Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Tracheal Intubation with Manual-in-line Stabilization in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery.
Cervical vertebrae
intubating laryngeal mask airway
intubation intratracheal
videolaryngoscope
Journal
Anesthesia, essays and researches
ISSN: 0259-1162
Titre abrégé: Anesth Essays Res
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101578762
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
27
09
2020
revised:
01
10
2020
accepted:
06
10
2020
entrez:
7
6
2021
pubmed:
8
6
2021
medline:
8
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This prospective, randomized study compared CMAC Intubation was performed in all patients after the application of MILS. The primary outcomes included first attempt and overall intubation success rate, intubation time, and apnea time. The secondary objectives were degree of head movement, hemodynamic response, incidence of desaturation, sore throat, and tissue injury. Normality of data was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Quantitative variables were compared using the unpaired CM group had a higher first attempt (96.97%, CMAC group had higher intubation success rate and significantly shorter intubation time. However, ILMA group had a significantly shorter apnea time and significantly lower incidence of head movements.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This prospective, randomized study compared CMAC
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Intubation was performed in all patients after the application of MILS. The primary outcomes included first attempt and overall intubation success rate, intubation time, and apnea time. The secondary objectives were degree of head movement, hemodynamic response, incidence of desaturation, sore throat, and tissue injury.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
METHODS
Normality of data was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Quantitative variables were compared using the unpaired
RESULTS
RESULTS
CM group had a higher first attempt (96.97%,
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
CMAC group had higher intubation success rate and significantly shorter intubation time. However, ILMA group had a significantly shorter apnea time and significantly lower incidence of head movements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34092863
doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_90_20
pii: AER-14-485
pmc: PMC8159048
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
485-491Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2020 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Anesthesiology. 2007 Jul;107(1):53-9
pubmed: 17585215
Surg Neurol Int. 2017 Feb 06;8:19
pubmed: 28217398
Anaesthesia. 2015 Feb;70(2):160-5
pubmed: 25265994
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul;56(6):755-61
pubmed: 22524487
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Jan;25(1):29-36
pubmed: 17662163
Anaesthesia. 2006 Jul;61(7):685-91
pubmed: 16792615
Anesthesiology. 2006 Jun;104(6):1293-318
pubmed: 16732102
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jan-Mar;32(1):59-64
pubmed: 27006543
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Aug;99(2):286-91
pubmed: 17584849
Anesthesiology. 2009 Jun;110(6):1335-40
pubmed: 19461297
Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Aug;76(8):577-83
pubmed: 20661197
Anaesthesia. 2009 Dec;64(12):1337-41
pubmed: 20092511
J Trauma. 2010 Feb;68(2):363-6
pubmed: 19935108
J Trauma. 2010 Oct;69(4):838-42
pubmed: 20179653
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Nov;21(11):907-13
pubmed: 15717709
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;23(1):43-50
pubmed: 26121894
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Aug;99(2):292-6
pubmed: 17584850
Anesthesiology. 2009 Jul;111(1):97-101
pubmed: 19512871
Turk J Med Sci. 2016 Dec 20;46(6):1617-1623
pubmed: 28081306
Anaesthesia. 2005 Feb;60(2):113-7
pubmed: 15644005
Indian J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;56(6):529-34
pubmed: 23325936
Anesth Analg. 2008 Mar;106(3):935-41, table of contents
pubmed: 18292443
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;64(4):269-74
pubmed: 24998112
Anaesthesist. 2019 Feb;68(2):90-96
pubmed: 30627738
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):120-4
pubmed: 18070787