Primary care-based smoking cessation treatment and subsequent healthcare service utilisation: a matched cohort study of smokers using linked administrative healthcare data.
cessation
health services
primary health care
Journal
Tobacco control
ISSN: 1468-3318
Titre abrégé: Tob Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9209612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
received:
29
01
2021
revised:
10
04
2021
accepted:
27
04
2021
pubmed:
5
6
2021
medline:
20
12
2022
entrez:
4
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
No research has assessed the individual-level impact of smoking cessation treatment delivered within a general primary care patient population on multiple forms of subsequent healthcare service use. We aimed to compare the rate of outpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalisations during a 5-year follow-up period among smokers who had and had not accessed a smoking cessation treatment programme. The study was a retrospective matched cohort study using linked demographic and administrative healthcare databases in Ontario, Canada. 9951 patients who accessed smoking cessation services between July 2011 and December 2012 were matched to a smoker who did not access services, obtained from the Canadian Community Health Survey, using a combination of hard matching and propensity score matching. Outcomes were rates of healthcare service use from index date (programme enrolment or survey response) to March 2017. After controlling for potential confounders, patients in the overall treatment cohort had modestly greater rates of the outcomes: outpatient visits (rate ratio (RR) 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.14), ED visits (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.13) and hospitalisations (RR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.18). Effect modification of the association between smoking cessation treatment and healthcare service use by prevalent comorbidity was found for outpatient visits (p=0.006), and hospitalisations (p=0.050), but not ED visits. Patients who enrolled in smoking cessation treatment offered through primary care clinics in Ontario displayed a modest but significantly greater rate of outpatient visits, ED visits and hospitalisations over a 5-year follow-up period.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
No research has assessed the individual-level impact of smoking cessation treatment delivered within a general primary care patient population on multiple forms of subsequent healthcare service use.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to compare the rate of outpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalisations during a 5-year follow-up period among smokers who had and had not accessed a smoking cessation treatment programme.
METHODS
The study was a retrospective matched cohort study using linked demographic and administrative healthcare databases in Ontario, Canada. 9951 patients who accessed smoking cessation services between July 2011 and December 2012 were matched to a smoker who did not access services, obtained from the Canadian Community Health Survey, using a combination of hard matching and propensity score matching. Outcomes were rates of healthcare service use from index date (programme enrolment or survey response) to March 2017.
RESULTS
After controlling for potential confounders, patients in the overall treatment cohort had modestly greater rates of the outcomes: outpatient visits (rate ratio (RR) 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.14), ED visits (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.13) and hospitalisations (RR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.18). Effect modification of the association between smoking cessation treatment and healthcare service use by prevalent comorbidity was found for outpatient visits (p=0.006), and hospitalisations (p=0.050), but not ED visits.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients who enrolled in smoking cessation treatment offered through primary care clinics in Ontario displayed a modest but significantly greater rate of outpatient visits, ED visits and hospitalisations over a 5-year follow-up period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34083493
pii: tobaccocontrol-2021-056522
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056522
pmc: PMC9763184
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
72-79Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: DB reports receiving grant funding in the past 5 years from Pfizer, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (CCSRI). PS reports receiving funding in the past 3 years from CCSRI, CIHR, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Health Canada, Medical Psychiatry Alliance, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation and the Public Health Agency of Canada. PS also reports funding from the following commercial organisations: Patient-Centred Outcome Research Institute and Pfizer. PS has received honoraria in the past 3 years from University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Battle River Treaty 6 Healthcare, Lung Association of Nova Scotia, Exchange Summit, Toronto Public Health, Ontario Association of Public Health Dentistry and ECHO. PS has been retained as an expert witness by the Ontario and New Brunswick provincial governments in litigation against the tobacco industry. PS was a member and co-chaired the Ministry of Health’s Ontario Smoke Free Strategy cessation subcommittee. Through an open tender process, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis and Pfizer are vendors of record for providing free/discounted smoking cessation pharmacotherapy for research studies in which PS and/or LZ are principal or co-investigator. CdO reports receiving grant funding in the past 5 years from CIHR, University of Toronto, Medical Research Council, National Institutes of Health, CAMH, Alberta Innovates, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control and Ontario Mental Health Foundation. PK reports receiving grant funding in the past 5 years from CIHR and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. LR reports receiving grant funding in the past 5 years from CIHR, New Frontiers in Research Fund, Canada Research Chairs and the Connaught Foundation. LZ reports receiving grant funding in the past 5 years from Pfizer, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Health Canada, CIHR and CCSRI. LZ also received honoraria and travel funds from Pfizer and University of Ottawa Heart Institute. RS reports receiving funding in the past 5 years from CIHR, Terry Fox Research Institute, Garron Family Cancer Centre and Sick Kids Foundation, Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Sunnybrook Foundation, Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, PSI Foundation, C17 Research Network, Cancer Care Ontario, Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation, Sunnybrook AFP Innovation Fund, CCSRI, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and the Ontario Medical Association. PS, LZ, PK, DB and CdO have been employed by CAMH in the past 36 months; results of this study may impact whether CAMH continues to receive funding from the Ministry of Health to administer the STOP programme. No other author has competing interests to declare.
Références
Tob Use Insights. 2015 Jul 14;8:1-35
pubmed: 26242225
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 May 24;23(6):976-982
pubmed: 33085765
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 30;7(11):
pubmed: 29848493
Health Rep. 2002;13(3):9-14
pubmed: 12743956
Comput Biol Med. 1992 Sep;22(5):351-61
pubmed: 1424580
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 16;13(8):e1002082
pubmed: 27529741
J Ambul Care Manage. 2005 Apr-Jun;28(2):141-56
pubmed: 15923947
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Apr;12(4):365-73
pubmed: 20156886
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424
pubmed: 21818162
Health Rep. 2009 Dec;20(4):75-83
pubmed: 20108608
Healthc Q. 2011;14(3):23-7
pubmed: 21841373
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec 10;12:452
pubmed: 23217125
Chest. 2007 Feb;131(2):446-52
pubmed: 17296646
PLoS Med. 2010 Dec 07;7(12):e1000375
pubmed: 21170313
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 24;3:CD008286
pubmed: 27009521
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1557-65
pubmed: 23948001
Tob Control. 2017 May;26(3):293-299
pubmed: 27225016
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Sep 11;155(16):1789-95
pubmed: 7654113
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;54(4):387-98
pubmed: 11297888
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;(5):CD009329
pubmed: 23728690
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar 15;187(6):596-601
pubmed: 23328526
Health Rep. 2009 Mar;20(1):53-8
pubmed: 19388369
Addiction. 2013 Nov;108(11):1979-88
pubmed: 23795578
Int J Public Health. 2013 Dec;58(6):913-25
pubmed: 23436022
J Hosp Med. 2017 Nov;12(11):880-885
pubmed: 29091974
Med Care. 2011 Oct;49(10):932-9
pubmed: 21478773
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Mar;6(3):1095-106
pubmed: 19440435
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 31;5:CD000146
pubmed: 29852054
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 06;12(10):e1001885
pubmed: 26440803
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan 1;206:107756
pubmed: 31786396
Lancet. 2006 Jul 29;368(9533):348-9
pubmed: 16876647
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992 Oct;60(5):689-97
pubmed: 1401384
Stat Methods Med Res. 2002 Apr;11(2):141-66
pubmed: 12040694
Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Jun;30(3):616-21; discussion 622-3
pubmed: 11416093
Adv Ther. 2019 Feb;36(2):365-380
pubmed: 30569324
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1885-1906
pubmed: 28390697
Prev Med. 2002 Mar;34(3):334-45
pubmed: 11902850
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Aug;59(8):706-10
pubmed: 16020650
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 10;15(7):e0235709
pubmed: 32650339
Tob Control. 2000 Dec;9(4):389-96
pubmed: 11106708
Med Care. 2018 Apr;56(4):358-363
pubmed: 29401186
Hypertension. 2015 Sep;66(3):502-8
pubmed: 26169049