Assessing the impact of management on sea anglers in the UK using choice experiments.

Choice experiment Fisheries management Recreational angling Stated preference

Journal

Journal of environmental management
ISSN: 1095-8630
Titre abrégé: J Environ Manage
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401664

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 09 12 2020
revised: 04 05 2021
accepted: 17 05 2021
pubmed: 4 6 2021
medline: 22 7 2021
entrez: 3 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recreational sea angling is a popular activity generating significant socio-economic benefits but can impact on fish stocks. The motivations of recreational sea anglers go beyond catch, with a diverse range of motivations relating to physical health and well-being. Heterogenous motives and the popularity of catch and release practices mean that applying commercial fisheries management goals (maximum sustainable yield) to recreational fisheries could result in reduced participation, increased non-compliance, and a subsequent loss of both market and non-market values generated through recreational angling activities. Hence, assessment of sea angler preferences for management is important for the development of appropriate management strategies. In this study, a choice experiment was conducted to assess sea anglers' preferences for changes in UK sea angling management measures. Stated preferences for catching, keeping, and releasing fish due to bag limits and minimum-landing sizes were assessed. Willingness to pay (WTP) estimates for marginal changes of catching the first sea bass on a trip were between £11 and £31 depending on whether the fish could be kept or released and between £11 and £28 for cod, respectively. WTP was much higher for fish caught and kept than caught and released suggesting that consumption of fish was an important motivation. Minimum size was the most considered choice attribute for respondents, while cost was less commonly considered. The implications of the findings are discussed in the context of future management of recreational fisheries.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34082347
pii: S0301-4797(21)00893-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112831
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

112831

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Barnaby Andrews (B)

Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK; Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Rd, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, UK. Electronic address: dr.barnabyandrews@gmail.com.

Silvia Ferrini (S)

Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.

Angela Muench (A)

Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Rd, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, UK; Collaborative Centre for Sustainable Use of the Seas (CCSUS), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.

Adam Brown (A)

Substance, Canada House, Chepstow Street, Manchester, M1 5FW, UK.

Kieran Hyder (K)

Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Rd, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, UK; Collaborative Centre for Sustainable Use of the Seas (CCSUS), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH