Serum Amylase Levels is a Predictor for Negative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones.


Journal

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
ISSN: 1534-4908
Titre abrégé: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100888751

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 02 12 2020
accepted: 04 01 2021
pubmed: 4 6 2021
medline: 25 11 2021
entrez: 3 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Negative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for suspected common bile duct stones (CBDS) may be associated with significant morbidity and should be avoided. Between 2010 and 2018, 85 patients who have undergone negative ERCP for suspected CBDS were retrospectively evaluated and compared with 318 patients with positive findings. Predictors for negative ERCP were assessed. Patients with negative ERCP were younger; had increased levels of serum amylase, alanine transaminase, and lactate dehydrogenase; and increased hemoglobin. Even though preprocedure computed tomography (CT) or ultrasonography demonstrating CBDS were highly predictive of positive findings on ERCP, of the 212 patients with CBDS on computed tomography or ultrasonography, 17 (8%) eventually had a negative ERCP, suggesting spontaneous stone passage. An increased serum amylase level was the only predictor for negative ERCP in multivariate analysis, including in patients with preprocedure CBDS on imaging. The data suggest that assessing serum amylase may assist in avoiding unnecessary examinations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34080823
pii: 00129689-202110000-00006
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000916
doi:

Substances chimiques

Amylases EC 3.2.1.-

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

528-532

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Références

Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, et al. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg. 2004;239:28–33.
Committee ASoP, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1–9.
Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis. Lancet. 1996;347:75–79.
Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2019;51:472–491.
Szary NM, Al-Kawas FH. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013;9:496–504.
Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020;52:127–149.
Rustagi T, Jamidar PA. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse events: general overview. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015;25:97–106.
Rustagi T, Jamidar PA. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related adverse events: post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015;25:107–121.
Weiser R, Pencovich N, Mlynarsky L, et al. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: experience of a tertiary center. Surgery. 2017;161:920–929.
Prachayakul V, Aswakul P. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: management and prevention. World J Clin Cases. 2014;2:522–527.
Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Hachiya J. Magnetic resonance cholangiography using half-Fourier acquisition for diagnosing choledocholithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1886–1890.
Iannicelli E, Sessa B, Argnani L, et al. Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary disease. Clin Ter. 2006;157:425–429.
Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut. 1999;44:118–122.
Costi R, Iusco DR, Sarli L. Evaluation of the predictors of choledocholithiasis: comparative analysis of clinical, biochemical, radiological, radionuclear, and intraoperative parameters. Surg Today. 2005;35:1095–1096.
Abboud PA, Malet PF, Berlin JA, et al. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:450–455.
Committee ASoP, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:1075–1105.
Itoi T, Ikeuchi N, Sofuni A, et al. Spontaneous passage of bile duct stone, mimicking laying an egg (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1389; discussion 1390.
Frossard JL, Hadengue A, Amouyal G, et al. Choledocholithiasis: a prospective study of spontaneous common bile duct stone migration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:175–179.
Khoury T, Adileh M, Imam A, et al. Parameters suggesting spontaneous passage of stones from common bile duct: a retrospective study. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;2019:5382708.
Lefemine V, Morgan RJ. Spontaneous passage of common bile duct stones in jaundiced patients. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011;10:209–213.
Tranter SE, Thompson MH. Spontaneous passage of bile duct stones: frequency of occurrence and relation to clinical presentation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003;85:174–177.
Liu TH, Moody FG. Pathogenesis and presentation of common bile duct stones. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2000;7:224–231.
Tazuma S. Gallstone disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:1075–1083.
Alberti P, Gallucci D, Rivadossi F, et al. Primary stones of the common bile duct. Minerva Chir. 1993;48:73–77.
Thistle JL. Pathophysiology of bile duct stones. World J Surg. 1998;22:1114–1118.

Auteurs

Niv Pencovich (N)

Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer.

Moshe Lachiani (M)

Department of Surgery B, Division of Surgery.

Adam Phillips (A)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Erwin Santo (E)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Ido Nachmany (I)

Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH