Development of a simple screening tool based on the 5-question geriatric locomotive function scale for locomotive syndrome.
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
ISSN: 1436-2023
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9604934
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
31
01
2021
revised:
30
04
2021
accepted:
08
05
2021
pubmed:
7
6
2021
medline:
14
7
2022
entrez:
6
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The optimal cut-off values of the 5-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-5) as a screening tool to identify Locomotive Syndrome (LS) diagnosed with the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) has yet to be fully investigated. This study aimed to construct a simple screening tool, based on the GLFS-5, for the detection of LS-1, LS-2, and LS-3 diagnosed with the GLFS-25. This research was approved by the institutional review board of Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine (No. 2907). A cross-sectional study of 1258 consecutive Japanese volunteers with a mean age of 76.0 ± 6.0 years who consecutively attended a basic health checkup was conducted. We excluded individuals of <65 years of age, individuals with comorbidities, and individuals who did not fully complete the GLFS-25. Subjects with a GLFS-25 total score of 0-6 points, 7-15 points, 16-23 points, and 24-100 points were diagnosed with non-LS, LS-1, LS-2, and LS-3, respectively. A conventional receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to confirm the optimal cut-off values of the GLFS-5 total score and their sensitivity and specificity in the identification of LS-1, LS-2, and LS-3, with a preference for slightly higher sensitivity as the intended use of the tool is primarily for screening purposes. The diagnoses of the 1258 subjects were as follows: non-LS (n = 559), LS-1 (n = 396), LS-2 (n = 134), and LS-3 (n = 169). The mean GLFS-5 was 3.3 ± 3.5 points. The optimal cut-off values of the GLFS-5 total score for discriminating LS-1, LS-2, and LS-3 (as a screening tool) were 2 points (sensitivity 91.7% and specificity 77.8%), 4 points (sensitivity 95.7% and specificity 81.7%), and 6 points (sensitivity 92.9% and specificity 90.0%), respectively. This simple screening tool based on GLFS-5 could help physicians and surgeons to easily and practically predict the severity of LS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The optimal cut-off values of the 5-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-5) as a screening tool to identify Locomotive Syndrome (LS) diagnosed with the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) has yet to be fully investigated. This study aimed to construct a simple screening tool, based on the GLFS-5, for the detection of LS-1, LS-2, and LS-3 diagnosed with the GLFS-25.
METHODS
METHODS
This research was approved by the institutional review board of Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine (No. 2907). A cross-sectional study of 1258 consecutive Japanese volunteers with a mean age of 76.0 ± 6.0 years who consecutively attended a basic health checkup was conducted. We excluded individuals of <65 years of age, individuals with comorbidities, and individuals who did not fully complete the GLFS-25. Subjects with a GLFS-25 total score of 0-6 points, 7-15 points, 16-23 points, and 24-100 points were diagnosed with non-LS, LS-1, LS-2, and LS-3, respectively. A conventional receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to confirm the optimal cut-off values of the GLFS-5 total score and their sensitivity and specificity in the identification of LS-1, LS-2, and LS-3, with a preference for slightly higher sensitivity as the intended use of the tool is primarily for screening purposes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The diagnoses of the 1258 subjects were as follows: non-LS (n = 559), LS-1 (n = 396), LS-2 (n = 134), and LS-3 (n = 169). The mean GLFS-5 was 3.3 ± 3.5 points. The optimal cut-off values of the GLFS-5 total score for discriminating LS-1, LS-2, and LS-3 (as a screening tool) were 2 points (sensitivity 91.7% and specificity 77.8%), 4 points (sensitivity 95.7% and specificity 81.7%), and 6 points (sensitivity 92.9% and specificity 90.0%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This simple screening tool based on GLFS-5 could help physicians and surgeons to easily and practically predict the severity of LS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34090778
pii: S0949-2658(21)00154-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.05.001
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
913-920Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements) or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.