Validating Indigenous Versions of the South African Personality Inventory.

Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling Sesotho South African Personality Inventory Tshivenda indigenous personality translations

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 28 04 2020
accepted: 19 04 2021
entrez: 7 6 2021
pubmed: 8 6 2021
medline: 8 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Personality assessments are frequently used to make decisions and predictions, creating a demand for assessments that are non-discriminatory. South African legislation requires psychological tests to be scientifically proven to be valid, reliable, fair and non-biased. In response to the necessity for a measure sensitive to indigenous differences, South African and Dutch researchers developed the South African Personality Inventory (SAPI). The SAPI represents a theoretical model of personality that uses an indigenous (emic) and universal (etic) approach to capture South Africa's rich multicultural and multilingual view of personhood. The development of SAPI items and its simultaneous translation from English into all official languages necessitated the investigation of all the translated language versions' psychometric properties. This study used Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling to examine the factor structure and model fit of two indigenous language versions of the SAPI, targeting the Tshivenda and the Southern Sotho languages. To accomplish this objective, Study 1 (

Identifiants

pubmed: 34093294
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.556565
pmc: PMC8172579
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

556565

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Hill, Hlahleni and Legodi.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Sex Res. 2017 Jan;54(1):1-9
pubmed: 26886499
Am Psychol. 2011 Oct;66(7):593-603
pubmed: 21261408
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Sep;466(9):2282-8
pubmed: 18566874
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Sep;113(3):453-465
pubmed: 28594200
West Indian Med J. 2013;62(5):427-30
pubmed: 24756655
Psicothema. 2018 May;30(2):149-158
pubmed: 29694314
J Soc Psychol. 2000 Apr;140(2):210-7
pubmed: 10808644
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110
pubmed: 24313568
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):827-37
pubmed: 25602691
Am J Public Health. 2010 Mar;100(3):563-9
pubmed: 19696376
Dev Psychol. 2013 Jun;49(6):1194-1218
pubmed: 22250996
J Pers. 2012 Aug;80(4):915-48
pubmed: 22091948
Am Psychol. 1997 May;52(5):509-16
pubmed: 9145021

Auteurs

Carin Hill (C)

Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Mpho Hlahleni (M)

Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Lebogang Legodi (L)

Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Classifications MeSH