 3848812
Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Pub. Co., New York