Analytical survey of tattoo inks-A chemical and legal perspective with focus on sensitizing substances.


Journal

Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
revised: 28 05 2021
received: 15 03 2021
accepted: 02 06 2021
pubmed: 6 6 2021
medline: 17 12 2021
entrez: 5 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tattoo inks have been reported to elicit allergic contact dermatitis. To investigate the labels and the contents of metals and pigments in tattoo inks, considering restrictions within the European Union. Seventy-three tattoo inks currently available on the market, either bought or donated (already used), were investigated for trace metals and pigments by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight tandem mass spectrometry. Ninety-three percent of the bought tattoo inks violated European, legal requirements on labeling. Fifty percent of the tattoo inks declared at least one pigment ingredient incorrectly. Sixty-one percent of the inks contained pigments of concern, especially red inks. Iron, aluminium, titanium, and copper (most in green/blue inks) were the main metals detected in the inks. The level of metal impurities exceeded current restriction limits in only a few cases. Total chromium (0.35-139 μg/g) and nickel (0.1-41 μg/g) were found in almost all samples. The levels of iron, chromium, manganese, cobalt, nickel, zinc, lead, and arsenic were found to covary significantly. To prevent contact allergy and toxic reactions among users it is important for tattoo ink manufacturers to follow the regulations and decrease nickel and chromium impurities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Tattoo inks have been reported to elicit allergic contact dermatitis.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To investigate the labels and the contents of metals and pigments in tattoo inks, considering restrictions within the European Union.
METHODS METHODS
Seventy-three tattoo inks currently available on the market, either bought or donated (already used), were investigated for trace metals and pigments by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight tandem mass spectrometry.
RESULTS RESULTS
Ninety-three percent of the bought tattoo inks violated European, legal requirements on labeling. Fifty percent of the tattoo inks declared at least one pigment ingredient incorrectly. Sixty-one percent of the inks contained pigments of concern, especially red inks. Iron, aluminium, titanium, and copper (most in green/blue inks) were the main metals detected in the inks. The level of metal impurities exceeded current restriction limits in only a few cases. Total chromium (0.35-139 μg/g) and nickel (0.1-41 μg/g) were found in almost all samples. The levels of iron, chromium, manganese, cobalt, nickel, zinc, lead, and arsenic were found to covary significantly.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
To prevent contact allergy and toxic reactions among users it is important for tattoo ink manufacturers to follow the regulations and decrease nickel and chromium impurities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34089526
doi: 10.1111/cod.13913
doi:

Substances chimiques

Coloring Agents 0
Metals 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

340-353

Subventions

Organisme : Canada Research Chairs Program
ID : 950 - 233099
Organisme : Chinese Scholarship Council, Beijing, China
ID : 201700260221
Organisme : Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
ID : FFL18-0173
Organisme : Vinnova, Sweden
ID : 2017-03532
Organisme : Wolfe-Western fellowship, Canada
ID : 2020

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

European Commission. Resolution ResAP (2008) 1 on requirements and criteria for the safety of tattoos and permanent make-up (superseding Resolution ResAP (2003) 2 on tattoos and permanent make-up). https://rm.coe.int/16805d3dc4. Accessed May 27, 2021.
Krutak L. The cultural heritage of tattooing: a brief history. In: Serup J, Kluger N, Bäumler W, eds. Tattooed Skin and Health, Current Problems in Dermatology. Vol 48. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2015:1-5.
Giulbudagian M, Schreiver I, Singh AV, Laux P, Luch A. Safety of tattoos and permanent make-up: a regulatory view. Arch Toxicol. 2020;94(2):357-369.
Piccinini P, Pakalin S, Contor L, Bianchi I, Senaldi C. JRC science for policy report: safety of tattoos and permanent make-up final. European commision technical report 2016. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/45616482.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2021.
Swedish Chemicals Agency. Farliga ämnen i tatueringsfärger - Utredning av tillsynsansvar samt behov av ytterligare reglering. https://www.kemi.se/download/18.6df1d3df171c243fb23a990f/1591454113466/rapport-3-10-tatueringsfarg.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2021.
Renzoni A, Pirrea A, Novello F, et al. The tattooed population in Italy: a national survey on demography, characteristics and perception of health risks. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2018;54(2):126-136.
Schreiver I, Hesse B, Seim C, et al. Distribution of nickel and chromium containing particles from tattoo needle wear in humans and its possible impact on allergic reactions. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2019;16(1):1-10.
de Cuyper C, Lodewick E, Schreiver I, et al. Are metals involved in tattoo-related hypersensitivity reactions? A case report. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77(6):397-405.
Serup J, Hutton Carlsen K, Dommershausen N, et al. Identification of pigments related to allergic tattoo reactions in 104 human skin biopsies. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82(2):73-82.
Klügl I, Hiller K-A, Landthaler M, Bäumler W. Incidence of health problems associated with tattooed skin: a nation-wide survey in German-speaking countries. Dermatology. 2010;221(1):43-50.
Kluger N, Koljonen V. Tattoos, inks, and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):e161-e168.
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing-recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73(4):195-221.
Serup J, Hutton CK. Patch test study of 90 patients with tattoo reactions: negative outcome of allergy patch test to baseline batteries and culprit inks suggests allergen (s) are generated in the skin through haptenization. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;71(5):255-263.
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) Committee for Socio-economic Analysis (SEAC) - Opinion on an Annex XV dossier proposing restrictions on substances used in tattoo inks and permanent make-up. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/dc3d6ea4-df3f-f53d-eff0-540ff3a5b1a0. Accessed May 27, 2021.
Bocca B, Senofonte O, Petrucci F. Hexavalent chromium in tattoo inks: dermal exposure and systemic risk. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;79(4):218-225.
Manso M, Pessanha S, Guerra M, et al. Assessment of toxic metals and hazardous substances in tattoo inks using Sy-XRF, AAS, and Raman spectroscopy. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019;187(2):596-601.
European Commission. Resolution ResAP (2003) 2 on tattoos and permanent make-up. https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805df8d3. Accessed May 27, 2021.
Laux P, Luch A. The European landscape of national regulations of tattoo inks and businesses. In: Serup J, Kluger N, Bäumler W, eds. Tattooed Skin and Health, Current Problems in Dermatology. Vol 48. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2015:196-200.
European Commission. Commission regulation (EU) 2020/2081 of 14 December 2020 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards substances in tattoo inks or permanent make-up. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32020R2081&qid=1609761602759. Accessed May 27, 2021.
Forte G, Petrucci F, Cristaudo A, Bocca B. Market survey on toxic metals contained in tattoo inks. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407(23):5997-6002.
Niederer M, Hauri U, Kroll L, Hohl C. Identification of organic pigments in tattoo inks and permanent make-ups using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. F1000Res. 2018;6:2034.
Goss-Sampson M. Statistical analysis in JASP: A guide for students. https://static.jasp-stats.org/Statistical%20Analysis%20in%20JASP%20-%20A%20Students%20Guide%20v2.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2021.
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Substance Information. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.018.645. Accessed May 27, 2021.
European Commission. Regulation (EC) no. 1223/2009 of the European parliament and of the council of 30 november 2009 on cosmetic products. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R1223-20160812&from=EN. Accessed May 27, 2021.
Prior G. Tattoo inks: legislation, pigments, metals and chemical analysis. Serup J, Kluger N, Bäumler W. Tattooed Skin and Health, Current Problems in Dermatology. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2015;48:152-157.
Battistini B, Petrucci F, De Angelis I, Failla CM, Bocca B. Quantitative analysis of metals and metal-based nano- and submicron-particles in tattoo inks. Chemosphere. 2020;245(Apr):125667.
European Commission. Regulation (EC) no. 1333/2008 of the European parliament and of the council of 16 december 2008 on food additives. https://www.fsai.ie/uploadedFiles/Consol_Reg1333_2008.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2021.
Bircher AJ. Metal allergy: other metals. In: Allergy M, Chen JK, Thyssen JP, eds. Springer; 2018:467-479.
Basketter DA, Angelini G, Ingber A, Kern PS, Menné T. Nickel, chromium and cobalt in consumer products: revisiting safe levels in the new millennium. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;49(1):1-7.
Bocca B, Pino A, Alimonti A, Forte G. Toxic metals contained in cosmetics: a status report. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014;68(3):447-467.
Bocca B, Forte G. The epidemiology of contact allergy to metals in the general population: prevalence and new evidences. Open Chem Biomed Methods J. 2009;2:26-34.
Berrie BH, Lomax SQ. Azo pigments: their history, synthesis, properties, and use in artists' materials. Stud Hist Art. 1997;57(2):8-33.
Serup J, Sepehri M, Carlsen KH. Classification of tattoo complications in a hospital material of 493 adverse events. Dermatology. 2016;232(6):668-678.
Lerche CM, Heerfordt IM, Serup J, Poulsen T, Wulf HC. Red tattoos, ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer in mice. Exp Dermatol. 2017;26(11):1091-1096.
Shakeel M, Jabeen F, Shabbir S, Asghar MS, Khan MS, Chaudhry AS. Toxicity of nano-titanium dioxide (TiO 2-NP) through various routes of exposure: a review. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2016;172(1):1-36.
Chan E, Cadosch D, Gautschi OP, Sprengel K, Filgueira L. Influence of metal ions on human lymphocytes and the generation of titanium-specific T-lymphocytes. J Appl Biomater Biomed. 2011;9(2):137-143.
Hamann C. Metal allergy: titanium. In: Chen JK, Thyssen JP, eds. Metal Allergy. Springer; 2018:443-466.
Hindsén M. Metal allergy: aluminium. In: Chen JK, Thyssen JP, eds. Metal Allergy. Springer; 2018:333-336.
Willhite CC, Karyakina NA, Yokel RA, et al. Systematic review of potential health risks posed by pharmaceutical, occupational and consumer exposures to metallic and nanoscale aluminum, aluminum oxides, aluminum hydroxide and its soluble salts. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014;44(sup4):1-80.
Schmitz I, Prymak O, Epple M, Ernert C, Tannapfel A. Squamous cell carcinoma in association with a red tattoo. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016;14(6):604-609.
Oskarsson A. Barium. In: Nordberg GF, Fowler BA, Nordberg M, eds. Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals. Elsevier; 2015:625-634.
Ghose A, Sayeed AA, Hossain A, Rahman R, Faiz A, Haque G. Mass barium carbonate poisoning with fatal outcome, lessons learned: a case series. Cases J. 2009;2(1):1-4.
Johnson CH, VanTassell VJ. Acute barium poisoning with respiratory failure and rhabdomyolysis. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20(10):1138-1142.
Dirks M. Making innovative tattoo ink products with improved safety: possible and impossible ingredients in practical usage. In: Serup J, Kluger N, Bäumler W, eds. Tattooed Skin and Health, Current Problems in Dermatology. Vol 48. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2015:118-127.

Auteurs

Xuying Wang (X)

Division of Surface and Corrosion Science, Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Leila Josefsson (L)

Division of Applied Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Silvia Meschnark (S)

Institute of Chemistry, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Marie-Louise Lind (ML)

Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden.

Åsa Emmer (Å)

Division of Applied Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Walter Goessler (W)

Institute of Chemistry, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Yolanda S Hedberg (YS)

Division of Surface and Corrosion Science, Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Lawson Health Research Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH