Professional Quality of Life in intensive care medicine: The 2018 Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine Workforce survey.

Intensive care Pro-QOL burnout wellbeing

Journal

Journal of the Intensive Care Society
ISSN: 1751-1437
Titre abrégé: J Intensive Care Soc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101538668

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
entrez: 7 6 2021
pubmed: 8 6 2021
medline: 8 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Critical care is widely perceived, both within and outside of the speciality, as unremitting and emotionally burdensome. There is a perception of a higher risk to medical staff of burnout than other specialities. Critical care also has considerable emotional and professional rewards. We sought to examine this balance between emotional reward and stress in UK critical care consultants registered with the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine. We conducted a Wellbeing survey of the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine consultant membership utilising the Professional Quality of Life (Pro-QOL) survey tool. The survey was conducted as part of the Annual Workforce Census. In sum, 799 members completed the Pro-QOL survey, making this one of the largest surveys of physician wellbeing in critical care medicine. Data were analysed in accordance with the Pro-QOL manual. The results demonstrate moderate risk for burnout and secondary traumatic stress, but this is balanced by moderate compassion satisfaction. No association was demonstrated between age, sex, or size of critical care unit worked in. Further follow-up of this consultant group is warranted to better understand risk factors for burnout and for future mitigation of these risk factors whilst also enhancing the positive aspects of working as a consultant in critical care medicine.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Critical care is widely perceived, both within and outside of the speciality, as unremitting and emotionally burdensome. There is a perception of a higher risk to medical staff of burnout than other specialities. Critical care also has considerable emotional and professional rewards. We sought to examine this balance between emotional reward and stress in UK critical care consultants registered with the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine.
METHOD METHODS
We conducted a Wellbeing survey of the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine consultant membership utilising the Professional Quality of Life (Pro-QOL) survey tool. The survey was conducted as part of the Annual Workforce Census.
RESULTS RESULTS
In sum, 799 members completed the Pro-QOL survey, making this one of the largest surveys of physician wellbeing in critical care medicine. Data were analysed in accordance with the Pro-QOL manual.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results demonstrate moderate risk for burnout and secondary traumatic stress, but this is balanced by moderate compassion satisfaction. No association was demonstrated between age, sex, or size of critical care unit worked in. Further follow-up of this consultant group is warranted to better understand risk factors for burnout and for future mitigation of these risk factors whilst also enhancing the positive aspects of working as a consultant in critical care medicine.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34093731
doi: 10.1177/1751143719877102
pii: 10.1177_1751143719877102
pmc: PMC8142096
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

299-304

Informations de copyright

© The Intensive Care Society 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 1;175(7):686-92
pubmed: 17234905
Psychol Trauma. 2018 Mar;10(2):225-228
pubmed: 28383935
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov 15;184(10):1140-6
pubmed: 21852543
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):152-6
pubmed: 17943271
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 1;175(7):693-7
pubmed: 17185650
J Pediatr Nurs. 2012 Aug;27(4):357-65
pubmed: 22703683
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 1;175(7):698-704
pubmed: 17110646
Emerg Med J. 2015 Aug;32(8):588-94
pubmed: 25248545
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Jun 15;13:1533-1540
pubmed: 28670122
BJPsych Bull. 2017 Aug;41(4):197-204
pubmed: 28811913
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Dec;89(6):873-81
pubmed: 12453932
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0193478
pubmed: 29489875
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1414-21
pubmed: 27309157
BMC Anesthesiol. 2013 Oct 31;13(1):38
pubmed: 24172172
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;15(6):629-35
pubmed: 25247031
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Feb;41(2):364-5
pubmed: 25403756

Auteurs

Julie Highfield (J)

Cardiff Critical Care, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.

Jack Parry-Jones (J)

Cardiff Critical Care, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.

Classifications MeSH