Treatment expectations as a possible prognostic factor for DMARD response in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort study.

DMARDs behavior biomarkers patient attitude to health quality of life rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease
ISSN: 1759-720X
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517322

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 31 10 2020
accepted: 19 04 2021
entrez: 7 6 2021
pubmed: 8 6 2021
medline: 8 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The prediction of the individual's response to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is challenging and often limited. Here we evaluated the influence of patients' expectations towards a change in treatment with DMARD on clinical outcome in RA. One hundred patients (74 female) with RA (2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria) and an upcoming change in DMARD treatment due to non-response or adverse effects were included. Patients' treatment beliefs, health-related quality of life and treatment expectations were measured using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), the Short Form 36, and self-designed questions about expectations before treatment initiation (T0), and DAS28-CRP was calculated at T0 and after 4 months (T4). Associations between patients' beliefs and expectations and changes in DAS28-CRP (T0 to T4, ΔDAS28-CRP) were explored by regression analyses after multiple imputation. A total of 99 patients were included, of whom 84 completed all questionnaires. Thirty-six percent of all variability in treatment response (ΔDAS28-CRP) was explained by expectations assessed with the questionnaires and the C-reactive protein (CRP)-value at T0. Among these, the expected improvement rate, with 10.5%, as well as the CRP-value at T0, with 10.6%, had the greatest positive effect whereas the fear of adverse effects, with 11.4%, and the BMQ.concern scale, with 9.0%, had the greatest negative impact on ΔDAS28. Patients' expectations towards newly induced DMARD therapies influence clinical response and may serve as possible explanatory factors for treatment response affecting subjective and objective outcome parameters. DRKS00017005.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The prediction of the individual's response to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is challenging and often limited. Here we evaluated the influence of patients' expectations towards a change in treatment with DMARD on clinical outcome in RA.
METHODS METHODS
One hundred patients (74 female) with RA (2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria) and an upcoming change in DMARD treatment due to non-response or adverse effects were included. Patients' treatment beliefs, health-related quality of life and treatment expectations were measured using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), the Short Form 36, and self-designed questions about expectations before treatment initiation (T0), and DAS28-CRP was calculated at T0 and after 4 months (T4). Associations between patients' beliefs and expectations and changes in DAS28-CRP (T0 to T4, ΔDAS28-CRP) were explored by regression analyses after multiple imputation.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 99 patients were included, of whom 84 completed all questionnaires. Thirty-six percent of all variability in treatment response (ΔDAS28-CRP) was explained by expectations assessed with the questionnaires and the C-reactive protein (CRP)-value at T0. Among these, the expected improvement rate, with 10.5%, as well as the CRP-value at T0, with 10.6%, had the greatest positive effect whereas the fear of adverse effects, with 11.4%, and the BMQ.concern scale, with 9.0%, had the greatest negative impact on ΔDAS28.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Patients' expectations towards newly induced DMARD therapies influence clinical response and may serve as possible explanatory factors for treatment response affecting subjective and objective outcome parameters.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER BACKGROUND
DRKS00017005.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34093746
doi: 10.1177/1759720X211015829
pii: 10.1177_1759720X211015829
pmc: PMC8142018
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1759720X211015829

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Références

Clin Rheumatol. 1999;18(5):369-72
pubmed: 10524550
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Sep;66(9):1227-32
pubmed: 17405834
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Feb;48(4):597-602
pubmed: 30075990
Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Jan;43(1):22-9
pubmed: 10643696
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar;73(3):492-509
pubmed: 24161836
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Nov;60(11):3217-24
pubmed: 19877042
J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Apr;24(4):445-8
pubmed: 19825901
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Jan;53(1):76-84
pubmed: 24056521
Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(2):257-69
pubmed: 25163734
BMC Med. 2017 Jan 10;15(1):4
pubmed: 28069021
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Dec;66(12):1799-807
pubmed: 24839031
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jun;66(6):861-8
pubmed: 24339425
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Sep;32(9):2759-67
pubmed: 21822659
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):16-22
pubmed: 25990290
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):409-13
pubmed: 21087373
J Rheumatol. 2016 Mar;43(3):512-23
pubmed: 26879354
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 02;8(12):e80633
pubmed: 24312488
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:233
pubmed: 28270786
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Jun;50(3):377-80
pubmed: 8935473
Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247-63
pubmed: 8450681
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 16;8(8):
pubmed: 31426398
Pharmacogenomics. 2017 Sep;18(14):1323-1332
pubmed: 28836487
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 28;7:1876
pubmed: 27965612
Epilepsy Res. 1996 Oct;25(2):113-8
pubmed: 8884169
J Rheumatol. 2007 Aug;34(8):1670-3
pubmed: 17611987
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Jul;36(7):1511-1519
pubmed: 28451872
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1359-66
pubmed: 8560303
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Dec;45(12):1558-65
pubmed: 16705046
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-977
pubmed: 28264816
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007 Dec;3(12):681
pubmed: 18037928
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 19;16(1):238
pubmed: 30567550
Clin Med (Lond). 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):536-9
pubmed: 17228551
Psychol Bull. 2004 Mar;130(2):324-40
pubmed: 14979775
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Feb;45(4):386-90
pubmed: 26254548
Clin Trials. 2012 Dec;9(6):767-76
pubmed: 23169874
Scand J Rheumatol. 2018 May;47(3):178-184
pubmed: 28967272
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Nov;52(11):3381-90
pubmed: 16258899
Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jan;38(1):44-8
pubmed: 7818570
Intern Med. 2017;56(8):903-906
pubmed: 28420837

Auteurs

Johanna Mucke (J)

Policlinic and Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.

Ralph Brinks (R)

Policlinic and Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Germany.

Argyri Dimitriou (A)

Policlinic and Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Germany.

Jutta G Richter (JG)

Policlinic and Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Germany.

Matthias Schneider (M)

Policlinic and Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Germany.

Classifications MeSH