Awake spine surgery: An eye-opening movement.

Conscious sedation Enhanced recovery after surgery Minimally invasive Neural feedback Neuroanesthesia

Journal

Surgical neurology international
ISSN: 2229-5097
Titre abrégé: Surg Neurol Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101535836

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 12 02 2021
accepted: 24 03 2021
entrez: 4 6 2021
pubmed: 5 6 2021
medline: 5 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Awake surgery is performed in multiple surgical specialties, but historically, awake surgery in the field of neurosurgery was limited to craniotomies. Over the past two decades, spinal surgeons have pushed for techniques that only require regional anesthesia as they may provide reduced financial burdens on patients, faster recovery times, and better outcomes. The list of awake spine surgeries that have been found in the literature include: laminectomies/discectomies, anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs), lumbar fusions, and dorsal column (DC) stimulator placement. An extensive review of the published literature was conducted through PubMed database with articles containing the search term "awake spine surgery." No date restrictions were used. The search yielded 293 related articles. Cross-checking of articles was conducted to exclude of duplicate articles. The articles were screened for their full text and English language availability. We finalized those articles pertaining to the topic. Findings have shown that lumbar laminectomies performed with local anesthesia have shown shorter operating time, less postoperative nausea, lower incidence of urinary retention and spinal headache, and shorter hospital stays when compared to those performed under general anesthesia. Lumbar fusions with local anesthesia showed similar outcomes as patients reported better postoperative function and fewer side effects of general anesthesia. DC stimulator placement performed with local anesthesia is advantageous as it allows real time patient feedback for surgeons as they directly test affected nerves. However, spontaneous movement during the placement of DC stimulators is associated with higher failure rates when compared to general anesthesia (29.7% vs. 14.9%). Studies have shown that the use of local anesthesia during ACDFs has no significant differences when compared to general anesthesia, and patient's report better tolerated pain with general anesthesia. The use of awake spine surgery is beneficial for those who cannot undergo general anesthesia. However, it is limited to patients who can tolerate prone positioning with no central airway (i.e., normal BMI with a healthy airway), have no pre-existing mental health conditions (e.g., anxiety), and require a minimally invasive procedure with a short operating time. Future studies should focus on long-term efficacies of these procedures that provide further insight on the indications and limitations of awake spine surgery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Awake surgery is performed in multiple surgical specialties, but historically, awake surgery in the field of neurosurgery was limited to craniotomies. Over the past two decades, spinal surgeons have pushed for techniques that only require regional anesthesia as they may provide reduced financial burdens on patients, faster recovery times, and better outcomes. The list of awake spine surgeries that have been found in the literature include: laminectomies/discectomies, anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs), lumbar fusions, and dorsal column (DC) stimulator placement.
METHODS METHODS
An extensive review of the published literature was conducted through PubMed database with articles containing the search term "awake spine surgery." No date restrictions were used.
RESULTS RESULTS
The search yielded 293 related articles. Cross-checking of articles was conducted to exclude of duplicate articles. The articles were screened for their full text and English language availability. We finalized those articles pertaining to the topic. Findings have shown that lumbar laminectomies performed with local anesthesia have shown shorter operating time, less postoperative nausea, lower incidence of urinary retention and spinal headache, and shorter hospital stays when compared to those performed under general anesthesia. Lumbar fusions with local anesthesia showed similar outcomes as patients reported better postoperative function and fewer side effects of general anesthesia. DC stimulator placement performed with local anesthesia is advantageous as it allows real time patient feedback for surgeons as they directly test affected nerves. However, spontaneous movement during the placement of DC stimulators is associated with higher failure rates when compared to general anesthesia (29.7% vs. 14.9%). Studies have shown that the use of local anesthesia during ACDFs has no significant differences when compared to general anesthesia, and patient's report better tolerated pain with general anesthesia.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The use of awake spine surgery is beneficial for those who cannot undergo general anesthesia. However, it is limited to patients who can tolerate prone positioning with no central airway (i.e., normal BMI with a healthy airway), have no pre-existing mental health conditions (e.g., anxiety), and require a minimally invasive procedure with a short operating time. Future studies should focus on long-term efficacies of these procedures that provide further insight on the indications and limitations of awake spine surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34084649
doi: 10.25259/SNI_153_2021
pii: 10.25259/SNI_153_2021
pmc: PMC8168649
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

222

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2021 Surgical Neurology International.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Jan-Mar;12(1):4-9
pubmed: 26917912
Turk Neurosurg. 2015;25(5):685-9
pubmed: 26442531
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):713-721
pubmed: 33046538
Global Spine J. 2019 Jun;9(4):368-374
pubmed: 31218193
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Aug 15;22(16):1892-6; discussion 1896-7
pubmed: 9280026
Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:93
pubmed: 21748045
J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Jan;2(1):17-22
pubmed: 15658121
Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Dec;23(4):307-310
pubmed: 29202993
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019 Apr 1;16(4):519
pubmed: 30032276
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2002 Mar;16(1):81-93
pubmed: 12491545
J Clin Anesth. 1998 Dec;10(8):666-9
pubmed: 9873969
Anaesthesist. 2013 Aug;62(8):632-8
pubmed: 23925461
J Clin Anesth. 2011 Nov;23(7):521-6
pubmed: 22050794
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Aug;22(8):1309-13
pubmed: 26067543
Anesth Analg. 1996 Sep;83(3):559-64
pubmed: 8780281
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Feb;40(2):E13
pubmed: 26828882
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 15;31(8):897-902
pubmed: 16622378
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e6119
pubmed: 28207536
Discoveries (Craiova). 2020 Jun 29;8(2):e111
pubmed: 32637571
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(Suppl 5):S167
pubmed: 31624733
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2014;48(3):167-73
pubmed: 24981180
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 15;29(22):2542-7
pubmed: 15543071
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Apr;119:39-43
pubmed: 24635923
Anesth Analg. 1997 May;84(5):1165-6
pubmed: 9141957
Surg Neurol. 2009 Jan;71(1):60-5; discussion 65
pubmed: 19084683
J Perioper Pract. 2009 Jun;19(6):168-73
pubmed: 19591320
World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:266-71
pubmed: 26875652
J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Dec;17(12):1537-40
pubmed: 20832324
J Spinal Disord. 1988;1(2):139-43
pubmed: 2980070
J Res Med Sci. 2011 Apr;16(4):524-9
pubmed: 22091269
Altern Ther Health Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):16-23
pubmed: 22314630
Global Spine J. 2017 Dec;7(8):727-734
pubmed: 29238635
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Apr;20(7-8):960-8
pubmed: 21320217
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Mar;23(2):229-236
pubmed: 29248305
Surg Today. 2015 Jan;45(1):1-7
pubmed: 25274467
Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(3):380-4
pubmed: 24848178
J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S108-S114
pubmed: 31380499
Oncol Lett. 2017 Mar;13(3):1637-1640
pubmed: 28454302
Neuromodulation. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):130-4; discussion 134-5
pubmed: 21992199
Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2001 Mar;19(1):43-55
pubmed: 11244919
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 1;40(1):E36-42
pubmed: 25271488
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2003 Jul;15(3):185-92
pubmed: 12826965
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Mar;22(3):539-43
pubmed: 25510535
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2007 Spring;16(1):5-11
pubmed: 17371640
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Sep-Oct;11(5):749-752
pubmed: 32904215
Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Apr 16;5(Suppl 3):S62-5
pubmed: 24843813
Anaesthesia. 2017 Mar;72(3):391-401
pubmed: 27770448
Br J Neurosurg. 1999 Dec;13(6):598-600
pubmed: 10715731
Local Reg Anesth. 2017 Oct 10;10:91-98
pubmed: 29066932
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E16
pubmed: 30933917

Auteurs

Brian Fiani (B)

Department of Neurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, California, United States.

Taylor Reardon (T)

Kentucky College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of Pikeville, Pikeville, Kentucky, United States.

Jacob Selvage (J)

Kentucky College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of Pikeville, Pikeville, Kentucky, United States.

Alden Dahan (A)

School of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.

Mohamed H El-Farra (MH)

School of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.

Philine Endres (P)

School of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.

Taha Taka (T)

School of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.

Yasmine Suliman (Y)

School of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.

Alexander Rose (A)

School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.

Classifications MeSH