Optimizing Critical Illness Recovery: Perspectives and Solutions From the Caregivers of ICU Survivors.
caregivers
critical illness
intensive care unit follow-up clinics
peer support
postintensive care syndrome
Journal
Critical care explorations
ISSN: 2639-8028
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Explor
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
entrez:
3
6
2021
pubmed:
4
6
2021
medline:
4
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To understand the unmet needs of caregivers of ICU survivors, how they accessed support post ICU, and the key components of beneficial ICU recovery support systems as identified from a caregiver perspective. International, qualitative study. We conducted 20 semistructured interviews with a diverse group of caregivers in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, 11 of whom had interacted with an ICU recovery program. Seven hospitals in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. None. Content analysis was used to explore prevalent themes related to unmet needs, as well as perceived strategies to improve ICU outcomes. Post-ICU care was perceived to be generally inadequate. Desired caregiver support fell into two main categories: practical support and emotional support. Successful care delivery initiatives included structured programs, such as post discharge telephone calls, home health programs, post-ICU clinics, and peer support groups, and standing information resources, such as written educational materials and online resources. This qualitative, multicenter, international study of caregivers of critical illness survivors identified consistently unmet needs, means by which caregivers accessed support post ICU, and several care mechanisms identified by caregivers as supporting optimal ICU recovery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34079948
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000420
pmc: PMC8162533
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0420Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K12 HL137943
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Drs. Sevin, Boehm, Quasim, Haines, and McPeake received funding from Society of Critical Care Medicineto undertake this work. Dr. Boehm is funded by the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K12 HL137943) as is Dr. Iwashyna (K12 HL138039). Dr. McPeake is funded by a THIS Institute Post-Doctoral Fellowship (PD-2019-02-16). The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Références
Am J Crit Care. 2021 Mar 1;30(2):145-149
pubmed: 33566086
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Aug;71(8):1892-903
pubmed: 25827018
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Nov;16(11):1405-1413
pubmed: 31394924
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1497-1504
pubmed: 31517693
Qual Life Res. 2017 Mar;26(3):685-693
pubmed: 28000094
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jul;45(7):939-947
pubmed: 31165227
J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):242-9
pubmed: 25466314
Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;47(9):1194-1200
pubmed: 31241499
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):103-128
pubmed: 27984278
Am J Crit Care. 2019 Nov;28(6):481-485
pubmed: 31676524
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Aug;52(8):713-723
pubmed: 29457491
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Feb;35(4):315-24
pubmed: 22686259
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Apr 29;2(4):e0088
pubmed: 32426730
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Nov;73(11):2547-2557
pubmed: 28440958
Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):268-272
pubmed: 30653056
Crit Care Med. 2015 May;43(5):1112-20
pubmed: 25654174
Heart Lung. 2018 Jul - Aug;47(4):401-407
pubmed: 29731146
Crit Care. 2016 Jan 21;20:16
pubmed: 26792081
Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;47(10):1337-1345
pubmed: 31385881
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019 Oct;25(5):473-488
pubmed: 31356238