Estimation of age at onset of linear enamel hypoplasia. New calculation tool, description and comparison of current methods.
enamel hypoplasia
mathematical modeling
physiological stress
Journal
Journal of anatomy
ISSN: 1469-7580
Titre abrégé: J Anat
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0137162
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
revised:
05
05
2021
received:
26
03
2021
accepted:
10
05
2021
pubmed:
4
6
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
3
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Enamel Hypoplasia (EH) is known to be a useful indicator for wide range of detrimental factors in early childhood in past populations, such as nutritional disturbances, mechanical trauma, disease, metabolic, and/or genetic disorders. EH may be divided into three categories: pits, grooves, and lines, where the last two are referred to as "Linear Enamel Hypoplasia" (LEH). The regularity of enamel formation allows retrospective determination of the age of LEH formation. The current article reviews and compares the best-known methods used to estimate age at LEH formation and provides a new computational tool. Growth curves for canines and incisors were developed based on tooth growth tables by previous authors. Optimal models were selected using the Akaike Information Criterion. A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet was created to calculate age at LEH formation using the most common methods. All method results were compared with an archaeological sample (44 teeth of 18 individuals from an early modern cemetery from Wrocław, Poland) and a theoretical model. The results of the methods were compared pairwise with Bland-Altman plots. The current article provides a quick and easy-to-use tool for analyzing LEH chronology and comparing the results of different methods. As shown by the Bland-Altman plots, most methods provide approximately consistent results for LEHs formed at around 2-3 years of age. However, LEHs formed particularly early or late are more prone to discrepancies between different methods. Comparison of the age at LEH formation obtained by different methods should be done carefully - and the new LEH calculation tool with optimized equations provided in this publication can facilitate this process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34081785
doi: 10.1111/joa.13462
pmc: PMC8450483
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
920-931Informations de copyright
© 2021 Anatomical Society.
Références
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012 Nov;149(3):468-82
pubmed: 23041791
Anthropol Anz. 2014;71(4):391-402
pubmed: 25775091
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000 Sep;113(1):135-9
pubmed: 10954627
J Hum Evol. 2006 Mar;50(3):329-46
pubmed: 16300817
Nutrition. 2001 May;17(5):426-7
pubmed: 11377143
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008 Mar;135(3):348-61
pubmed: 18161846
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008 Mar;135(3):362-5
pubmed: 18046776
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995 Mar;96(3):301-14
pubmed: 7785727
J Anat. 2021 Oct;239(4):920-931
pubmed: 34081785
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Aug;154(4):525-34
pubmed: 24862036
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):388-90
pubmed: 19639077
Biometrics. 2001 Mar;57(1):120-5
pubmed: 11252586
Am J Hum Biol. 2001 Nov-Dec;13(6):788-807
pubmed: 11748818
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2019 Mar;168(3):510-520
pubmed: 30586150
Homo. 2014 Aug;65(4):296-310
pubmed: 24767821
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989 May;79(1):25-41
pubmed: 2665513
Arch Oral Biol. 2002 Jan;47(1):29-39
pubmed: 11743929
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004 Mar;123(3):199-215
pubmed: 14968419
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1978 Feb;48(2):185-92
pubmed: 637120
Int Dent J. 1982 Jun;32(2):123-34
pubmed: 6749692
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994 Mar;93(3):299-306
pubmed: 8042693
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990 Jun;82(2):231-3
pubmed: 2360616
Hum Biol. 1980 Sep;52(3):515-28
pubmed: 7005071