Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry.
early gastric cancer
en-bloc
endoscopic resection
endoscopic submucosal dissection
gastric premalignant lesions
resection
Journal
United European gastroenterology journal
ISSN: 2050-6414
Titre abrégé: United European Gastroenterol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101606807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
08
01
2021
accepted:
16
03
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
28
1
2022
entrez:
2
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the treatment of choice for early gastric malignancies. In recent years, the ESD technique has been implemented in Western countries with increasing use. To describe the results of gastric ESD in a Western country with a low incidence of gastric cancer. The prospective national registry was conducted over 4 years in 23 hospitals, including 30 endoscopists. Epithelial and subepithelial lesions (SEL) qualified to complete removal with ESD were assessed. The technique, instruments, and solution for submucosal injection varied at the endoscopist's discretion. ESD was defined as difficult when: en-bloc resection was not achieved, had to be converted to a hybrid resection, lasted more than 2 h or an intraprocedural perforation occurred. Additionally, independent risk factors for difficult ESD were analyzed. Two hundred and thirty gastric ESD in 225 patients were performed from January 2016 to December 2019 (196 epithelial and 34 SEL). Most lesions were located in the lower stomach (111; 48.3%). One hundred and twenty-eight (55.6%) ESD were considered difficult. The median procedure time was 105 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-150). The procedure time for SEL was shorter than for epithelial lesions (90 min [45-121] vs. 110 min [62-160]; p = 0.038). En-bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 91.3%, 75.2%, and 70.9%, respectively. Difficult ESD had lower R0 resection rates than ESD that did not meet the difficulty criteria (64.8% and 87.6%; p = 0.000, respectively). Fibrosis and poor maneuverability were independent factors associated with difficult ESD (OR 3.6, 95%CI 1.1-11.74 and OR 5.07, 95%CI 1.6-16.08; respectively). Although the number of cases is limited, the results of this analysis show acceptable en-bloc and R0 rates in gastric ESD considering the wide variability in experience among the operators. Fibrosis and poor maneuverability were associated with more difficulty in completing ESD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34077636
doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12101
pmc: PMC8280798
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
718-726Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1617-1626
pubmed: 27495343
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1166-74
pubmed: 22482915
Endoscopy. 2009 Sep;41(9):751-7
pubmed: 19693750
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;50(3):368-75
pubmed: 25582554
Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):30-39
pubmed: 29969807
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2020 Mar;112(3):189-194
pubmed: 32022570
Clin Endosc. 2013 Sep;46(5):456-62
pubmed: 24143302
Endoscopy. 2014 Oct;46(10):836-43
pubmed: 25230136
Endoscopy. 2017 Sep;49(9):855-865
pubmed: 28564714
Updates Surg. 2019 Jun;71(2):359-365
pubmed: 30710244
Endoscopy. 2006 Oct;38(10):987-90
pubmed: 17058162
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Apr;91(4):868-878.e3
pubmed: 31655045
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1422-7
pubmed: 23093235
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Jul;9(6):718-726
pubmed: 34077636
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43
pubmed: 14652541
Endoscopy. 2010 Dec;42(12):1037-44
pubmed: 20972955
Int J Surg. 2014;12(7):700-5
pubmed: 24866069
Gastroenterology. 2019 Nov;157(5):1213-1221.e4
pubmed: 31362007
Endoscopy. 2011 Aug;43(8):664-70
pubmed: 21623560
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun 21;24(23):2518-2536
pubmed: 29930473
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):467-479.e4
pubmed: 31077699
Endoscopy. 2019 Oct;51(10):980-992
pubmed: 31470448
Endoscopy. 2010 Oct;42(10):814-9
pubmed: 20886399
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;27(1):1-17
pubmed: 31970235
Endoscopy. 2010 Oct;42(10):853-8
pubmed: 20623442
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1507-9
pubmed: 20044771
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):911-6
pubmed: 21296348
Endoscopy. 2015 Sep;47(9):829-54
pubmed: 26317585
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Feb;69(2):350-5
pubmed: 19185696