A review of cleaning and disinfection guidelines and recommendations following an outbreak of classical scrapie.


Journal

Preventive veterinary medicine
ISSN: 1873-1716
Titre abrégé: Prev Vet Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8217463

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 09 02 2021
revised: 27 04 2021
accepted: 21 05 2021
pubmed: 8 6 2021
medline: 5 11 2021
entrez: 7 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Classical scrapie is a prion disease of small ruminants, the infectious agent of which has been shown to be extremely persistent in the environment. Cleaning and disinfection (C&D) after a scrapie outbreak is currently recommended by many governments' veterinary advisors and implemented in most farms affected. Yet, the effectiveness of these procedures remains unclear. The aim of this study was to review existing literature and guidelines regarding farm C&D protocols following classical scrapie outbreaks and assess their effectiveness and the challenges that translation of policy and legislative requirements present at a practical level. A review of the literature was conducted to identify the on-farm C&D protocols used following outbreaks of scrapie, assess those materials with high risk for persistence of the scrapie agent on farms, and review the existing evidence of the effectiveness of recommended C&D protocols. An expert workshop was also organised in Great Britain (GB) to assess: the decision-making process used when implementing C&D protocols on GB farms, the experts' perceptions on the effectiveness of these protocols and changes needed, and their views on potential recommendations for policy and research. Outputs of the literature review revealed that the current recommended protocol for C&D [1 h treatment with sodium hypochlorite containing 20,000 ppm free chlorine or 2 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH)] is based on laboratory experiments. Only four field farm experiments have been conducted, indicating a lack of data on effectiveness of C&D protocols on farms by the re-occurrence of scrapie infection post re-stocking. Recommendations related to the control of outdoor environment, which are difficult and expensive to implement, vary between countries. The expert workshop concluded that there are no practical, cost-effective C&D alternatives to be considered at this time, with control therefore based on C&D only in combination with additional time restrictions on re-stocking and replacement with non-susceptible livestock or more genetically resistant types, where available. Participants agreed that C&D should still be completed on scrapie affected farms, as it is considered to be "good disease practice" and likely to reduce the levels of the prion protein. Participants felt that any additional protocols developed should not be "too prescriptive" (should not be written down in specific policies) because of significant variation in farm types, farm equipment and installations. Under this scenario, control of classical scrapie on farms should be designed with a level of C&D in combination with re-stocking temporal ban and replacement with livestock of limited susceptibility.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34098231
pii: S0167-5877(21)00132-X
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105388
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prions 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105388

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Pablo Alarcon (P)

Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK; Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK. Electronic address: palarcon@rvc.ac.uk.

Francisco Marco-Jimenez (F)

Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK; Department of Animal Sciences, Universitat Politècnica de València, C/Camino de vera s/n, Valencia, 46071, Spain.

Verity Horigan (V)

Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK.

Angel Ortiz-Pelaez (A)

European Food Safety Authority, Parma, Italy.

Brenda Rajanayagam (B)

Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK.

Aidan Dryden (A)

APHA, Worcester CSC, County Hall, Spetchley Road, Worcester, WR5 2NP, UK.

Hugh Simmons (H)

Department of Pathology and Animal Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK.

Timm Konold (T)

Department of Pathology and Animal Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK. Electronic address: Timm.Konold@apha.gov.uk.

Carmen Marco (C)

APHA Advice Services, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK.

Judith Charnley (J)

APHA Foundry House, Carleton Rd, Skipton North Yorks, BD23 2BE, UK.

John Spiropoulos (J)

Department of Pathology and Animal Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK.

Claire Cassar (C)

Laboratory Services, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK.

Amie Adkin (A)

Food Standards Agency, Clive House, 70 Petty France, London, SW1H 9EX, UK.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH