Insect Consciousness.
consciousness
insects
measures of consciousness
methodology
subjective experience
theories of consciousness
Journal
Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5153
Titre abrégé: Front Behav Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
13
01
2021
accepted:
23
04
2021
entrez:
7
6
2021
pubmed:
8
6
2021
medline:
8
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The question of consciousness in other species, not least species very physically different from humans such as insects, is highly challenging for a number of reasons. One reason is that we do not have any available empirical method to answer the question. Another reason is that current theories of consciousness disagree about the relation between physical structure and consciousness, i.e., whether consciousness requires specific, say, neural structures or whether consciousness can be realized in different ways. This article sets out to analyze if and how there could be an empirical and/or a theoretical approach to the topic on the basis of current consciousness research in humans.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34093146
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.653041
pmc: PMC8175961
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
653041Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Overgaard.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 10;8:1719
pubmed: 29066988
Science. 2020 Sep 25;369(6511):1626-1629
pubmed: 32973028
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jul;17(7):450-61
pubmed: 27225071
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Dec;19(4):1079-80; discussion 1081-3
pubmed: 20400336
Philos Phenomenol Res. 2012 Mar;84(2):307-344
pubmed: 22654148
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jun;20(6):405-413
pubmed: 27101880
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Aug;15(8):365-73
pubmed: 21737339
Science. 2017 Feb 24;355(6327):833-836
pubmed: 28232576
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 20;8:625
pubmed: 28473797
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 3;113(18):4900-8
pubmed: 27091981
Lancet. 2011 Dec 17;378(9809):2052-4
pubmed: 22078856
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 19;373(1755):
pubmed: 30061466
Nous. 2022 Mar;56(1):133-153
pubmed: 35321054
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 16;283(1842):
pubmed: 27852803
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Mar;32:33-40
pubmed: 25172329
Behav Brain Sci. 2007 Dec;30(5-6):481-99; discussion 499-548
pubmed: 18366828
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 17;369(1641):20130209
pubmed: 24639581
Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Sep;1(3):224-5
pubmed: 24168340
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):E3813
pubmed: 27357664
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 19;110(47):19155-9
pubmed: 24191024
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Aug;15(8):358-64
pubmed: 21807333
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Mar;17(1):185-202
pubmed: 17383202
Br J Philos Sci. 2010 Sep;61(3):459-484
pubmed: 22654125
Science. 2020 Feb 21;367(6480):910-912
pubmed: 32079771
Scand J Psychol. 2009 Dec;50(6):561-73
pubmed: 19930255
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar;8(2):195-207
pubmed: 26172502
Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 21;21(12):1070-3
pubmed: 21636277
Brain Behav Evol. 1982;21(2-3):60-6
pubmed: 7159828
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):241-242
pubmed: 26880396
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:337-50
pubmed: 25063731
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr 10;:
pubmed: 28397287
J Neurogenet. 2009;23(1-2):92-9
pubmed: 19132597
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Dec;15(4):673-92; discussion 693-9
pubmed: 17049881
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1738-47
pubmed: 24478356
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Dec;15(12):567-75
pubmed: 22078929
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Mar;22(1):212-20
pubmed: 23337441