Integration of Dual Stress Transcriptomes and Major QTLs from a Pair of Genotypes Contrasting for Drought and Chronic Nitrogen Starvation Identifies Key Stress Responsive Genes in Rice.
Drought stress
Nitrogen stress
Nitrogen use efficiency
QTLs under nitrogen stress
RNA-seq
Rice
Journal
Rice (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1939-8425
Titre abrégé: Rice (N Y)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101503136
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jun 2021
05 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
03
12
2020
accepted:
05
05
2021
entrez:
5
6
2021
pubmed:
6
6
2021
medline:
6
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We report here the genome-wide changes resulting from low N (N-W+), low water (N+W-)) and dual stresses (N-W-) in root and shoot tissues of two rice genotypes, namely, IR 64 (IR64) and Nagina 22 (N22), and their association with the QTLs for nitrogen use efficiency. For all the root parameters, except for root length under N-W+, N22 performed better than IR64. Chlorophyll a, b and carotenoid content were higher in IR64 under N+W+ treatment and N-W+ and N+W- stresses; however, under dual stress, N22 had higher chlorophyll b content. While nitrite reductase, glutamate synthase (GS) and citrate synthase assays showed better specific activity in IR64, glutamate dehydrogenase showed better specific activity in N22 under dual stress (N-W-); the other N and C assimilating enzymes showed similar but low specific activities in both the genotypes. A total of 8926 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified compared to optimal (N+W+) condition from across all treatments. While 1174, 698 and 903 DEGs in IR64 roots and 1197, 187 and 781 in N22 roots were identified, nearly double the number of DEGs were found in the shoot tissues; 3357, 1006 and 4005 in IR64 and 4004, 990 and 2143 in N22, under N-W+, N+W- and N-W- treatments, respectively. IR64 and N22 showed differential expression in 15 and 11 N-transporter genes respectively, under one or more stress treatments, out of which four showed differential expression also in N+W- condition. The negative regulators of N- stress, e.g., NIGT1, OsACTPK1 and OsBT were downregulated in IR64 while in N22, OsBT was not downregulated. Overall, N22 performed better under dual stress conditions owing to its better root architecture, chlorophyll and porphyrin synthesis and oxidative stress management. We identified 12 QTLs for seed and straw N content using 253 recombinant inbred lines derived from IR64 and N22 and a 5K SNP array. The QTL hotspot region on chromosome 6 comprised of 61 genes, of which, five were DEGs encoding for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase, serine threonine kinase, anthocyanidin 3-O-glucosyltransferase, and nitrate induced proteins. The DEGs, QTLs and candidate genes reported in this study can serve as a major resource for both rice improvement and functional biology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34089405
doi: 10.1186/s12284-021-00487-8
pii: 10.1186/s12284-021-00487-8
pmc: PMC8179884
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
49Références
BMC Genet. 2011 Oct 18;12:89
pubmed: 22008150
DNA Res. 2015 Apr;22(2):133-45
pubmed: 25627243
Plant Physiol. 1979 Sep;64(3):499-501
pubmed: 16660997
Cell. 1993 Mar 12;72(5):705-13
pubmed: 8453665
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 13;5:14799
pubmed: 26458744
Genes (Basel). 2018 Apr 11;9(4):
pubmed: 29641510
Ann Bot. 2010 Jun;105(7):1141-57
pubmed: 20299346
Plant Physiol. 2018 Oct;178(2):612-625
pubmed: 30139795
J Biosci. 2012 Sep;37(4):731-47
pubmed: 22922198
BMC Evol Biol. 2003 Jul 23;3:17
pubmed: 12877745
Nature. 2006 Aug 10;442(7103):705-8
pubmed: 16900200
J Plant Res. 2011 Jul;124(4):489-99
pubmed: 21380629
Science. 2020 Feb 7;367(6478):
pubmed: 32029600
Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun;132(2):926-35
pubmed: 12805621
J Plant Physiol. 2011 May 15;168(8):816-23
pubmed: 21316797
Plant Physiol. 2014 May;165(1):277-89
pubmed: 24676855
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Sep 30;18(1):432
pubmed: 28964253
Plant Biotechnol J. 2019 Jul;17(7):1289-1301
pubmed: 30565833
J Exp Bot. 2020 Jul 25;71(15):4452-4468
pubmed: 32026944
Rice (N Y). 2020 Jun 8;13(1):35
pubmed: 32514747
BMC Genomics. 2016 Oct 4;17(1):774
pubmed: 27716126
Plant J. 2015 Feb;81(3):367-76
pubmed: 25439309
Plant Cell Rep. 2013 Feb;32(2):183-93
pubmed: 23070303
Plant Biotechnol J. 2008 Sep;6(7):722-32
pubmed: 18510577
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011 Jun;14(3):290-5
pubmed: 21377404
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 15;8(1):9200
pubmed: 29907833
J Exp Bot. 2019 Sep 24;70(18):4963-4974
pubmed: 31089708
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Sep 04;9:1179
pubmed: 30233603
Plant Cell Rep. 2010 May;29(5):419-36
pubmed: 20204373
Rice (N Y). 2017 Dec;10(1):28
pubmed: 28584974
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 28;10:1488
pubmed: 31850010
Plant Cell Rep. 2005 Aug;24(6):366-73
pubmed: 15789205
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 30;104(5):1708-13
pubmed: 17237218
Bioinformatics. 2003 May 1;19(7):889-90
pubmed: 12724300
Nature. 2014 Mar 6;507(7490):73-7
pubmed: 24572362
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Aug 10;7:1206
pubmed: 27559341
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Apr 18;9:444
pubmed: 29720986
Plant J. 2018 Mar;93(6):992-1006
pubmed: 29356222
Plant Sci. 2019 Jul;284:57-66
pubmed: 31084879
Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2014;310:1-37
pubmed: 24725423
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 30;7:981
pubmed: 27446197
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):12
pubmed: 30621596
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Aug 22;9:1143
pubmed: 30186291
Plant Physiol. 2020 Jul;183(3):998-1010
pubmed: 32398320
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015 Nov;177(6):1299-312
pubmed: 26315134
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Aug;14(8):1705-15
pubmed: 26826052
Plant Cell Physiol. 2015 Aug;56(8):1588-97
pubmed: 25957355
Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Mar;60(5):617-31
pubmed: 16649102
Sci China Life Sci. 2018 Sep;61(9):1130-1131
pubmed: 30136055
FEBS J. 2013 Apr;280(7):1717-30
pubmed: 23399101
Plant Mol Biol. 2019 Mar;99(4-5):477-497
pubmed: 30721380
Int J Genomics. 2020 Sep 17;2020:7582612
pubmed: 33015150
Trends Plant Sci. 2014 Jan;19(1):5-9
pubmed: 24055139
Plant Sci. 2013 Aug;209:32-45
pubmed: 23759101
J Proteome Res. 2010 Jul 2;9(7):3443-64
pubmed: 20433195
Gene. 2016 Jan 15;576(1 Pt 3):441-50
pubmed: 26519999
Mol Genet Genomics. 2003 Jun;269(3):331-9
pubmed: 12684879
N Biotechnol. 2010 Nov 30;27(5):565-72
pubmed: 20708721
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Feb 21;10:197
pubmed: 30846998
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Nov 5;10(11):4215-4226
pubmed: 32963085
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Mar 30;8:434
pubmed: 28424717
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 Aug;129:130-140
pubmed: 29870864
Plant Physiol. 1998 May;117(1):283-92
pubmed: 9576798
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Mar 09;9:306
pubmed: 29593764
Plant Physiol. 2015 Apr;167(4):1659-70
pubmed: 25713337
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 18;101(20):7833-8
pubmed: 15136740
Plant Cell Environ. 2014 Apr;37(4):1022-36
pubmed: 24182190
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jul 29;17(8):
pubmed: 27483251
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012;63:153-82
pubmed: 22224450