A compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions.
delusions
intervention
psychosis
schizophrenia
self-esteem
therapy
Journal
Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy
ISSN: 1469-1833
Titre abrégé: Behav Cogn Psychother
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9418292
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
4
6
2021
medline:
5
1
2022
entrez:
3
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Negative beliefs about the self, including low self-compassion, have been identified as a putative causal factor in the occurrence of paranoia. Therefore, improving self-compassion may be one route to reduce paranoia. To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinical effects of a brief compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions. Twelve patients with persecutory delusions received an individual four-session compassionate imagery intervention. Assessments of self-concept and paranoia were completed before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 1-month follow-up. A qualitative study exploring participants' experiences of the treatment was also completed. Twelve out of 14 eligible patients referred to the study agreed to take part. All participants completed all therapy sessions and assessments. Post-treatment, there were improvements in self-compassion (change score -0.64, 95% CI -1.04, -0.24, d = -1.78), negative beliefs about the self (change score 2.42, 95% CI -0.37, 5.20, d = 0.51), and paranoia (change score 10.08, 95% CI 3.47, 16.69, d = 0.61). There were no serious adverse events. Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: 'effortful learning', 'seeing change' and 'taking it forward'. Participants described a process of active and effortful engagement in therapy which was rewarded with positive changes, including feeling calmer, gaining clarity, and developing acceptance. This uncontrolled feasibility study indicates that a brief compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions is feasible, acceptable, and may lead to clinical benefits.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Negative beliefs about the self, including low self-compassion, have been identified as a putative causal factor in the occurrence of paranoia. Therefore, improving self-compassion may be one route to reduce paranoia.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinical effects of a brief compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions.
METHOD
METHODS
Twelve patients with persecutory delusions received an individual four-session compassionate imagery intervention. Assessments of self-concept and paranoia were completed before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 1-month follow-up. A qualitative study exploring participants' experiences of the treatment was also completed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twelve out of 14 eligible patients referred to the study agreed to take part. All participants completed all therapy sessions and assessments. Post-treatment, there were improvements in self-compassion (change score -0.64, 95% CI -1.04, -0.24, d = -1.78), negative beliefs about the self (change score 2.42, 95% CI -0.37, 5.20, d = 0.51), and paranoia (change score 10.08, 95% CI 3.47, 16.69, d = 0.61). There were no serious adverse events. Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: 'effortful learning', 'seeing change' and 'taking it forward'. Participants described a process of active and effortful engagement in therapy which was rewarded with positive changes, including feeling calmer, gaining clarity, and developing acceptance.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This uncontrolled feasibility study indicates that a brief compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions is feasible, acceptable, and may lead to clinical benefits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34078499
pii: S1352465821000229
doi: 10.1017/S1352465821000229
pmc: PMC9019554
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15-27Références
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Nov;19(93):1-115, v-vi
pubmed: 26560448
Schizophr Res. 2019 Sep;211:44-50
pubmed: 31326234
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Oct 30;189(3):339-43
pubmed: 21715017
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Mar;24(2):348-358
pubmed: 26888312
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2016 Jan;44(1):56-64
pubmed: 25384608
Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 May;27(4):425-57
pubmed: 17258852
Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;54(7):766-89
pubmed: 23684547
Psychiatry Res. 2014 May 30;216(3):303-13
pubmed: 24630916
Psychiatry Res. 2016 May 30;239:79-84
pubmed: 27137965
Psychol Med. 2006 Jun;36(6):749-59
pubmed: 16563204
Schizophr Res. 2014 Dec;160(1-3):186-92
pubmed: 25468186
Sci Rep. 2020 May 22;10(1):8547
pubmed: 32444619
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 01;10:152
pubmed: 30774614
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2020 Sep;48(5):530-545
pubmed: 32264985
Psychol Med. 2021 Jan;51(2):244-253
pubmed: 31744588
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;3(7):685-92
pubmed: 27371990
Trials. 2017 Nov 2;18(1):510
pubmed: 29096681
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Psychol Med. 2008 Jan;38(1):101-11
pubmed: 17903336
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12
pubmed: 15189396
Br J Clin Psychol. 1999 Jun;38(2):113-54
pubmed: 10389596